540 likes | 766 Views
Outline. Detection of Outbreaks local vs. state detection Investigation of Outbreaks- roles in CAsingle event/single location vs. widespreadOutbreak control and preventionlocal control vs. statewide/national preventionMajor Etiologic AgentsTrends in Foodborne OutbreaksInvestigation Steps and
E N D
1. Foodborne Outbreaks in California: Detection, Etiology, Recent Trends, Investigation Janet Mohle-Boetani, MD, MPH
Chief, Infectious Diseases Branch
California Dept. of Health Services
2. Outline Detection of Outbreaks
local vs. state detection
Investigation of Outbreaks- roles in CA
single event/single location vs. widespread
Outbreak control and prevention
local control vs. statewide/national prevention
Major Etiologic Agents
Trends in Foodborne Outbreaks
Investigation Steps and Homework
3. Detection of Outbreaks by LHDs Telephone call by resident/institution/physician about cluster of persons with similar symptoms
vomiting among persons who had been at a common event (eg, party) or location (eg,restaurant/camp)
review of logs of individual complaints: common location detected (works with short incubation)
Routine interviews by local HD with patients diagnosed with bacterial infections (eg, Salmonella, E. coli O157 or Shigella) reveals an eating event/location in common
4. Detection by LHD (cont.) Residential facilities
health care facilities (hospitals and skilled nursing facilities) report to both local HD and L&C
department of social services facilites (retirement communities, assisted living center, group homes) report to LHD
prisons and jails report to local HD
State notifies local HD about a cluster of patients with the same unusual strain of Salmonella or E. coli O157
5. Detection of Outbreaks by CDHS Lab Detection
Microbial Diseases Laboratory notifies Infectious Diseases Branch (IDB) in DHS about a cluster of cases of infection with an unusual strain of bacteria (eg, E. coli O157 or Salmonella) detected through serotyping or DNA fingerprinting (resource issue)
FoodNet/PulseNet (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) notifies IDB about California cases linked to those in other states by DNA fingerprinting of isolates
6. Roles: Local Health Agencies Communicable Disease Control unit usually in the Health Department
Environmental Health unit MAY be in the Health Department or may be in a separate department
Local Public Health Laboratory- usually in the Health Department
7. Roles: Local Outbreaks Epidemiologic: to determine etiologic agent, food vehicle, and if foodhandlers are infected
Interviews with cases: symptoms/incubation period
Case-control or cohort study among attendees of an event or patrons of a restaurant
Interviews with foodhandlers re: illness
Environmental: to determine important contributing factors and obtain specimens
General inspection
Specific investigation Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point evaluation on food vehicle implicated in epidemiologic study
Collect food or environmental specimens
Laboratory
Human, food, and environmental specimens
8. Roles: State/Federal Agencies California Department of Health Services
Infectious Diseases branch (IDB), Microbial Diseases Laboratory (MDL), and Viral and Rickettsial Diseases Laboratory (VRDL) in the Division of Communicable Disease Control
Food and Drug branch (FDB) in the Division of Food, Drug and Radiation Safety
California Department of Food and Agriculture
Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
US Department of Agriculture (USDA)
9. Roles: Widespread Outbreaks Epidemiology: LHD collects descriptive information (morbidity/mortality), IDB in CDHS conducts case-control study to determine food vehicle.
