60 likes | 207 Views
Group 1 – Cochise, Pima, Santa Cruz, Greenlee, Graham Group 2 – Coconino, Apache, Navajo County & Nation & Hopi Tribes Group 3 – Mohave, Yavapai Group 4 – Yuma, La Paz Group 5 – Gila, Pinal Group 6 – Glendale, Peoria, El Mirage, Surprise
E N D
Group 1 – Cochise, Pima, Santa Cruz, Greenlee, Graham • Group 2 – Coconino, Apache, Navajo County & Nation & Hopi Tribes • Group 3 – Mohave, Yavapai • Group 4 – Yuma, La Paz • Group 5 – Gila, Pinal • Group 6 – Glendale, Peoria, El Mirage, Surprise • Group 7 – Avondale, Goodyear, Litchfield Park, Buckeye, Wickenburg, Laveen, Tolleson • Group 8 – Tempe, Scottsdale, Guadalupe • Group 9 – Mesa, Gilbert, Chandler, Queen Creek, Apache Junction, Higley • Group 10 – Phoenix
Demographics • The demographics of every community is different. Let’s create a common understanding of the populations you serve. • Introduce yourself and your organization’s primary focus. • What specific needs will your constituency have in an emergency/disaster? • What resources do you need most in a disaster? • What resources does your organization have to offer?
Inclusive & Collaborative Relationships • Taking your group’s demographics into consideration, what does an inclusive & collaborative relationship look like? • Who is involved, what resources are needed, what format or forum does it need to take place in? • Is it part of a government, a coalition of service providers, or outside of the government completely. • Who should lead these efforts?
Overcoming Roadblocks • What are the biggest challenges to inclusive & collaborative relationships? • What roadblocks do you see in the development of these committees and collaboration relationships and how do alleviate and mitigate it? • Having identified needs and resources to meet those needs, what additional resources are needed to fill the gaps in the needs that haven’t been fulfilled. • How do you maximize available resources to meet current and unaddressed needs
What Steps are you Willing to Take • What do you think is a feasible way forward? How can you carry the conversations and relationships gained at this conference back to your community? • Who is identified to be responsible for organizing a recurring conversation, is someone willing to take ownership of this issue? • Who is not at the “planning table” today that should be included and who will be responsible for reaching out to those individuals? • Is this an organized, formal structure?
Hot Wash • What did you like about this conference? • What did you not like about this conference? • Should we do it again? • If so, prioritize the top three issues that you feel we should focus on?