E N D
1. An History of Mobile Solidification in the UK Presented by Michael Grave
Mitsui Babcock Energy Ltd
And co-author
Arthur Willis
British Nuclear Group
for RWIN Meeting 19th July 2005
3. Historical Context Michael Grave
Decommissioning Contactor
1982 to 2005
NEI Waste Technologies Ltd
NEI International Research & Development
Rolls-Royce
Mitsui Babcock Energy Ltd
Mobile Solidification Service operated out of Gateshead office. Arthur Willis
Mostly owner operator
Contractor since 01/04/05
1973 to 2005
CEGB
Nuclear Electric
BNFL Magnox
British Nuclear Group
Magnox and AGR
4. Background White Paper on Radioactive Waste Management
July 1982
Created NIREX
Push for Repository Design (LLW and long lived ILW)
Need to consider upfront processes
Conditioning processes
Packaging
NEI Waste Technologies 1982
To operate a repository and lead in services
5. Technology Transfer USA experience promising
NEI Waste Technologies sought to influence CEGB
Initiated technology transfer from US shareholder
CEGB reviewed worldwide experience including
German MOWA plant
French PEC plant
NEI Waste Technologies Ltd (Chem Nuclear Systems) plant
CEGB Organisation involved
Barnwood
Berkeley Laboratories
NE Region Lab at Wythenshaw near Manchester
6. Development of Processes Study of solidification science and technology
UKAEA Winfrith
Work subsequently played an important part in the process selection for the BNFL Sellafield Cement Solidification Plant
UKAEA Windscale
UKAEA Dounreay
NEI Waste Technologies did some work for them on solidifying TBPOK, a solvent used in reprocessing
BNFL
Initially sought ideas widely for evaluation, which included NEI Waste Technologies
7. Fixed Solidification Plants A number of fixed plants have been built in UK e.g.
Using Cement
Trawsfynydd
Hinkley Point A
Dounreay
Sizewell B
Sellafield
Winfrith
Two types of cement PFA and BFS
Using thermosetting polymer
Trawsfynydd
8. Solidification Civil Nuclear Plant Some fixed plant from late 1970s
Trawsfynydd and Hinkley A
Fuel corrosion product sludges
For Sea dumping with wastes from other sites
Trawsfynydd plant built 1980 to 1983
Sea dump was abandoned
Plant using thermosetting polymer
Actively commissioned in 1985
First active campaign 65m3 in 500 shielded drums
Mothballed re-commissioned after station closure 1993
3 further campaigns > 1500 drums of IX resin
12. World Activities - Processes Important to learn from others
Solidification among others in: -
W Europe
USSR and satellites
USA
Japan
Media used
Urea Formaldehyde (abandoned in USA)
Bitumen
Resins as at Trawsfynydd and a mobile plant of EdF
Cement
Also synthetic rocks and glasses but mainly for HLW
Many other panaceas including Sodium Silicate
13. USA process Partner of NEI Waste Technologies
Cement with various additives to meet standards
PWR and BWR wastes
Lubricating Oil
Boric Acid
Filter Aids
IX Resins etc
Standard for Solidification 10CFR61 requirements: -
Compressive strength
Fire, Water and Biological tests
Leach rate etc
14. World Activities - Plant Diverse approaches
Twin screw mixers – pre mixed cement and waste outside waste drum
Fixed plant – often drum moves from station to station
Filling
Mixing
Curing
Lidding
Quality check etc
Similar approaches in mobile plant
ISO containers
Bolt to floor in which case “modular”
15. USA - Large container solidification Container is key plant item
All operations are taken to the container
Standard one-size fits all fill-head placed on top of container
2000 litre to 9000 litre size of container (or liner)
Liner fits in side range of transport flasks
References in the paper to the advantages of larger containers
Fill head can also be used on 200 litre drum
Basis of Mitsui Babcock 200 litre drum – LLW plant
16. Some issues with large containers Disposable throw away process plant can be built into the container
Paddle
De-watering equipment
Level monitoring processes (plant had 3 independent ways)
Other processes linked to fill-head
Paddle drive connection
Remote CCTV
Waste in and water out feed lines
Less handling/transport/dose for unit waste quantity
Weight and size impacts on transport/repository
17. Initial Developments: Magnox/AGR Review of 3 systems for use in UK
The USA large liner system selected for further trials
A constraint was the limited number of transport containers adopted by NIREX in UK
Limited maximum size of liner to 2600 litres
Two development issues undertaken by NEI Waste Technologies
Demonstration of concept of a mobile service
Demonstration on relevant waste streams
18. Oldbury Demonstration 200 litre demonstration plant
Gas circulator oil
Trials on oil in laboratory
Demonstrate suitability of formulation
Produce a tolerance box within which formulation was considered successful
6 drums solidified
Plant delivered from and returned to Gateshead in a week
Operated by contractor
19. Development of Formulations Undertaken by David Saul of NEI Waste Technologies
No quality standard like 10CFR61 in UK
Set of tests agreed with client
Compressive strength
Impact tests
Water immersion
An initial formulation developed for all ILW streams