Food and Drug Branch (FDB) in CDHS/FDA conducts traceback and environmental investigation if eggs, produce or commercial products. Environmental investigation on egg ranches NOT in CEQUAP
California Dept of Food and Agriculture/USDA conducts traceback and environmental investigation if dairy or meat. Environmental investigation on egg ranches in CA Egg Quality Assurance Program
CDHS/CDFA work with industry to prevent future outbreaks (eg, interventions with sprout growers and egg ranches)
10. Major types of Foodborne Outbreaks
11. Common Causes of Foodborne Outbreaks
12. Staphylococcal Foodpoisoning Heat stable toxin from S. Aureus
Infected workers (skin, eye, nose)- boils, sinus infections, even common cold
Food- good growth medium and held at improper temperature for hours
Prevent- exclude workers with purulent discharges, colds, and cover skin lesions
13. Clostridium perfringens Foodpoisoning Incubation 12 hours, short duration diarrhea, rarely need MD
CP is ubiquitous in soil and GI tract of man and animals
Not usually lab confirmed- new PCR test
Food- storage of meats/stews in huge quantity at room temp or slow cooling, insufficient reheating
Prevent- eat after initial cooking or cool rapidly, serve cold or rewarm to 165 ASAP
14. Salmonella Zoonotic infection, >2000 serotypes
Diarrhea, fever, 12 hr- 7 day incubation, prolonged symptoms (several days), often seek medical help
Foodborne transmission- infected/contaminated raw meat or food contaminated in field/distribution chain
foodhandler transmission is rare
Traditionally meat/poutry but now many outbreaks due to raw produce
Prevention- cook food well, wash produce?, decrease contamination: on farm? in distribution chain? in meat processors? in fresh cut product plants?
15. Norovirus Infections Symptoms: vomiting, diarrhea, fever, myalgia
Incubation period: 36 hours (24-48 hrs)
Symptom duration: 1-2 days
Definition of “Suspected Norovirus Outbreak”
>50% vomiting
Incubation close to 36 hours
No bacterial pathogens found
Secondary transmission
Human pathogen solely: no zoonotic spread-THINK ILL FOODHANDLER
Prevention- exclude foodhandlers with vomiting or diarrhea
16. Other Important Foodborne Illnesses Botulism (C. botulinum)-
cranial nerve palsies- droopy eyelids, double/blurry vision
Improperly canned food, also refrigerated pre-cooked foods not reheated (clam chower)
Bacillus cereus poisoning- like SA (heat stable toxin) or CP (heat labile toxin)
Scombroid fish poisoning-
Spoiled fish in the tuna family
“Allergic” symptoms: flushed skin, hives, itching, rash, facial swelling
17. Foodborne Disease Outbreaks in California: Recent Trends in Etiologic Agents
18. Definitions Foodborne Disease Outbreak: 2 or more cases of a similar illness resulting from the ingestion of a common food.
Confirmed: CDC definitions (> 2 lab cases but only 1 for C. bot and norovirus until 2004)
Suspected: based on symptoms, incubation period, duration (e.g., norovirus)
19. Data Form 52.13 “Investigation of a Foodborne Outbreak”
LHDs fill out and send to State
State fills out (e.g., if multicounty outbreak)
Review
Confirmed etiologic agent?
Suspected etiologic agent?
Confirmed food vehicle?
Ill foodhandler?
20. Foodborne Outbreaks by Yearand Confirmation Status
21. Confirmed Etiologic Agents
22. Confirmed Etiologic Agent Category by Year
23. Confirmed Agents Causing Foodborne Outbreaks, California
24. Confirmed Etiologic Agent Category by Year
25. Norovirus Outbreaks by Yearand Confirmation Status
26. Foodborne Disease Outbreaks: Trends in Food Vehicles, California
27. Definitions Confirmed food vehicle:
Isolation of agent from a food
Epi investigation with a stat sig association
Categories of food vehicles:
Produce, meat/poultry, dairy, egg, seafood
Multiple, other
28. Food Vehicle by Year of OutbreakCalifornia
29. Proportion of Outbreaks by Food Vehicle and 5- Year Period
30. Notable outbreaks S. Thompson and cilantro
S. Enteritidis and mung bean sprouts
S. Enteritidis and almonds
S. Poona and imported cantaloupes
S. Typhimurium and Mexican style cheese
E. coli O157 and ground beef tacos
E. coli O157 and prepacked/washed lettuce/spinach
31. Summary Local Health Departments usually identify and investigate single event/location foodborne outbreaks
