1 / 33

Hydrological networks beneath Antarctica: New signals from altimetry

Hydrological networks beneath Antarctica: New signals from altimetry Duncan Wingham 1 , Andrew Shepherd 2 , Martin Siegert 3 , Alan Muir 1 Centre for Polar Observation and Modelling 1 University College London 2 Scott Polar Research Institute 3 University of Bristol. Radio echo soundings.

chesna
Download Presentation

Hydrological networks beneath Antarctica: New signals from altimetry

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Hydrological networks beneath Antarctica: New signals from altimetry Duncan Wingham1, Andrew Shepherd2, Martin Siegert3 , Alan Muir1 Centre for Polar Observation and Modelling 1University College London 2Scott Polar Research Institute 3University of Bristol

  2. Radio echo soundings

  3. Subglacial lakes

  4. Elevation trend

  5. Elevation trend

  6. Lowering hydrograph

  7. 10 km2 elevation trend

  8. Raising hydrograph

  9. Hydrograph

  10. Cartoon

  11. Subglacial hydrology

  12. Subglacial hydrology

  13. Lake topography

  14. Lake area Area ~ 600 km2 Deflation ~ 3 m Volume ~ 1.8 km3 Q ~ 50 m3 s-1

  15. Lake area Area ~ 600 km2 Deflation ~ 3 m Volume ~ 1.8 km3 Q ~ 50 m3 s-1

  16. Hydraulic model • Uphill flow forced by overburden • Ice modelled as two heavy plugs • Walls generate shear forces TL and TU opposing flow

  17. Hydraulic model • Uphill flow forced by overburden • Ice modelled as two heavy plugs • Walls generate shear forces TL and TU opposing flow Force balance Df=hydraulic potential across tunnel =1.5 x 106 Pa

  18. Hydraulic model • Uphill flow forced by overburden • Ice modelled as two heavy plugs • Walls generate shear forces TL and TU opposing flow Force balance Df=hydraulic potential across tunnel =1.5 x 106 Pa Rothlisberger channel geometry Q=50 m3 s-1 S = 26 m2

  19. Hydraulic model • Uphill flow forced by overburden • Ice modelled as two heavy plugs • Walls generate shear forces TL and TU opposing flow Force balance Df=hydraulic potential across tunnel =1.5 x 106 Pa Rothlisberger channel geometry Q=50 m3 s-1 S = 26 m2 Nye’s jökulhlaup closure rate dS/dt < 0 if peff > 590 kPa >> DpL = 26 kPa i.e. closure unlikely

  20. What role is the roof playing?

  21. Potential Energy released ~ 2 X 1015 J What role is the roof playing?

  22. Potential Energy released Energy used in heating water ~ 2 X 1015 J ~ 2 X 1011 J What role is the roof playing?

  23. Potential Energy released Energy used in heating water Energy used in deforming ice ~ 2 X 1015 J ~ 2 X 1011 J ~ 2 X 1013 J What role is the roof playing?

  24. Potential Energy released Energy used in heating water Energy used in deforming ice ~ 2 X 1015 J ~ 2 X 1011 J ~ 2 X 1013 J What role is the roof playing? Tunnel area according to energy ~ 28 m2 Cf. Channel Theory ~ 26 m2

  25. Potential Energy released Energy used in heating water Energy used in deforming ice ~ 2 X 1015 J ~ 2 X 1011 J ~ 2 X 1013 J What role is the roof playing? Tunnel area according to energy ~ 28 m2 Cf. Channel Theory ~ 26 m2 Roof is playing a small role

  26. Other signals within hydrograph

  27. Other signals within hydrograph How many channels? Single channel velocity of 2.1 ms-1, or 1.6 days transit time.

  28. Other signals within hydrograph How many channels? Single channel velocity of 2.1 ms-1, or 1.6 days transit time. What shape are channels? Semi-circular channel has a -t-3 rise

  29. Other signals within hydrograph How many channels? Single channel velocity of 2.1 ms-1, or 1.6 days transit time. What shape are channels? Semi-circular channel has a -t-3 rise How frequent are outbursts Upstream catchment = 50,000 km2 Basal melt rate = 1 mm yr-1 Periodicity ~ 36 years

  30. Implications • Lakes not closed, but regularly flushed • Periodicity far shorter than ice sheet lifetime • Large lakes (e.g. Vostok, 5400 km3) pose considerable threat • Mechanism may be related to Dansgaard-Oeschger events • Outbursts affect lake habitats • Periodic exchange reduces gas solute • Impacts on microbial diversity • Complicates isotopic analyses • Exploration risks contaminating downstream lakes

More Related