1 / 18

Overview and Mechanical/Thermal IFs to FPU

Overview and Mechanical/Thermal IFs to FPU. PACS IHDR. MPE J. Schubert. Content. Overview QM FPU, Status and Problem Areas Status PACS Mechanical I/F to S/C Status PACS Thermal I/F to S/C Allowed Mechanical Loads to Ge:Ga Detector I/Fs Design and Changes on Cooler L0 I/Fs

chas
Download Presentation

Overview and Mechanical/Thermal IFs to FPU

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Overview and Mechanical/Thermal IFs to FPU PACS IHDR MPE J. Schubert Overview and Mechanical/Thermal IFs to FPU

  2. Content • Overview QM FPU, Status and Problem Areas • Status PACS Mechanical I/F to S/C • Status PACS Thermal I/F to S/C • Allowed Mechanical Loads to Ge:Ga Detector I/Fs • Design and Changes on Cooler L0 I/Fs • Allowed Mechanical Loads to Level 0 Cooler I/Fs • Temperatures of LO I/F to HERSCHEL S/C • In Orbit • On Ground (IMT, and EQM) Overview and Mechanical/Thermal IFs to FPU

  3. Overview PACS FPU • FPU QM structural parts manufacturing and assembly completed • Housing compartments blackened with KT 70 • Top Optic mirrors integration and alignment started • Thermal and Load/Structural Analysis finalized • Mechanical, Thermal and Electrical I/Fs to the S/C and to Subunits frozen • Warm and Cryo Vibration performed on STM structure with success • Subunits delivered (Chopper) or within the end of the AIV phase • Extremely tight schedule increases risk for all parties and possibly shifts problem to the FM Overview and Mechanical/Thermal IFs to FPU

  4. Overview (cont.) • Open issues to be worked on • Distribution board  qualification/testing of PCB board not finalised, delaminating problem observed, investigation ongoing • Mirrors Gold layer on 3 of 13 mirror batches did not pass the tape test, investigation ongoing • Detector Array Delta cold vibration tests to be performed on Detector Array Components • PhFPU Bolometer Kevlar suspension failed during cold vibration in STM FPU, cold delta vibration test in preparation • PhFPU I/F to S/C  a) mechanical load from S/C cooling is critical, b) not enough clearance between back shells of S/C harness and PhFPU connector panel (TBC) Overview and Mechanical/Thermal IFs to FPU

  5. PACS Mechanical I/F to S/C • PACS FPU ICD Drawing Issue 27 DRAFT distributed to ESA & Industry for comment, 04-July-03 • Major design changes compared to issue 25 reworked+implemented • Level 0 S/C IF to Ge:Ga detectors, pin to flat I/F (compliant to IID-A) • Mechanical I/F to OB, pin diameter & position (compliant to IID-A) • Further detailed information added • Cold/Warm configuration, Mounting & Handling Equipment and Non Flight Items etc., drawing split into ten separate drawings • Final release after working in ASTRIUM comments (received 9-Oct-03) • PACS QM manufacturing finished, no further updates beyond Issue 27 foreseen • Further requests/changes beyond Issue 27 are only possible via formal CR to PACS • Level 0 Sorption Cooler I/F not reflected in Issue 27 anymore (separate drawing needed by CEA) • Removing I/F-adapter (ECP#6) accepted by ESA and Industry Overview and Mechanical/Thermal IFs to FPU

  6. PACS Thermal I/Fs to SC Ge:Ga Level 0 Level 1 PhFPU Level 0 GeGa Level 0 I/F (2x) Pin I/F changed to rectangular I/F soldered to pin; Conduct resistance at I/F can be tuned to minimize heating of blue detector PhFPU/Cooler Level 0 I/F (2x) Level 1 Level 1 GeGa Level 0 Level 1 I/F (3x) Thread distance changed from 33 mm to 37 mm Overview and Mechanical/Thermal IFs to FPU

