190 likes | 427 Views
Convergence of Accounting Standards and the IASB Process. Gilbert Gelard, Member of IASB Bucharest, May 2003. Harmonisation? No Convergence? Yes. Harmonisation. European Directives of the 1970’s aimed at harmonisation Did not succeed
E N D
Convergence of Accounting Standards and the IASB Process Gilbert Gelard, Member of IASB Bucharest, May 2003
Harmonisation? No • Convergence? Yes
Harmonisation European Directives of the 1970’s aimed at harmonisation Did not succeed Hence, choice of a single set of standards for Europe (2002 – 2005) to ensure a level playing field for listed companies
Why harmonisation failed • A bottom-up approach • No conceptual basis • No real desire to move from one’s habits • Too much linkage with taxation and law Little progress, uneven playing field
Convergence Aim: One single set of standards Means: Partnership between IASB and (key) National Standard Setters through: • Joint projects • Monitoring • Enhancement of communication
Requirement for convergence of accounting standards • Sharing a common conceptual framework • Working under effective partnership(s) • Choosing the best alternative, whatever its origin is • Mechanism for consistent interpretations Consistent accounting standards
Requirement for consistency and convergence in practice • Having compulsory consistent accounting standards and • A strong enforcement, including strong • Regulation (law, market, regulation) • Auditing (competence, independence, oversight) • Governance Standards can achieve nothing by themselves. Enforcement is the key
IASC Foundation & International Accounting Standards Board The Organisation
IASC Foundation Structure IASC Foundation (19 Trustees) Standards Advisory Council IFRIC Interpretations Committee IASB 12 Full time 2 Part time Advisory Groups 21 Tech.Staff
Logistics • Monthly IASB meetings • Regular meetings with 8 liaison standard setters • SAC meetings: 3 times per year • IFRIC meetings: 6 times per year
FASB UK Canada France Australia Germany NZ Japan Liaison Standard-setters
Partnering Arrangements • Bi-lateral between IASB and 1 of liaison standard-setters • Lead, support and monitoring roles • Commitment to accept outputs
Process • Full due processes, as applied by national standard-setters • Partnering arrangements with liaison standard-setters
IASB outputs for the first two years up to May 2003 Exposure Drafts • Improvements to twelve standards • Amendments to IAS32 – IAS39 • First time adoption ED1 • Share based payments ED2 • Business Combinations* ED3 * with consequential amendments to Impairment and to Intangible Assets
IASB Expected out put up to March 2004* Standards* • IFRS 1: First time adoption • Business combinations I • Share based payments • Insurance contracts (phase I) • Improvements to twelve standards • Amendments to IAS32 – IAS39 Exposure Drafts • Performance reporting • Business combinations II • Deposit taking, lending and securities activities • With a view to implementation in Europe as of January 2005
SME’s and Emerging Markets • Option to member states to extend IFRS’s beyond the consolidated accounts of limited companies • The IASB has recently formed a group to deal with the very difficult issue of SME’s. Very preliminary stage