70 likes | 204 Views
DAGS ATT DRA NER TERMOSTATEN. Economic battle: Economic pro and contra of green construction PRO Estate St. Petersburg 09.09.2010. Med varma hälsningar, jorden. Nordic countries vs Russia. Energy efficiency is required by the state and consumers, in Russia not
E N D
DAGS ATT DRA NER TERMOSTATEN Economic battle: Economic pro and contra of green construction PRO Estate St. Petersburg09.09.2010 Med varma hälsningar, jorden
Nordic countries vs Russia • Energy efficiency is required by the state and consumers, in Russia not • In Russia possibility to save only on consumption • Energy pricing still subsidized • In Nordic energy efficiency gives added value to developer and consumer • privileges and respect from the State (taxes, support) • less monthly payments for using of energy resources • Higher value on sale actions in the future
Energy efficient solution examples(applied in Nordic countries) • Geothermal energy • Geothermal energy is a type of renewable energy • Heating and hot water, possibility for cooling • Needs additional electricity capacity • Save homeowners 70-90 percent in heating costs, compared to conventional systems Heat recovery ventilation system • Possibility for apartment isolated ventilation system (without common ducts) • People can adjust ventilation completely themselves, not affecting to neighbours • Better inside air quality • Big savings of heating energy 30-80% due to heating of income air by energy outgoing air and low consumption electrical equipment • Regular ventilation whole year Solar panels and wind mills are also used quite often, but it is not applicable enough for St. Petersburg area • Sewage recovering system • Valuable source of energy • Possibility to install in high storey buildings • Savings of heating energy (30%)
Obstacles for usage of energy efficient solutions in St. Petersburg • Not enough laws or operation prohibitive laws concerning that issue: building norms, regulations, rules, etc. • Calculation of capacities and design have to be made according operating norms. Procedure of approval of deviations from norms is too long and complicated. • Double systems etc. • Payments for limits (heating, electricity, water and sewage) and for outside networks’ construction (electricity) are made straight to monopolists of energy resources. • Lack of any privileges from State for efficient energy consumption. • No experience of energy efficient or/and ecology building specification (like BREEAM or LEED) • Not enough attention from end customer to energy efficiency topic, mainly because of still quite affordable price for energy resources
NCC strategy for green solutions • Advantages for NCC company • Target to have less payments for capacity limits • Less construction costs for outside networks • Conformity with European standards • Less damages to environment • Lighting in common corridors are controlled in movement censors • Triple layers windows • Air tightness • Energy efficient lifts • Heat recovery • Taps, wc-toilets - eco-models • Tighten U-values, walls - 0,15 W/m²K windows -1,0 W/m²K (heating energy savings yearly about 20%) • Kitchen equipment A-class or better • Energy saving lamps 11W-15W or led lamps • Water meters (hot and cold) • Advantages for future inhabitants • Much less monthly payments for energy resources • They are more independent from tariffs politic and more stable to emergency situations • More combatable human environment NCC target is to exceed existing norms on 20/25%