Magnox and AGR
Pond Sludges
IX resins (granular and bead)
Filter Aids
Silica gel
20. A typical USA large liner plant
21. Large Container Mixing Trials Successes
Concept of solidifying in large containers
Waste quality process control was simple to understand
Paddle design and operating procedures well understood
Fill head design and plant and control systems simple and had redundancy
Full scale demonstrations on
Silica gel
Varivoid filter sand
Magnesium Hydroxide Sludge
Diatomaceous earth filter precoat
Bead Ion Exchange Resin
22. Large Container Mixing Trials Difficulties
Filter sand could not be suspended (process amended)
Magnesium Hydroxide Sludge expected to and did block filters (settling alternative but was very slow)
Multi-level redundant systems effective but too simple for UK tastes at the time
Combination of management and engineering controls also outside UK experience for nuclear plant
Some of the quality data of the mix was obtained by scientific deduction rather than direct measurement
23. Continuing developments and services The British Nuclear Group solidification development facility was set up at Chorley following a competitive tendering exercise after 1987
Mitsui Babcock (then NEI) undertook the first full LLW mobile solidification and waste disposal service on IX resins up to 12GBq/te activity in 1990
Learning curve for Drigg as well as the contractor
Other contracts followed for diverse wastes such as
IX resins
Incinerator Ash
Drain sludges etc
24. British Nuclear Group LLW Plant First mobile plant in 1990 for LLW sludges
Hartlepool PS produced 500No. 200-litre drums
Simple in drum mixing with lost paddle
A number of manual operations included meant the activity levels were limited by need to control operator dose
Continued use of the plant around various sites
Magnox
AGR
Defence etc
26. British Nuclear Group Systems (2) Plant developed for ILW
IX Resins
Sludges
Transportable Intermediate Level Waste Solidification Plant (TILWSP)
Commissioned in 2003 at Trawsfynydd
Uses 2600 litre drum (NIREX standard 3m3)
Process plant in ISO containers
Walls used for containment and shielding
Fully remote operation using a sequenced controller
Remote quality checking for hardness and free water
30. British Nuclear Group Systems (3) Plant Developed for Dewatering of Sludges
Transportable Sludge Dewatering Unit (TRSDU)
Fully mobile plant in ISO container (30 ft)
Can be used as a pre-stage to TILWSP
Has some benefits of final waste product volume by removing excess water in advance of solidification
Is used to give control of water/cement ratios
Shortly to be installed at Trawsfynydd PS
Dewater large volumes of tank wash water
31. TILWSP and TRSDU goals To be used for
ILW sludges
ILW IX resins
On the power station sites
Magnox
AGR
To be transportable between sites
Use IP2 transport packages to contain contaminated materials
Confidence based on 15 years mobile experience with LLW plant
32. Mitsui Babcock Mobile Service Has operated since 1986
Nearly 20 years experience with 4 solidification plant and a grouting plant
Has been described in poster paper at first RWIN conference and also BNES Cumbria seminar.
Service has included in part or full
Selection of formulation (library of Process Control Programmes)
Plant configuration (variable)
Obtaining of regulatory and disposal authorisations
Transport and disposal to Drigg (road, rail and sea)
Gateshead base with supporting active laboratory
33. Mitsui Babcock Plant version 2
34. Key Plant Features Variable configuration of plant
Advantages
Different waste forms
Different activity levels
Different site access conditions (often very difficult)
Minimise capital investment in plant
Keep as simple as possible
Choice of fully manual or semi-remote operation
Pump internal can be thrown away if necessary
Fill head is very small and easily transported
These are the only two contaminated items
35. Mitsui Babcock Plant version 3
36. Mitsui Babcock Grouting Plant
37. Future Developments Mitsui Babcock Energy Ltd inherited the business of Rolls-Royce Nuclear Engineering Services in 2002
Internally funded development from 2003
Up grade plant to modern standards
Incorporate lessons learned by operating team from solidifying over a thousand drums of waste - nearly 10 different waste types
Improve waste loading efficiency as delivered to Drigg
Adapt to handle some ILW types
Focus on fit for purpose design
low capital cost,
simple operation
Waste Disposal Authority needs
Focus on service and not plant
38. The Future Advent of NDA leading to contractor services
Wide range of operational waste backlogs remain
Additional decommissioning wastes arising
One size will not fit all and flexibility in waste processing needs will be required
Highly complex nuclear solutions are not the answer for lower activity wastes
NDA will look for value for money
Mobile plants avoid the need for capital investment including new buildings
British Nuclear Group and Mitsui Babcock Energy Ltd have responded with mobile plant developments
39. Not a conclusion - A Post Script!
40. Acknowledgements