130 likes | 218 Views
Computing Confidence Intervals for Predicting New Observations in the Linear Mixed Model. Lloyd J. Edwards Kunthel By Department of Biostatistics, UNC-CH A. Jackson Stenner Gary L. Williamson Robert F. (Robin) Baker MetaMetrics, Inc. Outline. Introduction Basic Work with Growth Curves
E N D
Computing Confidence Intervals for Predicting New Observations in the Linear Mixed Model Lloyd J. Edwards Kunthel By Department of Biostatistics, UNC-CH A. Jackson Stenner Gary L. Williamson Robert F. (Robin) Baker MetaMetrics, Inc. SAMSI Longitudinal Working Group
Outline • Introduction • Basic Work with Growth Curves • Prediction Error in the Mixed Linear Model • New Software SAMSI Longitudinal Working Group
Introduction • MetaMetrics’ perspective • Unification of measurement • Characterization of measurement error • Life-span developmental approach • Fitting models to data vs. fitting data to models • Longitudinal Working Group • Mutual interests (growth, mixed models, etc.) • Collaboration (theoretical, practical interests) • Summer GRA (production of new software) SAMSI Longitudinal Working Group
Growth Curve Basics • Growth Model • Multilevel formulation • Mixed Model • Data Sets • NC • Palm Beach • Example SAMSI Longitudinal Working Group
Growth Model Multilevel formulation Level 1: Lti = 0i + 1iTIMEti + eti Level 2: 0i = 00 + r0i 1i = 10 + r1i Mixed model formulation Lti = 00 + 10TIMEti + r0i + r1iTIMEti + eti SAMSI Longitudinal Working Group
Prediction Scenarios forTwo-Level Models Prediction and prediction intervals for: • all observations in the data set • one student in the data set, on future measurement occasions (given yi, Xi, Zi) • a new student who is not in the data set SAMSI Longitudinal Working Group
General Mixed ModelFormulation Prediction Limits of the form: SAMSI Longitudinal Working Group
Characterizing prediction error • Distinctions • Simple linear case versus • Mixed Model analog versus SAMSI Longitudinal Working Group
Characterizing prediction error • Benefits • obtain best predicted status • state confidence limits for prediction • reduce apparent measurement error • consistent with a parametric form SAMSI Longitudinal Working Group
New Software • SAS IML • Current features • Three prediction scenarios • Simple assumptions for error covariances • Restricted to two-level MLMs • Limited ability to incorporate covariates • Available at: http://www.unc.edu/~kby/ SAMSI Longitudinal Working Group
Further Research • Assumption of i.i.d. within-subject errors • Literature suggests more complex error covariance structures. • Chi and Reinsel (1989, JASA) extend to AR(1) errors • We extend to general within-subject error covariance structure. SAMSI Longitudinal Working Group
Closing Third Lexile National Reading Conference June 19-21, 2006 Developing Tomorrow’s Readers...Today http://www.Lexile.com SAMSI Longitudinal Working Group