280 likes | 431 Views
Sally Obenski and Jim Farber U.S. Census Bureau CNSTAT Panel January 26, 2007. Expanding the Use of Administrative Records: Methods, Applications, and Challenges. Overview. Overview and History Key technical breakthroughs Decennial and Survey Applications Medicaid Undercount Study
E N D
Sally Obenski and Jim Farber U.S. Census Bureau CNSTAT Panel January 26, 2007 Expanding the Use of Administrative Records: Methods, Applications, and Challenges
Overview • Overview and History • Key technical breakthroughs • Decennial and Survey Applications • Medicaid Undercount Study • Value of Integrated Data Sets • Operational and Technical Constraints • Policy Challenges • Conclusions
Mandate for Administrative Records Use • Title 13, Section 6: • Use administrative records information as extensively as possible in lieu of conducting direct inquires • Census Bureau Strategic Plan: • Reduce reporting burden and minimize cost to taxpayer by acquiring and developing high-quality data from sources maintained by other government and commercial entities
Title 13, U.S.C., Section 6, 9, and 214 Title 26, U.S.C., Section 6103(j) Privacy Act of 1974 Paperwork Reduction Act Government Information Security Reform Act (GISRA) E-Government Act of 2002, including Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) Legal Guidance and Protections
Safeguarding Administrative Records • Consistent Application of Policies • To ensure that projects have the appropriate legal authorization, comply with existing data agreements, and provide adequate controls to protect confidentiality and privacy • Administrative Controls • Numerous levels of approval • Need-to-know access • Removal of identifiable information • Administrative Records Tracking System • Security and confidentiality training
AR Program Evolution Infrastructure investments allow new interagency collaborations Projects included AREX 2000 and the 1999 StARS prototype Survey launched to gather info on potential AR files Race Model Addresses Quality Concerns Program begins AR Research staff created 1996 July 1993 1999/2000 2002 2005 Early 1990s 1999 2001 2004 mid 1990s July 1993 Today AR Test for 2000 Census Data Stewardship program begins Statistical uses of AR conference held PVS Increases Linking Capacity Centralized program emerges
StARS Provides Technical Infrastructure • Person & Address Databases consist of 7 national files: • IRS 1040 HUD TRACS IHS SSS • IRS 1099 HUD PIC Medicare
Administrative Records Experiment Validated StARS • Local test of AR census models conducted in 5 counties • Coverage issues similar to Census 2000 • Validated conformance of StARS to Census 2000 addresses & persons • Improvements to StARS continue, including move to more real-time redesign (E-StARS)
NUMIDENT Provides National Reference File • Social Security Administration (SSA) Numerical Identification (Numident) Transaction file with 803 million records • Collapse to 431 million unique SSN records • Usages: • Look-up file that provides demographic data • Social Security Numbers (SSNs) verification/ validation
Race and Hispanic Origin Model Rectified Quality Concerns • Initial weakness was dependence on race data from SSA’s SSN transaction file • Census 2000 records matched to SSN transaction file • Model completed missing linkages
Person Validation System (PVS) Increases Linking Capacity • Use master file of SSN/name/DOB as reference file • Link addresses with SSN reference file • Match incoming census or survey record using name, address, DOB • Search within address first (high quality match) • Search by name/DOB nationally if address search not successful • Replaces SSN with unique identifier (PIK)
Numident Incoming Data Person Validation System (PVS) Increases Linking Capacity • Prepare Numident • Prepare Incoming Data • Run Verification Phase • Run Geokey Search • Run Name Search • Apply PIKs Verification Geokey Search Name Search Final
Implementing the ACS Provides Current Long Form Data • Designed to ameliorate constraints of decennial long form data collection • Provides means for timely analyses and estimates at small geographic areas • Provides means to push models based on less granular surveys to smaller geographies
AR Integral to Census Bureau Programs • Internal Revenue Service (IRS) 1040 • Intercensal Estimates • Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates • CMS Medicare and Medicaid • National Longitudinal Mortality Study • Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates • Small Area Health Insurance Estimates • State Unemployment Insurance Files • Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics
Current Decennial Census Research • Using AR to “assign” age, race, sex, Hispanic Origin, when a record can be matched • Use AR to identify households with coverage problems • Determine if commercially available & other lists can improve & help build GQ frame
Emerging Survey Improvement (1) • Reducing ACS small area variance • Use AR as controls to adjust survey weights right after nonresponse adjustment • Preliminary research highly promising • Obtaining characteristics on nonrespondents • Compared StARS persons to CPS responders to ensure consistency • Used StARS to obtain characteristics of nonresponding households
Emerging Survey Improvement (2) • Reacting to disaster and other near-real time requirements • Katrina’s effect on the federal statistical system and our lack of current response data highlighted need • Acquired the USPS National Change of Address File and FEMA’s emergency management and flood insurance files • Developing next generation StARS – near real-time measurements
Medicaid Undercount Study (1) • Survey estimates are important to policy research • Examining the large discrepancy between survey estimates and Medicaid enrollment figures • Multi-phased, interagency study, including academia
Medicaid Undercount Study (2) • Phase I: Examines quality and characteristics of Medicaid and Medicare files (2000-2002) • Phase II: Conducts national match of Medicaid files to Current Population Survey ASEC (2001-2002) • Phase III: Conducts selected state matches of Medicaid files to states in CPS ASEC • Phase IV: Conducts national match of Medicaid files to the National Health Interview Survey and compares results
Value of Integrated Data Sets • Provides more robust and accurate picture • Builds on strengths of both views while controlling for their weaknesses • Provides better statistics for input into simulations for predictions and funds distribution • As the demand for data increases and budgets decrease data re-use many be the only cost-effective option
Operational Constraints • File Acquisition Complexities • Complex Memoranda of Understanding • State by state negotiation • Differences in content definition, quality, and program rules over time • File lag time • MSIS (Federal Medicaid) lags by about 4 years • Most lag for about a year • Many applications require more near real-time response
Illustrative Examples • Federal Files—yearly acquisitions • IRS 1040, IRS 1099, CMS Medicare, Medicaid • Federal Files—quarterly or monthly updates • SSA Numident, USPS NCOA • State Files—on as needed basis • MD Food Stamps, MD TANF, MD Child Care Subsidy • State Files—on a quarterly basis • UI Wage and ES 202 (currently from 40 states) • Commercial Files—INFOUSA
Technical Constraints • Obtaining the right data in the right format • Varying rates of validation (e.g., Medicare 99%, Medicaid 91%) • Coarseness of administrative data compared to nuances of surveys • Measuring error
Policy Challenges • Communicating the benefits vs. privacy concerns • Need for interagency teams to ensure accurate results • Interagency agreements and mission • “Ownership” of the integrated data sets • Growth of possible disclosure risks • Need for longitudinal data bases in order to find an anonomyzed person at an address at a point in time
Overcoming the Constraints • Resolving file acquisition issues may require OMB or Congressional assistance • Lag time for general demographics addressed by National Change of Address file—planning move to Enhanced StARS for more near real-time response • Standardized and centralized file acquisition • New files in address search phase and SAS-based matcher increased validation rates • Data Quality Standards team addressing measuring error in integrated data sets • Increasing inter-agency efforts for generating integrated data sets
Conclusions • New files and innovations leading to expansion of AR uses • New challenges continue to arise • Regular updating of billions of records to have a near real-time response system • Effectively acquiring state-based records • Understanding integrated data sets • At incipience of a new generation of products, services, and inter-agency opportunities
Contact Information • Sally M. Obenski • Assistant Division Chief for Administrative Records Applications • Data Integration Division • U.S. Census Bureau • Washington D.C. 20233-8100 • Email: Sally.M.Obenski@Census.Gov • Phone: (301) 763-4044 • Cell: (301) 873-7615