1 / 17

POSC WITSML™ SIG Overview

POSC WITSML™ SIG Overview. John Turvill, Paradigm November 2005 POSC AGM. Agenda. Vision Organization, Process Current and Future Activities Growth and Benefits Learnings. The Original Vision. Automation of many manual processes in current Drilling Data workflows

chi
Download Presentation

POSC WITSML™ SIG Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. POSC WITSML™ SIG Overview John Turvill, Paradigm November 2005POSC AGM

  2. Agenda • Vision • Organization, Process • Current and Future Activities • Growth and Benefits • Learnings

  3. The Original Vision • Automation of many manual processes in current Drilling Data workflows • Contractors (Service and Drilling) automatically push data into corporate data stores • Partners can automatically pull data (Not images) for morning reports into their data stores • Operators can push statutory reporting data for reports to regulators • Contractors can share data with one another at the rigsite • A single standard to make the vision possible, reducing industry costs Based on BP slide, June ‘04

  4. WITSML™ – WWW.WITSML.ORG Wellsite Information Transfer Standard Markup Language “The ‘right-time’ seamless flow of well-site data between operators and service companies to speed and enhance decision-making” A New Open Information Transfer Standard for the Oilfield

  5. Process SIG participants may be POSC Members or non-members POSCBoard of Directors Management & Staff Membership SIGs are standardsuser communities WITSML SIGParticipants Integrated Ops SIG Well Log SIG Other SIGs POSC energy eStandards:WITSML, PWLS, Epicentre, etc.

  6. SIG Teams Plan and review SIG activities; coordinate semi-annual meetings,seminars, exhibitions; discuss andagree on future plans SteeringCommittee TechnicalTeams Use Case &RequirementsTeam ImplementationSupport Team Recognize and agreeon detailed requirements;correct and improve;first-line reviewers Identify and agree onareas of expansion;organize study and requirements sub-teams Share experiences usingWITSML-enabled products;facilitate user dialogue;recommend improvement

  7. Document References • WITSML Standards • Specifications (data, interfaces) • Sample data • Startup toolkit • WITSML Community • Records of past events: presentations, notes, agendas • SIG Contact information • Test Server availability information • Mailing lists and Discussion Forums • Issue tracking; draft specifications for review • Web Sites • www.witsml.org and www.posc.org

  8. The Drilling Environment Drilling Data Providers Rig Instrumentation • Surface Logging Fluids Systems Coring Surveying Directional Drilling Systems Logging While Drilling Source: BakerHughes/Paradigm

  9. Data Objects • General • Well • Message • Operations Report • Real Time • Wellbore • Wellbore Geometry • Risk • Communication • Subscription • Server Capabilities • Rig Instrumentation • Rig / Rig Equipment • Cement Job • Surface Logging • Mud Log • Fluids Systems • Fluids Report • Coring • Sidewall Core • Conventional Core • Surveying • Survey Program • Target • Trajectory • Directional Drilling Systems • Tubular / • Bit Record • Open Hole • BHA Run • Logging While Drilling • Log  Well Log (includes Wireline) • Formation Marker • Existing • Updated • New Source: BakerHughes/Paradigm

  10. CURRENT RELEASES Version 1.3 Released in March 2005 Version 1.3.1 Pre-release Public Review closes next week FUTURE PLANS Version 1.3.x Clarifications (published as identified) Further planning to take place at Nov. 15-16 SIG Meetings EXPANSION AND INTEGRATION WITSML’s technical architecture and characteristics being adopted for existing and new POSC data transfer standards WellPathML  well, wellbore, trajectory and trajectoryStation,WellLogML  wellLog, WellSchematicML  completion, ProductionML  production reporting What’s Happening and What’s Next?

  11. Austin Stavanger Aberdeen Houston Calgary Paris Houston Stavanger Timeline: Participation, Seminars, Releases V1.0 V1.1 V1.2,POSCcustody V1.3 V1.3.1 Enhancements:Well Path, Mudlog,Wireline, etc.

  12. Benefits • Active and visible WITSML community • Shared funding of WITSML custody, support, and promotional activities • Active outreach to align WITSML with other initiatives • Within POSC, the expansion of WITSML architecture across all technical E&P data transfer standards: Integrated Operations (Production), Well Log (Wireline), Regulatory, Laboratory, Reference, etc. • Within the industry with other industry groups: UKOOA and US MMS (well path), PPDM (use of POSC exchange and reference standards), Government agencies (regulatory), XML and SOA (OASIS, W3C, OpenGIS, OpenGroup), etc. • Vendor neutral promotion of WITSML use and maintenance of WITSML specifications and materials

  13. Why has the WITSML initiative been successful?Some lessons learned / best practices The Right Initial Players - clear focus BP & Statoil with Baker, Halliburton, Schlumberger, and NPSi Strong Commitment Initial funding by oil companies; Oil & service companies remain engaged after initial delivery Effective Processes Practical, incremental approach Clear focus on target outcomes - through implementation Frequent communications - steering & technical teams Choice of Technologies XML, SOAP Comprehensive Output and Documentation XML Schemas + Server API + sample implementation Openness / Evolution Public seminars and presentations Transfer to POSC in early ’03 -- commercially neutral custody, publication, promotion and evolution

  14. What we must do in the future? • Maintain enthusiasm for the vision • Continue to involve interested and committed, knowledgeable people • Address use cases that add real (quantifiable to management) value • Keep the spirit of trust and cooperation between competitors • Have oil companies supply chain management provide contractual re-enforcement • Increase cooperation among different domains to minimize duplication working with similar types of data and to maximize re-use of work already done • Continue to work with other organizations, such as PPDM, to maximize alignment of data exchange specifications as well as vocabularies and reference data Based on BP slide, June ‘04

  15. WITSML SIG Steering Committee Co-Chairs:Jake Booth, ExxonMobil and Peter Nielsen, StatoilJohn Turvill, Paradigm and John Shields, BakerHughesWITSML SIG Use Case & Requirements Team Chair:Matthew Kirkman, BPWITSML SIG Implementation Support Team Chairs:Lars Olav Grovik, HydroDavid Johnson, Landmark/HalliburtonWITSML SIG Technical Teams Chair:John Shields, BakerHughesPOSC’s WITSML SIG Coordination:Alan Doniger and Gary Masters

  16. Nov 15-18 Meetings • Technical Teams • Address V1.3.1 feedback and make future plans • Use Case and Requirements Team • Address potential future areas of focus: drilling reports, environmental, well services, well stimulation, service rig reporting. • Implementation Support Team • Address implementation and usage lessons learned and current issues and challenges. • Public Seminar • Current reports from actual experiences and plans from oil companies, service companies, and software companies. • Service and software vendor exhibits

More Related