State usually identifies and investigates widespread/multicounty foodborne outbreaaks
Increased detection of outbreaks due to Norovirus; most of these are due to infected foodhandlers
Increased detection of outbreaks due to produce
32. Outbreak Investigations
33. Steps 1 and 2: Outbreak Exists and Confirmation 1)Existence of an outbreak
Example- Salmonella Saphra outbreak
Example- vomiting and diarrhea among patrons of a restaurant about 36 hours after eating
Event vs. non-event
2A)Determine Likely agent/ Confirm Dx
Symptoms, incubation period, transmission
Standard lab techniques: culture, serology
DNA fingerprinting for common serotypes (eg, SE)
34. Step 3: Define and Count Cases 3A)Define cases: practical, reliable, apply without bias
Example: E. coli O157 at Restaurant X
Confirmed: culture positive with same PFGE pattern and ate at restaurant X during Y time frame
Probable: bloody diarrhea and ate at restaurant X during Y time frame
Possible: diarrhea (3 loose stools per day) and ate at restaurant X during Y time frame
35. Step 3: Continued Case Definition may need to be updated within an investigation
Broad to specific
Infection with E. coli O157 vs. infection with the outbreak strain (defined by PFGE pattern)
Setting may change
Restaurant associated outbreak may broaden to sporadic cases based on laboratory analysis
36. Step 3: Continued 3B) Count Cases
Case Finding: encourage testing
Stools for norovirus can be collected up to 1 week after onset
Collect:
Demographics (age, sex, race, residence, occupation)
Symptoms and date of onset
Laboratory data
Isolates for further testing (eg, DNA fingerprinting)
37. Step 4: Orient the Data 4A)Orient data by time (epi curve: # cases [Y axis] vs. onset date[X axis])
Point source outbreak: mean onset date minus incubation period= exposure date
Example: textbook
Ongoing transmission
Example: shigellosis in Lexington
Control of outbreak
Example: Salmonella outbreak
39. Step 4: Orient the Data 4A)Orient data by time (epi curve: # cases [Y axis] vs. onset date[X axis])
Point source outbreak: mean onset date minus incubation period= exposure date
Example: textbook
Ongoing transmission
Example: shigellosis in Lexington
Control of outbreak
Example: Salmonella outbreak
41. Step 4: Orient the Data 4A)Orient data by time (epi curve: # cases [Y axis] vs. onset date[X axis])
Point source outbreak: mean onset date minus incubation period= exposure date
Example: textbook
Ongoing transmission
Example: shigellosis in Lexington
Control of outbreak
Example: Salmonella outbreak
42. S. Senftenberg Outbreak, 1997-1998
43. Step 4: Orient the Data 4B)Orient data by place: location in city, hospital, prison
Example: TB in a prison
Example: E. coli O157 and sprouts
45. Step 4: Orient the Data 4C)Orient data by person:
age-group
Example: Salmonella and marijuana
Sex
Example: Salmonella and alfalfa sprouts
Ethnicity
Example: Salmonella and cheese
46. Step 5: Determine who is at risk 5)Determine who is at risk:
Example: Salmonella and Obon Festival
Example: E. coli O157 and restaurant chain and schools (same produce supplier)
5B) “Outliers” may provide key information
Example: E. coli O157 and school lunch
Example: E. coli O157 in residents outside of SLO traveled to SLO
47. Step 6: Hypothesis Generation 6A)Generate Hypotheses
Indepth interviews:
Example: foodborne outbreak in restaurant: use menu, hypothesis generation with 5-10 patients: garnishes (not on menu) or
Example: foodborne outbreak multicounty: >70 food item questionnaire and open-ended
Usually generates an outbreak specific profile
Examples: deli restaurants, Mexican restaurants, spring break in NY/Chicago/Europe
48. Epidemiologic Investigation Goal 1: Identify a specific food item associated with disease
Goal 2: Prevent future disease
recall contaminated product
determine how the product was contaminated and develop guidelines to prevent contamination in the future
49. Homework Exercise
50. Food-borne Outbreak Investigation Steps- I
51. Food-borne Outbreak Investigation Steps- II
52. Food-borne Outbreak Investigation Steps- III
53. Food-borne Outbreak Investigation Steps- IV
54. Format for Reporting: Cohort Study
55. Format for Reporting: Case-Control Study