50 likes | 321 Views
Prior Art. What is prior art? Prior art = certain types of knowledge defined by 102(a)-(g) that may operate to defeat patentability or invalidate a patent To be relevant, art must fall within 102 102 prior art, however, does not necessarily have to anticipate any claim. Novelty Requirements.
E N D
Prior Art • What is prior art? • Prior art = certain types of knowledge defined by 102(a)-(g) that may operate to defeat patentability or invalidate a patent • To be relevant, art must fall within 102 • 102 prior art, however, does not necessarily have to anticipate any claim
Novelty Requirements • Certain activities before DOI constitute prior art • DOI = conception + diligence to RTP • Conception: definite and permanent idea of entire invention • Diligence: must be continuous and begin prior to conception by other and extend to his RTP • RTP • Constructive • Filing date of completed application • Actual • Invention worked for intended purpose • If any of these activities occur before DOI, then invention may not be novel and not entitled to patent (or patent may be invalid)
Activities Before DOI That Constitute Prior Art • 102(a) – public prior art (first-to-invent rule) • Known or used by others in US • Patented anywhere • Printed publication anywhere • 102(e)-(g) – secret prior art • 102(e): earlier( than DOI) application published or issues • 102(f): derived from true inventor • 102(g)(2) • Applies only to invention made in US • First to RTP entitled to patent unless . . .
Statutory Bars • Certain activities constitute statutory bars • 102(b), (c), (d) • 102(b): activities before critical date (> 1 year before filing date of application) • 102(c): abandonment • 102(d): delay • What happens to a patent where the inventor conceived > 1 year before filing and there was a public use of anticipating art after inventor’s conception but more than a year before inventor filed?
Corroboration • For establishing that art is prior art • Corroboration of oral evidence of prior invention is the general rule • RTI case is example of role corroboration can play • For establishing inventor’s date of conception • Inventor’s testimony standing alone is insufficient to prove conception • For establishing co-inventorship • Corroborating evidence is required of any asserted contributions to conception of the invention • For establishing diligence • Corroboration needed • For establishing actual reduction to practice • Corroboration needed