490 likes | 779 Views
Safety Sensors. (IR and ultrasonic compression). Concerns about sensors. Price Range Coverage time Temperature sensitivity. Design Vs. Buy OTS. Design our own Advantage low cost Design to spec Disadvantage Time Not appealing Buy OTS sensors Advantages less time
E N D
Safety Sensors (IR and ultrasonic compression)
Concerns about sensors • Price • Range • Coverage • time • Temperature sensitivity
Design Vs. Buy OTS • Design our own • Advantage • low cost • Design to spec • Disadvantage • Time • Not appealing • Buy OTS sensors • Advantages • less time • Easy to manufacture • appealing • Disadvantages • costly
Additional Accessories -addition to safety -addition to wow factor
Status lights + Auto lighting • Status lights • Auto lighting
Status lights • Individual color LEDs indicate the operational status of the robot • Example of an LED driver (analog.com)
Auto-Lighting • By using ambient light transducers, or photoresistor, lighting around the robot can be turned on/off autonomously Ambient light detector (microsemi.com) Picture of a photo-resistor and circuit Light detector with built-in signal processing circuit for light modulation system
The Intelligent Algorithm Speaker: James Harris
Overview • Introduction • Initial Thoughts • Pathfinding Process • Types • Optimization • Conclusion
Initial Thoughts • Ant Foraging • Bacterial Foraging • Particle Swarm Optimization • Pathfinding Algorithm • Binary Tree
Types • Dijkstra’s Algorithm • Best First-Search • A* Algorithm
PROS Finds a shortest path Guaranteed to work CONS Simplest case Inefficient in amount of work Dijkstra’s Algorithm
PROS Efficient amount of work Fast CONS Greedy: uses a heuristic to guide itself Best First Search
A* Algorithm • Most popular • Favors vertices that are close to the starting point (DA) and the goal (BFS) • Faster and more efficient
Optimization Techniques • Different score function • Genetic Algorithms • Neural Networks • Learning
Summary • Introduction • Pathfinding Background • Pathfinding Process • Types • Optimization • Conclusion
The Competition Speaker: James Harris
Overview • Introduction • Segway RMP 400 • Raymond Model 102XM • Seekur • PowerBot • Conclusion
Segway RMP 400: Specifications • Speed: 6.67 m/s • Weight: 109kg • Dimensions: 76x112x61 cm • Payload: 181kg
Pros All-terrain Looks cool Autonomous Can attach multiple RPs together Stable Operation Can add sensing devices Cons No bumpers Cannot hold objects Segway RMP 400
Raymond Model 102XM: Specifications • Payload: 2042kg • Incline: 60% grade • Speed: 1.7m/s • Weight: 272kg
Pros Pavement Powerful Hand Controls Stable Programmable Cons User-dependent Huge Large turn radius Expensive Little wow factor Raymond Model 102XM:
Review • Segway RMP 400 • Raymond Model 102XM • Seekur • PowerBot