270 likes | 477 Views
Landscape services : an indispensable concept for modern landscape monitoring programs. Felix Kienast Jacqueline Frick Jochen Jäger 1 , Christian Schwick Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL/ETHZ 1 Concordia University, Montreal, Canada . Landscape monitoring.
E N D
Landscapeservices: an indispensable conceptfor modern landscapemonitoringprograms Felix Kienast Jacqueline Frick Jochen Jäger1, Christian Schwick Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL/ETHZ 1Concordia University, Montreal, Canada
Landscapemonitoring • Landscapemonitoringmeasuresthecapacityoflandscapestodeliverservicesover time • ( landscapeservices) • Itis a must forlandscapemanagementandsuggestedbythe European LandscapeConvention • ( LandscapeObservatories)
Landscapemonitoring • Goodnews: • Numerouslandscapecharacterassessments (LCA) areavailable Wascher et al. (2005)
Landscapemonitoring • Goodnews: • Numerouslandscapecharacterassessments (LCA) areavailable • Bad news: • Many LCAs consistof 1 time steponly, nomonitorings • Frequentlybiasedtowardsnatureinventories • Oftenunabletoaccomodatetheholisticnotion„landscape“ • Manymonitoringsarenot embedded in thelandscapeserviceor EGS paradigm
Countryside Quality Counts Haines-Young (2005)
Conceptofthe Swiss Landscape Monitoring Program Physical landscape Evolutionary determined landscape perception (Kaplan&Kaplan) Land-use Culturally determined landscape perception Kienast et al. in press
Conceptofthe Swiss Landscape Monitoring Program Physical landscape Evolutionary determined landscape perception (Kaplan&Kaplan) Land-use Culturally determined landscape perception LandscapeIndicators Kienast et al. in press
Conceptofthe Swiss Landscape Monitoring Program Landscapeservices / ecologicalintegrity Physical landscape Evolutionary determined landscape perception (Kaplan&Kaplan) Land-use Culturally determined landscape perception LandscapeIndicators Kienast et al. in press
Conceptofthe Swiss Landscape Monitoring Program Landscapeservices / ecologicalintegrity Physical landscape Evolutionary determined landscape perception (Kaplan&Kaplan) Land-use Culturally determined landscape perception LandscapeIndicators Kienast et al. in press
Services assessedbythe Swiss landscapemonitoring Cultural heritage Provisioning Numberofindicators Regulating
Urban permeation Indicatormeasures „soilconsumption“ (ecologicalintegrity / EGS) • Indicatorcombines: • Area ofbuildings • Dispersion ofbuildings • Numberofinhabitants • (themoreconcentratedthebuildingsandthehigherthelandutilization, thelowertheindex) Jaeger, Bertiller, Schwick, Kienast 2010a,b, Ecol. Indicators
Urban permeation 1935 Low High Schwick, unpublished
Urban permeation 1960 Low High Schwick, unpublished
Urban permeation 1980 Low High Schwick, unpublished
Urban permeation 2002 Low High Schwick, unpublished
Urban permeation 2010 Low High Schwick, unpublished
Fragmentation Indicatormeasures „provisionofsuitablehabitat“ (ecologicalintegrity / EGS)
Light emmissions Indicatormeasures „provisionofsuitablehabitat“ & „health- andrecreationrelatedlandscapeservices“ % areawithcompletenightdarkness Mountain regions Densely populated Plateau & Jura Defense MeteorologicalSatelliteProgram (DMSP); Operational Linescan System (OLS).
Getting an ideaofpeople‘slandscapeexperience • Sampling in 2011in threelanguages G, F, I • 8700 households (35% returned) • Respondentsassessedthelandscape in theirmunicipality • 38 questionstothefollowingperceptionconcepts: • Questionstopreferredlandscapeelements • Coherence • Complexity • Uniqueness • Mysteriosity • Fascination • Legibility • Authenticity
Questions per perceptionconcept • Landscape beauty: Is the landscape beautiful? (4 questions) • Diversity: • Complexity: Are there many things? (4q) • Coherence: Do things fit together? (4 q) • Landscape character: • a) Uniqueness: Is the landscape unique? (3 q) • b) Cultural heritage: Are there signs of former land(scape) use? (3 q) • Mysteriosity:Am I able to discover things? (5 q) • Legibility: Does the landscape support my orientation? (5 q) • Fascination:Isthelandscapeinterestingandunusual? (6 q) • Authenticity:Towhatdegreedoesthelandscapefit theregion‘scharacter? (4 q)
Example: Fascination (Isthelandscapeinterestingandunusual?) Community type: rural-agrarian mixedagrarian rural-commuter industrial touristic periurban rich suburban urban medium Degreeofappreciationhigh
Example: Authenticity (Towhatdegreedoesthelandscapefit theregion‘scharacter?) Community type: rural-agrarian mixedagrarian rural-commuter industrial touristic periurban rich suburban urban medium Degreeofappreciationhigh
Take homemessage • Goodnews / badnews :-) • Onemorelandscapecharacterassessment (LCA)! • Goodnewscontinued: • Swiss landscapemonitoringisindeed a monitoringinvolving different time steps • Holistic in characterandassessesbothnaturalandperceivedaspectsof „landscape“ • embedded in thelandscapeserviceparadigm • Methodologycanbegenerallyadapted
Landscapeservices • Ecosystemserviceassessmentsextendedtoaccomodatethenotion „landscape“ byincludingcontextandperceivedlandscapecharacteristics landscapeservices LandscapestructureEcosystemserviceLandscapeservice Treepatchestimberwoodlandlandscape
Urban permeation(measures „soilconsumption“) • Innovative & widelyacceptedindicators • Index amalgamates: • Area ofbuildings • Dispersion ofbuildings • Numberofinhabitants • (themoreconcentratedthebuildingsandthehigherthelandutilization, thelowertheindex) Weighted urban proliferation WUP = Asettle * g1(DIS) * g2(LU) * DIS Areportunit Jaeger, Bertiller, Schwick, Kienast 2010a,b, Ecol. Indicators