140 likes | 273 Views
Product Stewardship and the Precautionary Principle. SF Department of the Environment. SFE Overview. Product Stewardship. San Francisco has been very active over the past 20 +years Many different local initiatives that have resulted in effective programs throughout San Francisco
E N D
Product Stewardship and the PrecautionaryPrinciple SF Department of the Environment
SFE Overview • .
Product Stewardship • San Francisco has been very active over the past 20 +years • Many different local initiatives that have resulted in effective programs throughout San Francisco • San Francisco has also been active statewide and nationally advocating for extended producer responsibility policies
History Long SF history of promoting toxics reduction and proper HHW handling - first HHWF in CA Learned from British Columbia and Northwest Product Stewardship Council formation Worked with Product Stewardship Institute Advocated locally on individual campaigns Joined effort to create California Product Stewardship Council, it has been a great step “Adopt” neighboring jurisdictions
Examples Paint take-back in place for over 20 years 100 retail locations taking batteries 35 taking CFLs 70 needles drop-off locations Effective mercury thermometer exchanges Most are small retail, hardware and pharmacy type stores where space is at a premium Shows the big box stores and manufacturers that it can be done, and that residents use it No excuse if “Mom and Pop” in SF can do it with no space, displaces other products, on their own staff time As locations increase HHWF stays constant, no drop
The Precautionary Approach It is NOT sufficient to ask: Is it legal? Is it safe? We also MUST ask: Is it necessary?
How long do we wait, how much harm do we allow,before taking action?
The Precautionary Principle ≠Zero risk ≠Zero science ≠Loss of jobs ≠ Predetermined outcome (i.e. ban) =Minimize harm =Maximize info./science =Increase innovation = Transparent Process for public decision making
So that when we ask: • It is legal? • Confident our laws are protective of all life • Is it safe? • Sufficient data and testing so that we understand how a chemical interacts within organisms and ecosystems • Is it necessary? • Affected communities are at the table, we are all empowered to examine all the alternatives, and to choose those that minimize harm
= Adopted in 2006 =Incorporated as part of the Environmental Code in SF The Precautionary Principle
Other examples of, “Is is necessary?” • Plastic bags • Water bottles • Artificial Turf • Energy efficient lighting that contains mercury
Contact: Marjaneh Zarrehparvar 415-355-3756 marjaneh.zarrehparvar@sfgov.org Debbie Raphael 415-355-3711 debbie.raphael@sfgov.org