1 / 30

Evaluating Sources: Overview

Evaluating Sources: Overview. Evaluating sources of information is an important step in any research activity. This section provides information on evaluating bibliographic citations, aspects of evaluation, reading evaluation, print vs. Internet sources, and evaluating Internet sources.

chesna
Download Presentation

Evaluating Sources: Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evaluating Sources: Overview

  2. Evaluating sources of information is an important step in any research activity. • This section provides information on evaluating bibliographic citations, aspects of evaluation, reading evaluation, print vs. • Internet sources, and evaluating Internet sources.

  3. Evaluating Sources: Overview • The world is full of information to be found—however, not all of it is valid, useful, or accurate. Evaluating sources of information that you are considering using in your writing is an important step in any research activity. • The quantity of information available is so overwhelming that we cannot know everything about a subject. For example, it's estimated that anyone attempting to research what's known about depression would have to read over 100,000 studies on the subject. And there's the problem of trying to decide which studies have produced reliable results. • Similarly, for information on other topics, not only is there a huge quantity available but with a very uneven level of quality.

  4. Evaluating sources is an important skill. It's been called an art as well as work—much of which is detective work. You have to decide where to look, what clues to search for, and what to accept. You may be overwhelmed with too much information or too little. The temptation is to accept whatever you find. But don't be tempted. Learning how to evaluate effectively is a skill you need both for your course papers and for your life. • When writing research papers, you will also be evaluating sources as you search for information. • You will need to make decisions about what to search for, where to look, and once you've found material on your topic, if it is a valid or useful source for your writing.

  5. Evaluating Bibliographic Citations • When searching for information in library catalogues and online article databases such as EbscoHost or Proquest Direct, you will first find a bibliographic citation entry. A bibliographic citation provides relevant information about the author and publication as well as short summary of the text. • Before you read a source or spend time hunting for it, begin by looking at the following information in the citation to evaluate whether it's worth finding or reading. • Consider the author, the title of the work, the summary, where it is, and the timeliness of the entry. You may also want to look at the keywords to see what other categories the work falls into. Evaluate this information to see if it is relevant and valid for your research.

  6. Evaluation During Reading • After you have asked yourself some questions about the source and determined that it's worth your time to find and read that source, you can evaluate the material in the source as you read through it. • Read the preface--What does the author want to accomplish? Browse through the table of contents and the index. This will give you an overview of the source. Is your topic covered in enough depth to be helpful? If you don't find your topic discussed, try searching for some synonyms in the index. • Check for a list of references or other citations that look as if they will lead you to related material that would be good sources.

  7. Determine the intended audience. Are you the intended audience? Consider the tone, style, level of information, and assumptions the author makes about the reader. Are they appropriate for your needs? • Try to determine if the content of the source is fact, opinion, or propaganda. If you think the source is offering facts, are the sources for those facts clearly indicated? • Do you think there's enough evidence offered? Is the coverage comprehensive? (As you learn more and more about your topic, you will notice that this gets easier as you become more of an expert.)

  8. Is the language objective or emotional? • Are there broad generalizations that overstate or oversimplify the matter? • Does the author use a good mix of primary and secondary sources for information? • If the source is opinion, does the author offer sound reasons for adopting that stance? (Consider again those questions about the author. Is this person reputable?) • Check for accuracy.

  9. How timely is the source? Is the source twenty years out of date? Some information becomes dated when new research is available, but other older sources of information can be quite sound fifty or a hundred years later. • Do some cross-checking. Can you find some of the same information given elsewhere? • How credible is the author? If the document is anonymous, what do you know about the organization? • Are there vague or sweeping generalizations that aren't backed up with evidence? • Are arguments very one-sided with no acknowledgement of other viewpoints?

  10. Evaluating Print vs. Internet Sources • With the advent of the World Wide Web, we are seeing a massive influx of digital texts and sources. Understanding the difference between what you can find on the Web and what you can find in more traditional print sources is key to evaluating your sources. • Some sources such as journal or newspaper articles can be found in both print and digital format. However, much of what is found on the Internet does not have a print equivalent, and hence, has low or no quality standards for publication. Understanding the difference between the types of resources available will help you evaluate what you find.

  11. Publication process • Print Sources: Traditional print sources go through an extensive publication process that includes editing and article review. The process has fact-checkers, multiple reviewers, and editors to ensure quality of publication. • Internet Sources: Anyone with a computer and access to the Internet can publish a Web site or electronic document. Most Web documents do not have editors, fact-checkers, or other types of reviewers.

  12. Authorship and affiliations • Print Sources: Print sources clearly indicate who the author is, what organization(s) he or she is affiliated with, and when his or her work was published. • Internet Sources: Authorship and affiliations are difficult to determine on the Internet. Some sites may have author and sponsorship listed, but many do not.

  13. Sources and quotations • Print Sources: In most traditional publications, external sources of information and direct quotations are clearly marked and identified. • Internet Sources: Sources the author used or referred to in the text may not be clearly indicated in an Internet source.