  7. Mechanical Loads to Level 0 Ge:Ga Detectors I/F • Amendment to CR, H-P-PACS-ME- 008 issued 29.Oct03, includes also updated mechanical load values for the Ge:Ga Detectors L0 I/F to be in line with the changed mechanical I/F (pin to flat mounting I/F): • Torque, longitudinal bending moment to central copper cold pin. < 1.8 Nm • Torque, rotation moment to the central copper cold pin < 0.2 Nm • Axial force to the central copper cold pin < 500 N • Lateral force to the central copper cold pin < 100 N • This IF loads regarded as uncritical • For the fixation of the straps a mounting tool is foreseen Overview and Mechanical/Thermal IFs to FPU

  8. Engineering Change at PACS Thermal Cooler L0 I/F • ECP PACS-ME-ECP 06, issued 27-July-03 agreed 16-Oct-03 • Reason for ECP: I/F temperature requirements of 1.85K at the end of the cooler recycling phase, acc. H-P-PACS-CR-0009, cannot be met -> 46h cooler hold time in question • Proposal (agreed): Remove I/F adapter; remaining contribution from PACS side to the overall thermal conductance (He-tank to Evaporator I/F) is now the contact resistance at the I/F to the cooler -> ~ 30% gained in thermal conductivity to the cooler I/F New Design Old Design Overview and Mechanical/Thermal IFs to FPU

  9. Mechanical Design at L0 Cooler I/F after ECP • Changed Mechanical I/F Design at PACS Cooler • S/C strap routing/ integration  • location of S/C temperature sensors  • Necessary design change on PhFPU side • rerouting PhFPU 2K strap  • shifting 2K feed through  • I/F baffle to reduce radiation environment  • performed already • CQM Parts manufactured !  • BUT: Mechanical loads from S/C ? PhFPU Feed Through PhFPU Baffles PhFPU Cooling Strap to Bolometer S/C Cooling Strap Evaporator S/C Temp. Sensors S/C Cooling Strap to Pump (cut in drawing, shown partly only) Overview and Mechanical/Thermal IFs to FPU

  10. Mechanical Loads to Level 0 Cooler I/F • Change Request to PACS IID-B: H-P-PACS-ME- 008, Issued 26-Nov-2001, I/F Loads identified as Single point failure • The mechanical loads arising from the level 0 cooling straps to the fixation points of the cooling straps at the PACS FPU must be limited. Impact of no-change: Damage of the mechanically sensitive thermal I/Fs during mounting and/or during launch can happen. • Static load: 50 N • Dynamic load: 50 grams (20.8G rms assumed) • CR was not processed further. Reason: missing final design of S/C level 0 cooling strap (under Industry responsibility) • Current Design for the S/C cooling strap: • ½ mass of cooling strap, pulling at the Level 0 I/F was 312 grams • New ½ mass acc. AIR LIQUIDE study could be 100-125 grams Overview and Mechanical/Thermal IFs to FPU

  11. Mechanical Loads to Level 0 Cooler I/F (cont.) • First results from FEE on cooler switch I/F done by CEA-SBT (01-Oct-03): • dynamical response of the switch,  (e.g. first eigenfrequency) depends on the additional mass fixed at the interface level: -50 grams, the first eigenfrequency is 194 Hz -100grams ........................................ 180 Hz -300 grams......................................... 140 Hz • maximum admissible mass at I/F could be potentially increased to 100 grams. TN on FEE calculation in preparation. • S/C cooling strap design needs to be balanced between conductance requirements (reduce cross section, change material TBC) and mechanical load requirements • MPE proposes to perform a coupled FEE analysis, to take into account the dynamic behaviour of the S/C cooling strap and to perform a cold vibration test in "full" configuration (PhFPU/cooler/cooler switch + strap) representative to the flight configuration • Amendment to CR, H-P-PACS-ME- 008 issued 29.Oct03, but 100 grams can not be guaranteed as long as no detailed FEE analysis is performed. Overview and Mechanical/Thermal IFs to FPU

