1 / 37

Ho- Meoyng Choi( Kyungpook National Univ., Korea)

Self-consistent covariant description of twist-3 distribution amplitudes of pseudoscalar and vector mesons in the light-front quark model. Ho- Meoyng Choi( Kyungpook National Univ., Korea). (in collaboration with C.-R. Ji ) . Outline. Motivation

chavi
Download Presentation

Ho- Meoyng Choi( Kyungpook National Univ., Korea)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Self-consistent covariant description of twist-3 distribution amplitudes of pseudoscalar and vector mesons in the light-front quark model Ho-Meoyng Choi(Kyungpook National Univ., Korea) (in collaboration with C.-R. Ji) Outline • Motivation • 2. Model Calculation in Manifestly Covariant Model and Light-Front Quark Model(LFQM) • - Twist-2 and-3 Distribution Amplitudes(DAs) of pseudoscalar and vector mesons • 3. Numerical Results • 4. Conclusion Based on PRD89,033011(14) & the work in progress Light Cone 2014, Raleigh (May 26~30, 2014)

  2. 1. Motivation •Light-Front Dynamics(LFD) has been quite successful in describing various hadron properties. • But it has been emphasized that the treacherous points(e.g. zero modes) should be taken into account for successful LFD applications to hadron phenomenology.[Jaus 99; Cheng,Chua,Hwang (CCH)04; de Melo, Frederico 97,12; CJ,PRD89(14),80(09);NPA865(11);PLB695,518(11)] Representative Examples: Two-point function (e.g. Decay constant) Three-point function (e.g. Form factors) p=P-k P • In our previous work(CJ 09,11,14), we identified the zero-mode operator & found a way to include it effectively in the valence diagram within the manifestly covariant Bethe-Salpeter(BS) model. But the zero-mode may depend on the LF vertex function. k • The purpose of this work is to build LFQM, which provides an effective treatment of the zero-mode.

  3. • Nature of the LF zero-mode in the meson decay amplitude Pick up a LF energy pole LF projection p=P-k P k If this contribution does not vanish, we must capture it! Zero mode !

  4. • Nature of the LF zero-mode in the meson decay amplitude Pick up a LF energy pole LF projection p=P-k P k • Zero-mode issue of is highly nontrivial & deserves careful analysis! If this contribution does not vanish, we must capture it! Zero mode !

  5. • The purpose of this work is to build LFQM, which provides an effective treatment of the zero-mode. • Manifestly Covariant BS model • LFQM (standard LF approach) - To provide phenomenological model! take advantage of BS model - To provide theoretical guidance! know how to find the Z.M. ) Melosh transformation To absorb the zero-mode complication into the effective constituent degree of freedom, we attempt to find matching condition between BS model and LFQM:

  6. 2. Schematic Picture of Covariant BS Model vs. LFQM Manifestly Covariant BS model: Covariant calculation! BS model on the LF: Z.M. = p=P-k + valence P If k + (propagating) (instantaneous)

  7. Our main findings in LFBS model & in the standard LFQM application: LFBS model: = Z.M. We know how to identify the zero-mode operator and include it in the valence diagram! (CJ 14) p=P-k + P k + Application to LFQM Using Gaussian W.F.:

  8. Our main findings in LFBS model & in the standard LFQM application: LFBS model: = Z.M. = p=P-k p=P-k + + LFQM: P P k k + + Z.M.

  9. Why treacherous points disappear in LFQM? Z.M. = p=P-k + P Need further constraint! k + While

  10. LFBS model: = Z.M. Matching Condition: LFQM: p=P-k p=P-k + “Main ingredients” to support the self-consistency of Our LFQM! = P P k k + Constraint: (Twist-2 & twist-3) Meson DAs

  11. (A) Twist-2 and-3 Meson DAs: Pion Twist-2: Twist-3: where • Normalization constant results from quark condensate via : Gell-Mann-Oakes-Renner relation

  12. Decay Constant & twist-2 of Pion • LF covariant method (BS model) • SLF method (LFQM) Z.M. free! Matching condition:

  13. Twist-3 :zero-mode operator! (Jaus 99, CJ09,11,14)

  14. LFBS model: + = + Z.M. p=P-k p=P-k LFQM: P P k k =

  15. LFQM: = While p=P-k P k : Constraint on LFQM! But

  16. Twist-3 DA of pion in LFQM: Twist-2 DA of pion in LFQM: Preliminary

  17. (B) Twist-2 and-3 Meson DAs: meson PRD89,033011(14) by CJ () To isolate twist-2 & twist-3

  18. Twist-2 LFBS: + LFQM:

  19. Twist-3 LFBS: + LFQM:

  20. & in LFQM with Gaussian w.f. : But… ρ PRD89,033011(14) by CJ

  21. 3. Numerical Results Indeed, we generalized to the unequal Input: All others are predictions! (in unit of GeV) “Predicted twist-2 DAs …” PRD75,034199(07) CJ

  22. Momentum dependence of LFWF: Preliminary (c.f. SR by Zhitnitsky 94) Cut off scale:

  23. Kaon: Preliminary

  24. Twist-3 pion & Kaon DAs: (Ball, Braun, Lenz,06) (Ball, Braun, Lenz,06) Preliminary limit for HO (Linear) c.f.) Standard:

  25. Gegenbauer & moments: Pion TW3(A): CJ, Preliminary TW2(A): CJ, PRD(07)

  26. Kaon TW3(A): CJ, Preliminary TW2(A): CJ, PRD(07)

  27. Twist-2 & twist-3 vector DAs: limit CJ, PRD89,033011(14)

  28. moments for (): The numbers in ( ) for the give the asymptotic values. CJ, PRD89,033011(14)

  29. 4.Conclusions • • In this work, we extended the analysis of meson from the manifestly covariant • BS model to the more realistic standard LFQM through the following matching condition • between BS model and LFQM : • In the standard LFQM, we are able to describe the decay amplitude only • in terms of valence diagram with the on-mass-shell quark propagators but respecting • chiral symmetryof QCD. • Our twist-2 and twist-3 DAs not only satisfy the fundamental symmetry anticipated • isospin symmetry but also reproduce the correct asymptotic DAs in the chiral limit. • •Our LFQM may provide the view of an effective zero-mode cloud around the quark • and antiquark inside the meson. Consequently, the constituents dressed by the zero-mode • cloud may be expected to satisfy the chiral symmetry of QCD. • Need more observables to make our findings generalize! - Other higher twist DAs, electroweak form factors etc.

  30. Back Up Slide

  31. Covariant vs. Light-Front Calculation for E&M form factor of pion + = on-mass-shell

  32. + = + x 1-x (propagating) (instantaneous)

  33. LF Zero-mode: Effective inclusion of zero-mode in the valence region: zero-mode operator Power counting in Jaus99, Choi&Ji 09

  34. (A) Pion Electromagnetic form factor + = + x (1) Manifestly Covariant BS Model Calculation: 1-x (

  35. (2) Standard LF Calculation (LFQM) and Correspondence between BS model and LFQM ) () : Correspondence between BS model and LFQM (

  36. For perpendicular components of the current: BS model: ( BS model + = + x 1-x

  37. LFQM: + = + x 1-x LFQM In our LFQM, only on-shell quarks contribute to for both !

More Related