1 / 16

The welfare state and middle class political dominance

The welfare state and middle class political dominance. The Finnish Academy of Science and Letters Centennial Celebration Seminar in Social Sciences Helsinki Jan 28, 2008 Professor Bo Rothstein University of Gothenburg. Some basic facts. Nordic countries (ex. Norway) US

chip
Download Presentation

The welfare state and middle class political dominance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The welfare stateand middle class political dominance The Finnish Academy of Science and Letters Centennial Celebration Seminar in Social Sciences Helsinki Jan 28, 2008 Professor Bo Rothstein University of Gothenburg

  2. Some basic facts • Nordic countries (ex. Norway) US • Growth: 3,1% 3,2% • WEF rank: 3,4, & 6 1 • GDP/Cap: 33000 41000 • Public exp: 48% 27% • Inf. Mort: 3,5% 7% • Life exp: 79 77 • Hours worked: 1600 1800 • In poverty all: 5% 17% • Poverty child: 3,5% 22% • Social Trust: 59% 33% • In prison: 72 /100000 725 /100000

  3. Income and Life Satisfaction

  4. Economic Growth and Equality • No correlation between levels of public spending and economic growth • There is no “trickle down” effect • Lindert: Public spending on investments in “human capital” increases growth • Social policies may increase flexibility on labor markets • Policies for equality increases social trust that may increase economic growth

  5. Measuring country performance • Human Development (UNDP) • Economic competitiveness (WEF) • GDP/capita (World Bank) • Democracy (The Economist) • Globalization (The Swiss Economic Institute) • Political Freedom (Freedom House) • Gender Equality (WES) • Corruption (Transparency International) • Environmental Protection (Yale, WEF) • Doing Business (World Bank) • Knowledge Economy (World Bank) • Good Society Index (Quality of Government Institue, Gothenburg)

  6. Meta Index • 1. Sweden • 2. Denmark • 3. Iceland • 4. Norway • 5. Finland • 6. Switzerland • 7. Canada

  7. Conclusions • Government spending can reduce inequality • Equality does not harm growth • Equality “from below” is more important than equality “from above”

  8. The Linguistic Problem • Welfare State or • Social Insurance State or • Social Service State or • Social Protection State or

  9. Gustav Möller’s 1948 discovery • Contrary to the predictions of the Marxist theory, the industrial proletariat did not grow larger • The white-collars strata had started to grow faster than the traditional working class • The while-collars strata would start to play a key-role in the elections • If the Social Democrats would continue in power, the party had to create new policies that would appeal to the white-collar segment without alienating the traditional blue-collar working class voters • A strategic dilemma

  10. The solution: A conceptual innovation • From workers to wage-earners • From ”middle-class” to wage-earners • From working class (or middle-class) politics to wage-earners’ politics • To unite people without property • Support of a strong and well-organized white-collar union movement

  11. Four policy solutions • 1. Universal social services and benefits • 2. Income-related social insurance system • 3. A strong emphasis on eduction • 4. Gender equality policies • MÖLLER’S STRATEGY: CREATING SOLIDARITY BY POLICIES FROM ABOVE

  12. How does the system works? .

  13. The efficiency argument • Could the market do it? • Would privatization be more efficient? • Would the middle class be better of with lower taxes that would make it possible to by private insurances? • The theory about ”assymetric information says” – probably not.

  14. ”Information failures provide both a theoretical justification of and an explanation for a welfare state which is much more than a safety net. Such a welfare state is justified not simply by redistributive aims one may (or may not) have, but because it does things which markets for technical reasons would either do inefficiently, or would not do at all” ”Both theory and the performance of systems in practice overwhelmingly support the view that a hypothetical pure private market for medical care and medical insurance would be highly inefficient and also inequitable” Nicholas Barr: Economic theory and the welfare state”

  15. Conclusions • The Nordic welfare state is very much program that serves the middle-class (wage earners more than small business) • This was, at least in Sweden, a very deliberate political strategy • Non-socialist (centre-right) governments seem to be locked-in into this system • However, the system works pretty well, • so far

  16. Questions Comments Critique Thanks for listening!

More Related