160 likes | 314 Views
You’ve Been Shopped! Mystery Shopping for Better Service. The UCF Libraries Experience Marcus Kilman. Tools for better customer service:. Hiring the right people Training Department internal training UCF training Other OPAC/Database training Reference Interview training
E N D
You’ve Been Shopped! Mystery Shopping for Better Service The UCF Libraries Experience Marcus Kilman
Tools for better customer service: • Hiring the right people • Training • Department internal training • UCF training • Other • OPAC/Database training • Reference Interview training • Printer/Copier service training • Empowerment
Tools for better customer service (cont): • Judgment • Mutual Trust • Job Satisfaction • Feedback • Surveys • Suggestions/Comments Box (also online) • Open Door policy • Mystery Shopper
Mystery Shopping at UCF • Available through UCF Human Resources’ Office of Organization Development & Training • Developed and facilitated by training consultant Marjorie Chusmir • Circulation Department has completed two Mystery Shopper surveys (May 2006 and October 2007)
Planning the Mystery Shopper surveys • First survey preceded by the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator session • Met with facilitators to define various shopper interactions • Interactions were both in-person and telephone • Interactions were designed to be “problem patrons”
Example “shopper” interactions: • As a student, attempt to check out video or book without UCF ID • Call circulation desk with book title and ask staff to retrieve book and hold at desk • Try to check out a book using driver’s license only, claiming to be local resident who “pays taxes” • Ask at the circulation desk to reserve a study room
Measures of success: • In person • Customer awareness • Customer Service • Over the phone • Greeting • Friendliness • Service • All interactions were anonymous
Scale of measure: • Strength = interaction was rated high overall • Needs improvement = some elements were rated high and others were not • Strong Development Need = most elements were rated low
First survey results: • In-Person: • Customer Awareness = Strength • Customer Service = Needs Improvement • Over the Phone: • Greeting = Strength • Friendliness = Needs Improvement • Service = Needs Improvement
Recommendations: • Staff form 3 groups to develop strategies to address: • Friendliness (be “warm and friendly” not just “polite and professional”) • Phone etiquette (formalize procedures for answering and transferring calls, referring when necessary, importance of attitude) • Service (attention to details, thoroughness)
Second survey measures: • Measures of success were: • In-person • Customer awareness • Customer service • Policy Adherence • Over the phone • Greeting • Friendliness • Service • Policy Adherence
Scale of measure: • Strength = interaction was rated high overall • Opportunity for improvement = some elements were rated high and others were not • Strong Development Need = most elements were rated low
Second survey results: • In-person • Customer awareness = Strength • Customer service = Opportunity • Policy Adherence = Strength • Over the phone • Greeting = Opportunity • Friendliness = Opportunity • Service = Strength • Policy Adherence = Strength
Recommendations: • Staff continue to work on “warm and friendly” versus “polite and professional”
Conclusions: • Mystery Shopper surveys produced no “big surprises” • Mystery Shopper surveys are useful when used in conjunction with other feedback and survey tools • We will continue to use the Mystery Shopper surveys on an irregular basis • Ask for more “aggressive” shoppers
Contact information: Marcus Kilman mkilman@mail.ucf.edu (407) 823-2527