1 / 12

Preventing Network Abuse in the Asia Pacific Region: APNIC's Role and Initiatives

Learn about APNIC's role in preventing network abuse and how it raises awareness for responsible network management in the Asia Pacific. Discover the importance of reporting network abuse and the distribution of complaints. Get involved in maintaining correct contact information in WHOIS and providing feedback on abuse handling.

chambright
Download Presentation

Preventing Network Abuse in the Asia Pacific Region: APNIC's Role and Initiatives

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A week in the life of security@apnic.net (IRT email address) Frank Salanitri Project & Systems Services Manager, APNIC ＊和訳：JPNIC　奥谷泉

  2. What is APNIC role in preventing network abuse? 2 As a registry, APNIC adopts and applies policies for it’s communitywhich address network abuse. APNIC does not have the capacity to investigate abuse complaints or the legal powers to regulate Internet activity. APNIC seeks to raise awareness of the need for responsible network management in the Asia Pacific, through training and communication.

  3. IRT Object 3 • Reporting of network abuse can be directed to specialized teams such as Incident Response Teams (IRTs) • Implemented in AP region by policy Prop-079 in November 2010. • Mandatory for inetnum, inet6num and aut-num objects created and updated in whois database. • JAPAN has approximately 7200 inetnum objects. 4000 with missing IRT maintainer.

  4. No. of complaints to security@apnic.net 14th – 20th March 2011 4

  5. Distribution of Complaints for the week 5

  6. Distribution of email type complains by economy 6

  7. Distribution of Non-email type complains by economy 7

  8. 70 Complaints Week 3 March - JAPAN

  9. 376 Complaints March - Japan

  10. In Conclusion • The top abuse type complaints received for JP are Spams(75%) and Attacks(20%) • IRT objects are registered in APNIC Whois to reach the appropriate people for abuse complaints • We understand there are issues with POCs in handling these complaints: • POCs are always not uptodate/reachable • POCs receive a large amout of spams • We require a mechanism in place to help resolve these complaints • Up to date information about abuse contacts in WHOIS is essential • APNIC would like to discuss any issues for registering or disclosing abuse contacts with the community

  11. What can you do? • We need your co-operation to maintain correct contacts in WHOIS • Please review your contacts in Whois - email/phone. • Report incorrect contacts in APNIC WHOIS to helpdesk@apnic.net • Give us your feedback about effectiveness of IRT objects, or if any problems/suggested solutions in abuse handling • APNIC secretariat : “helpdesk@apnic.net” • You can make policy proposals to improve IRT and POCs in Whois if you feel there is a need for change.

  12. Abuse BoF@APNIC33 Thank you • Join us in APNIC33@New Delhi, India • 28 Feb 2012 • http://meetings.apnic.net/33/program/bof

More Related