160 likes | 297 Views
TGYS Data Interpretation and Reporting Results. Peter Chen, PhD Julie Gibbs, BSW Julie Maertens, MS Julie Sampson, MS Stefanie Putter, BA. Objectives. Roadmap. Program evaluation review Discussion of your data: Desired evaluation results Factors affecting your results
E N D
TGYS Data Interpretation and Reporting Results Peter Chen, PhD Julie Gibbs, BSW Julie Maertens, MS Julie Sampson, MS Stefanie Putter, BA
Roadmap • Program evaluation review • Discussion of your data: • Desired evaluation results • Factors affecting your results • Comparison data • Next steps
Program Evaluation Cycle • Create logic model • Decide on a design • Pick measurement tool • Data analysis • Data reporting & reflection
Evaluation Terms • Sample/Sample Size • Scale/Measure • Subscale • Mean • Comparison/Aggregate Data • Norms
Statistical Terms • T-test • P-value • p<.05 • Effect Size
Example • =
Data Management • Fill in bubbles completely with pencil • Fill in the entire administrative • section • Don’t use photocopies
Comparison Data • How does your agency compare to other TGYS grantees? • Are you surprised by these differences? • Would you expect these differences?
Next Steps • Discuss results with key staff • Learn from other grantees • Contact your TGYS technical evaluator
CSU team contact information: • Julie Maertens: jmtgys@lamar.colostate.eduJulie Sampson: jstgys@lamar.colostate.eduStefanie Putter: sptgys@lamar.colostate.edu • You can also check • out our website!