380 likes | 508 Views
The Story of Human Evolution. From Primates to Homo sapiens sapiens. The Myth of the Biggest and Bestest. “survival of the fittest” Our cultural problem Stephen Jay Gould
E N D
The Story of Human Evolution From Primates to Homo sapiens sapiens
The Myth of the Biggest and Bestest • “survival of the fittest” • Our cultural problem • Stephen Jay Gould • history of biological life = “proliferation of enormously varied designs subsequently restricted to a few highly successful, but imperfect, forms” • “Our world is not an optimal place fine-tuned by omnipotent forces of selection. It is a quirky mass of imperfections, working well enough (often admirably); a jury-rigged set of adaptations, built of curious parts made available by past histories in different contexts.”
Considering Evolution • Natural Selection: • an evolutionary process through which factors in the environment exert pressure that favors some individuals over others to reproduce the nextgeneration of the group • this pressure acts on phenotype (genes plus environment), not genotype (DNA, genetic makeup)
Never exact match between phenotype • and genotype • Never exact fit between organism and • environment: dynamism • Biological plasticity of individuals
Note: there are prosimians (eg lemurs), new world monkeys (eg spider monkey, Old world monkeys (eg baboons), and apes. Apes include gibbons, orangutans, chimps, bonobos, gorillas and humans. 99% of human DNA shared with chimps (study in Nature, 8.31.2005) Fig 8-2
Primate Tendencies • Grasping and opposable thumbs • Smell sight • mouth hand • brain complexity increases • parental investment increases • Sociality increases Snarling mandrill
Gorilla family gibbon humans chimp
Primate Social Behavior • Wide range of social behaviors and types of social organization for different species—a few examples follow • Male led (chimps), female led (bonobos), • Savanna baboons—highly complex multi male and female troops • Only ape that is monogamous—gibbon • Apes that display wide range of sexual behavior—bonobos
Overview of Hominid Evolution • Australopithecines (Lucy) 5-2 million years ago (mya) • Gracile • Robust • Homo habilis (3-2 mya) • Homo erectus (1.5 – 0.4 mya, or ?12,000ya) • Homo sapiens (.02 mya, 200k-present) • Homo sapiens neanderthalensis 60k • Homo sapiens sapiens (dif places different times) 200,000k
Key Ideas • Feedback and inadvertency • Bipedalism • Brain Size/complexity • Tools, Language and Culture • Shifts in lifestyles/diets • Types of evolutionary change • Graduated • Punctuated Equilibrium
Chimp Skeleton Human skeleton Fig 9-5
Characteristics of Australopithecines • General Characteristics • Skeleton: Bipedal, not fully upright • Brain only slightly bigger than a chimp’s. • Smaller canines than a chimp, bigger molars • Hands: precision and power grip. • Likely savanna adaptation—likely vegetarian • Robustus has extreme savanna adaptation • Recent debate re: degree of bipedality, habitat type
The skeleton of Lucy, notice the bipedality along with a relatively small cranium and chimp-like skull
Australopithecus sites in Africa Fig 9-8
On Bipedalism: Australopithecines take steps… • Disadvantages? • visible to predators • exposed underbelly • slow • Advantages? • Man the hunter? (NO!) • Woman the food carrier • Infant carry Artist’s rendering of A. africanus (interesting way in which racial ideas intervene)
Why Be Bipedal? • Advantages, con’d • Efficient food procurement? • See farther? • Efficient long distance travel? • Cool brain? • All of the above? Artist’s rendering of A. africanus
Effect of Bipedality: inadvertency in human evolution, 2 examples • 1. Hands are free • tool use • increasing tool use leads to increasing brain size and complexity • 2. the birth canal problem and its consequence • (evolution at work)
From Australopithecus to Homo: moving towards culture • Homo habilis (the handy man!)—(3-2 mya) • Brain • larger: 650 cm2 • area of skull indicates language • Body • more gracile
Robust and Habilis Hung Out • Robust australopithecines (A. boisei) and H. habilis co-existed for at least 1/2 million years • What happened? Why did Australopithecines die out? • Competitive exclusion? • Niche divergence? (natural selection is environment specific)
Homo Erectus • Lived 1.5 to .4 mya • 1 mya as single spp. • Example of punctuated equilibrium • Significant increase in brain size: 850-1200 • Fully erect/bipedal
Homo Erectus Lifestyle, con’d • First use of fire • cook • heat • protection against predators • thaw out carcasses • Evidence of “culture” or symbolic activity • complexity of tools • cooperative hunting • red ochre
Homo Erectus lifestyle, con’d • Migration out of Africa, first time in H. history
Modern Humans, Early Homo sapiens sapiens • Timing of first evidence • Africa: more than 100,000 ya • Asia: 60,000 ya • Europe: 35,000 ya • Australia: 40,000 ya • Americas: 20,000 ya
Early Modern H. s. s. • Cultural changes • Art (Cro Magnon) • tools • standardization • distinct sets for distinct areas indicating cultural diversity
Neanderthals • Debate over where they belong in evolutionary story • The “cave man” …with a large brain • Robust skeletons • Latest research
Recent Finding from Indonesia • 2004: Tiny Homo floresiensis, 3 feet tall, resembling H. erectus in some ways, but found with evidence of highly developed culture, boats, etc • Endemic island dwarfing (happens to a lot of other large mammals on islands) • Small brain, lots of smartness… • Co-habited earth with modern humans—these finds are from 12-18 k years ago • Cultural groups in the area have stories/legends about “small people” • Most recent debates: some researchers argue that these are just small modern humans
Theories of the Origins of Modern Humans • Two competing theories: • Multiregional • Replacement/Out of Africa • Multiregional/Local Continuity Theory • evidence • apparently intermediate fossil forms between H. erectus and modern humans in each location (Africa, Asia, Europe)
Theories of the Origins of Modern Humans, con’d • Replacement/Out of Africa-Mitochondrial Eve Theory • evidence • earliest H. sapiens sapiens found in Africa • Mitochondrial and nuclear DNA • all humans closely related, genes diverged from single recent African origin, at about 100 kya • Neanderthal mtDNA is not more similar to European than any other
The Most Logical Theory: A Mix of the two • Independent evolution unlikely 3x • Interbreeding/gene flow likely, migration and movement all along • The human thing • migration • interbreeding • Implications for understanding race
Questions to ask about your skulls • What species is it? • When did it live? • What are its key skeletal and other (?culture, etc) features • Why is it significant? • Where does it fit on evolutionary tree leading to Homo sapiens sapiens