  12. HERSCHEL L0 I/F Temperature to the Cooler Evaporator • Agreement reached on HERSCHEL Open Tank Solution, HERSCHEL L0 I/F meeting 30-Oct-03 @ESTEC Overview and Mechanical/Thermal IFs to FPU

  13. Estimation of PACS Level 0 I/F Temperatures in Orbit HERSCHEL Tank Temperature: 1.7K Material Pods: Al 1050 Open Pods: Open Tank Solution for the Evaporator I/F Conductance data taken from AIR LIQUIDE analysis HP-2-AIRL-AN-0004 *) Can be tuned at the I/F Overview and Mechanical/Thermal IFs to FPU

  14. Difference between Ground and Orbit • Tilt of Cryostat • The temperature of the cooler evaporator I/F at the end of the recycling phase defines the condensation efficiency of the 3He (hold time of the cooler) • The difference between on ground and in orbit is the convective effect. This only affects the recycling phase. Once the cooler is cold, orientation does not matter. • In orbit: We can assume the in-orbit case corresponds to a 60-90° tilting for the cryostat on ground. At the end of the recycling phase, the power flowing through the evaporator strap is 18 mW (measured 14 mW in the latest test). • On ground: If the cryostat can only be tilted 20°, the power flowing through the evaporator strap at the end of the recycling phase can extrapolate to be about 30-35 mW !!! Overview and Mechanical/Thermal IFs to FPU

  15. Difference between Ground and Orbit (cont.) • Herschel Tank Temperature Orbit: 1.7K Ground (IMT): 1.7K to 1.8K • Temperature shift at cooler I/F up to 100mK due to warm up after days • L1 Temperature (~PACS FPU temperature) Orbit: 3K to 3.5K Ground(IMT): 6.3K to 7.3K • Thermal load from L1 to L0 through switch base increased (0.45mW -> ~2mW) • Impact to hold time (needs further assessment using measured values) • Impact on the Net heat lift at 300mK (needs further assessment using measured values) • Thermal Radiation Environment Orbit: 9K –10K Ground (IMT): 8K – 10K • 5- 6 K, no impact expected, for 10 K we don't know (hard to calculate) • cooler is pretty much covered by protective baffles and caps (best we could do) It is assumed the heat sink to the cryostat drops back down to 1.8 K once the condensation phase is completed Overview and Mechanical/Thermal IFs to FPU

  16. Estimation of PACS Level 0 I/F Temperatures IMT Tank Temperature: 1.75K Thermal radiation environment: 8K-10K, not taken into account Level 1 temperature unknown: 6.3K to 7.3K, not taken into account Conductance data taken from AIR LIQUITE analysis HP-2-AIRL-AN-0004, Al 1050 *) Can be tuned at the I/F Overview and Mechanical/Thermal IFs to FPU

  17. Estimation of PACS Level 0 I/F Temperatures EQM Tank Temperature: unknown, used also 1.65K Thermal radiation environment: unknown, should be 5K Level 1 temperature unknown: unknown, should be around 4K to 5K Conductance data taken from AIR LIQUITE analysis HP-2-AIRL-AN-0004 *) Can be tuned at the I/F Overview and Mechanical/Thermal IFs to FPU

  18. Summery on PACS Level 0 I/F Temperatures • In Orbit • With the “Open Tank Solution” and with Al 1050 for the HERSCHEL tank pods, PACS Temperature requirements on the L0 I/Fs can by fulfilled. • On Ground • It is not clear whether the PACS cooler can be recycled and/or run at 0.3mK with sufficient cooling power during IMT test. • With a cryostat tilt of more than 20 degree, the situation can be improved by a factor 2.3 (for recycling only) • IMT/EQM testing and testing conditions needs further assessments to be performed by all parties. • Lionel Duband (CEA) needs to perform further calculations (tests?) using new validated boundary temperatures for the Ground test. Overview and Mechanical/Thermal IFs to FPU

More Related