350 likes | 494 Views
Task Group 6 “Software Product Quality Measurement. Meeting 59 September 16, 2008. WG 6 Terms of Reference. Development of standards and technical reports for software products evaluation and metrics for software products & processes. A View of Using the SQuaRE Series. Customer User
E N D
Task Group 6“Software Product Quality Measurement Meeting 59 September 16, 2008
WG 6 Terms of Reference • Development of standards and technical reports for software products evaluation and metrics for software products & processes.
A View of Using the SQuaRE Series Customer User Development Organization Acquirer Evaluator Developer guidance guidance perform provide Product Quality Requirements Product Quality Evaluation determines Product Quality Model and Measurement supports supports
Task Group 6 Mission (draft) • To highlight the importance of addressing product quality characteristics and measurement and analysis throughout the product development life-cycle, during system acquisition, and during its use and operation • To ensure sound measurement practices are incorporated into SC7 standards • To represent relevant US communities of interest with respect to the above
WG6 Business Plan • To be discussed at the Niigata interim meeting • See next chart on the SQuaRE architecture
ISO/IEC 2504n: Quality Evaluation Division ISO/IEC 2501n: Quality Model Division ISO/IEC 2503n: Quality Requirement Division 25010: Quality Model (CD) 25030: Quality Requirements (FDIS) 25040: Quality Evaluation Overview (CD) 25012: Data Quality Model (3rd CD) 25041: Evaluation Module (NYA) ISO/IEC 2500n: Product Quality General Division 25000: Guide to SQuaRE (IS) 25042: Developers’ Process (NYA) 25001: Planning and Management (IS) 25043: Acquirer’ Process (NYA) ISO/IEC 2502n: Quality Measurement Division 25044: Evaluators’ Process (NYA) 25020: Measurement Reference Model (FDIS) 25021: Quality Measure Elements (DTR) 25022: Measurement of Internal Quality (WD) 25023: Measurement of External Quality (WD) 25024: Measurement of Quality in Use (WD) SQuaRE Architecture and Stage 25051: Requirements for Quality of COTS (IS) ISO/IEC 25050 ~ 25099: SQuaRE Extension Division 25061: Common Industrial Format for Usability Test Rep (IS)
Actions-Agenda • Review and determine US positions and comments • CD 25045 Evaluation Module for Recoverability • CD 25010.2 Quality Model • FDIS 25012 Data Quality Model • DIS 20926 IFPUG Functional Size Measurement Method • Systematic Reviews 9126-2 and 9126-3 • Begin/Review NWIP/WD for • None at this time. However, the remaining measurement division documents in SQuaRE are likely to begin once the Quality Model stabilizes • Approve delegates to WG06 Interim Meeting • Niigata, Japan Oct. 19-25, 2008 • Other discussion topics and administrative actions on the agenda • Review draft of TG6 Mission
ISO/IEC DIS 20926 IFPUG Function Size Measurement Method: 2009 Recommended Position: Approve with No Comments This recommendation comes from TG12 rep.
Systematic Review of 9126-2/3 These are the Internal and External Quality Measurement Technical Reports that are companions to 9126-1, the product quality model. They will be revised as part of the SQuaRE series. There is nothing else to serve in their place at this time. Recommendation: Approve with no modification.
FDIS 25012 This is the Data Quality Model standard. TG6 has been involved with the development of this standard throughout. During this meeting we will take one last look, but expect to vote to approve.
25045 Evaluation Module for Recoverability TG6 has not been involved with this standard. It is based on work done by IBM Toronto. We would welcome input from others on this topic.
25010 – Quality Model This is where I plan to spend most of our time. This is the revision of the quality model that is currently published as 9126-1. It is out for its 2nd CD ballot. Much work was done on this in Berlin.
Delegates to Niigata • David Zubrow – US HoD to WG6 • Mike Kress • Mary Theofanos • Priority issue for Niigata • 25010 - Quality model – proposing to eliminate internal, external, and quality in use models and to have only one set of quality characteristics
Project Status Standard number Standard title • This is a running history detailing the SC7 N-documents connected with this project, what action is needed now, and eventual goal for this activity • .Indicate when the standard should reach final approval • Use pages as needed for active projects. • List approved standards with no current work in the backup • Add pages if needed to summarize technical issues for general discussion, coordination needed with other TG during the meeting, and administrative actions
WG 6 Functional View – Existing Standards • This is a graphic or tabular view of the current WG portfolio
Future WG6 Standards Portfolio • This is a graphic or tabular view of the intended WG portfolio
Existing Product Status • This is a list of active standards with no current work: when they were last approved and when they will need to be reaffirmed or updated, or if they are source documents for newer standards
ISO/IEC JTC1/SC7/WG6 Project Status Report May 19, 2008 Motoei AZUMA SC7/WG6 Convener Toshihiro KOMIYAMA SC7/WG6 Secretariat
Task Group 6“Software Product Quality Measurement” TG Lead: Dave Zubrow Meeting 58 Outbrief NIST - Gaithersburg MD (M. Kress for Dave Zubrow) March 24-26, 2008
TG 6 Participants • Dave Zubrow (HoD) • Brian Stanton • Mike Kress • Mary Theofanos
25012 Position and Comments • Recommendation – Disapprove with changes, if changes are made then approve • 16 Comments • 5 TH • 6 TL • 5 E • Key comments: • Document attempts to categorize characteristics into artificial categories (Intrinsic/Extended) in a confusing way that does not add value.
25040 Position and Comments • Recommendation – Approve with changes • 10 Comments • 2 TH • 2 TL • 1 GT • 5 E • Key comments • This draft is much improved and they made significant changes to our comments in the last ballot • Primary concern is that the scope creeps into 25030
25045 Position and Comments • Recommendation – Approve with comments • 2 Comments • 1 TH • 1 GE • Key comments: TR contains a conformance clause
25060 Position and Comments • Recommendation – Approve • 11 Comments • 1 TL • 10 E • Key comments US delegates were the primary authors
19761 Position and Comments • Recommendation – Request ballot be withdrawn, • Key comments: NWIP is not the correct mechanism for a revision of an IS Recommend to SC7 to follow JTC1 Directives for changes.