‘Unity of Knowledge’ using Greimas semiotic square

1. ‘Unity of Knowledge’ using Greimas semiotic square Autopoeisis and structural coupling Observing (naming) Interpretive complimentarity Theorising (relating in cultural awareness) Expressing (understanding) Contrary- actually difficult to move across) Contradictory- where movement ‘flows’ first complimentary For Greimas the ‘socially explosive’ position was the bottom left corner – which was moving from what encompassed both of the first positions . So here by ‘starting’ with the living , first movement is through the contradiction of expressing feeling of living, over time a ‘complimentary relation to this settles – that of ‘naming’ which is a form of observing ( not actually living , but in contrary position to on-going living. So this far in the chiasma there are intertwinings inscribed throughagreimas form – but the ‘explosive’ position is explicating an ‘explanation’ – to move from describing to a scientific account ‘theorising’ , which over time influences a form of living in its ‘complimentarity’ – and this has always been there.