  14. Bias and special interests • Print Sources: While bias certainly exists in traditional publications, printing is more expensive and difficult to accomplish. Most major publishers are out to make a profit and will either not cater to special interest groups or will clearly indicate when they are catering to special interest groups. • Internet Sources: The purpose of the online text may be misleading. A Web site that appears to be factual may actually be persuasive and/or deceptive.

  15. Author qualifications • Print Sources: Qualifications of an author are almost always necessary for print sources. Only qualified authors are likely to have their manuscripts accepted for publication. • Internet Sources: Even if the author and purpose of a website can be determined, the qualifications of the author are not always given.

  16. Publication information • Print Sources: Publication information such as date of publication, publisher, author, and editor are always clearly listed in print publications. • Internet Sources: Dates of publication and timeliness of information are questionable on the Internet. Dates listed on Web sites could be the date posted, date updated, or a date may not be listed at all.

  17. Give some tips how to evaluate a source:

  18. Articles • Is biographical information for the author provided? • Who is the publisher? • How frequently is the periodical published? • How many and what kinds of advertisements are present? For example, is the advertising clearly geared towards readers in a specific discipline or occupation? • For more specific guidelines in identifying periodical types see:Is it scholarly? Distinguishing periodical typesFor help with online articles see: Is it scholarly? Distinguishing periodical types online .

  19. Web pages • What is the domain of the page? • Who is publishing or sponsoring the page? • Strip back the URL to discover the source of the page. • Is contact information for the author/publisher provided? • How recently was the page updated? • Be particularly wary of bias when viewing web pages. Anyone can create a web page about any topic. YOU must verify the validity of the information. • For more specific guidelines in evaluating web pages see: Evaluating Internet Sources

  20. Tips for determining online scholarly sources

  21. Source Title • Don't let the word Journal influence your decision too strongly. Although the word Journal is often an indicator of a scholarly publication, it doesn't guarantee it. (Think in particular of titles such as Ladies Home Journal, a popular magazine.) • Does the title indicate the periodical is geared toward a very specific and limited audience? These titles are often trade publications and contain information that will assist practitioners in a specific field learn more about their work. For example, Social Studies Teacher and American School Board Journal are both geared toward very specific audiences, as their titles indicate.

  22. Publication Frequency • Winter, Spring, Summer, Fall - Scholarly publications often have a quarterly publication frequency, so those items that indicate an issue as Winter, Spring, Summer or Fall will most likely be scholarly journals. • Weekly publication date - An indicator that a publication is probably not a scholarly journal would be a publication date that includes a month, date and year. For example: March 4, 2010 or 11/25/2011. A date that appears in this manner generally indicates a periodical that is published on a weekly or bi-weekly basis, which is rarely characteristic of a scholarly journal.

  23. Article Length • Scholarly journal articles are longer. Articles in scholarly journals, particularly research articles, will often be in excess of ten pages. Although there may be articles in scholarly journals that are one to two pages, these tend to be news releases or book reviews, and would not be the type of article you would use in a research essay. • Professional/trade publication articles vary in length. Articles in trade publications have varying lengths, some will be longer research articles, but others may be very short. • Popular magazine articles are shortest. Articles in popular magazines tend to be short (under five pages).

  24. Authors • Are author names listed? If there is no author name it is likely a popular magazine. • Are there multiple authors? Often articles in scholarly journals will include a group of authors. • Are author credentials included? (i.e. PhD or MD) Consistent use of credential indicates the likelihood it is a scholarly journal. The inclusion of credentials for some, but not all, articles indicates its is probably a professional publication.

  25. Supplementary Items • Charts, graphs, tables - Does the record indicate there are supplementary items such as charts, tables or graphs included? The presence of these items will often indicate scholarly journal articles, particularly if there are multiples of such items. • Photographs - Does the record indicate there are photographs included? Photographs are most frequently included in popular and trade publications.

  26. EXERCISE: • You're writing a research paper on the problem of homelessness in your town or city. Which of the following sources would be a primary source for you and which a secondary?

  27. 1. A report from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities: "Drifting Apart: New Findings on Growing Income Disparities Between the Rich, the Poor, and the Middle Class," 1990? • 2. An interview with two homeless persons in your town? • 3. A book entitled "The Undeserving Poor: From the War on Poverty to the War on Welfare," by Michael Katz, 1989? • 4. An article entitled, "The Culture of Poverty," in" On Understanding Poverty: Perspectives from the Social Sciences"? • 5. An interview with a sociology professor who teaches a course that explores the problem of homelessness?

  28. Below are five exercises designed to improve your ability to select a good research thesis. Choose the best working thesis among each set for the proposed research paper. • Thesis A: There are many causes of anorexia nervosa. • Thesis B: Anorexia nervosa has both emotional and social causes which work hand-in-hand. • Thesis C: Anorexia nervosa occurs most often in young women aged 13-22.

  29. Thesis A: Business practices in former Soviet Union countries. • Thesis B: Business practices in the countries of the former Soviet Union have changed drastically since the break-up. • Thesis C: Since the break-up of the former Soviet Union, business practices in those countries have changed most in the fields of marketing and customer service, reflecting the changes in government and political philosophy.

  30. Give some tips how to evaluate a source from: • Article • Web pages

More Related