1 / 43

Peeking at the Data… and Looking Beyond.

Horace W. Porter September 4,2012. Peeking at the Data… and Looking Beyond. Mathematics . Grades 3-8. Three Year Performance Level Comparison: Mathematics. Cohort Comparison ‘11-’12 Grade 4: Mathematics. Cohort Comparison ‘11-’12 Grade 5: Mathematics.

charla
Download Presentation

Peeking at the Data… and Looking Beyond.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Horace W. Porter September 4,2012 Peeking at the Data…and Looking Beyond.

  2. Mathematics Grades 3-8

  3. Three Year Performance Level Comparison: Mathematics

  4. Cohort Comparison ‘11-’12 Grade 4: Mathematics

  5. Cohort Comparison ‘11-’12 Grade 5: Mathematics

  6. Cohort Comparison ‘11-’12 Grade 6: Mathematics

  7. Cohort Comparison ‘11-’12 Grade 7: Mathematics

  8. Cohort Comparison ‘11-’12 Grade 8: Mathematics

  9. State Comparison: Mathematics

  10. DRG Comparison: Mathematics

  11. Reading Grades 3-8

  12. Three Year Performance Level Comparison: Reading

  13. Cohort Comparison ‘11-’12 Grade 4: Reading

  14. Cohort Comparison ‘11-’12 Grade 5: Reading

  15. Cohort Comparison ‘11-’12 Grade 6: Reading

  16. Cohort Comparison ‘11-’12 Grade 7: Reading

  17. Cohort Comparison ‘11-’12 Grade 8: Reading

  18. State Comparison: Reading

  19. DRG Comparison: Reading

  20. Writing Grades 3-8

  21. Three Year Performance Level Comparison: Writing

  22. Cohort Comparison ‘11-’12 Grade 4: Writing

  23. Cohort Comparison ‘11-’12 Grade 5: Writing

  24. Cohort Comparison ‘11-’12 Grade 6: Writing

  25. Cohort Comparison ‘11-’12 Grade 7: Writing

  26. Cohort Comparison ‘11-’12 Grade 8: Writing

  27. State Comparison: Writing

  28. DRG Comparison: Writing

  29. Science Elementary and Middle School *Grade 5 CMT includes curriculum from Grades 3-5 and Grade 8 CMT includes curriculum from Grades 6-8

  30. Three Year Performance Level Comparison: Science *Grade 5 CMT includes curriculum from Grades 3-5 **Grade 8 CMT includes curriculum from Grades 6-8

  31. DRG Comparison: Science *Grade 5 CMT includes curriculum from Grades 3-5 **Grade 8 CMT includes curriculum from Grades 6-8

  32. Accountability CMT’s and the Teacher Evaluation System

  33. Why Connecticut has changed the system of accountability: • CT received a waiver from AYP • CT’s waiver included: • Goal – not Proficiency – as expected performance level • Growth Model: • Counting all student movement between all levels shows growth • Student performance goals are meaningful for schools

  34. Major shifts:

  35. Performance Index • Index between 0 and 100 • Counts performance in all tested grade levels • Captures performance across performance bands • Includes all tested subjects: reading, writing, math, and science • Incorporates all tested students, including students who take the MAS and the Skills Checklist • Provides subject-specific indices and overall index • Calculated for “all students” group and subgroups: ELL, SWD, Black, Hispanic, F/R lunch

  36. School Performance Indicator (SPI)

  37. Connecticut State Targets: following 2018 Horace W. Porter School’s Baseline SPI (2012) = 87.2% Columbia School System’s Baseline DPI (2012) = 87.0%

  38. School Classification: Met all state targets • Excelling • Progressing • Transition • Review (inc. Focus) • Turnaround Meeting annual targets Not meeting annual targets Need the most support: eligible for Commissioner’s Network; otherwise, district-led interventions and redesign

  39. Schools of Distinction

  40. How did we do? • Our Results

  41. Goal Setting • All teachers need to write several goals • One Goal is aligned to improving the SPI, which counts for 5% of the teacher’s total evaluation • To help work towards improving the SPI, all teachers will set a goal around reading

  42. Teacher Support and Development • All teachers have received a book entitled, “Developing Content Vocabulary” • All teachers have been trained in “reading across the content areas” • Language Arts Teachers K-8 have been trained in Reading Workshop for consistency across grade levels • Additional professional development and support during monthly Faculty/Curriculum Meetings and weekly Team Meetings

  43. Thank You! Alyssa Gwinnell September 4, 2012 Acting Principal agwinnell@hwporter.org Horace W. Porter School 860.228.9493

More Related