320 likes | 631 Views
Competing for Resources. Speaker: Yu-ju Chen 2009/10/2. Contents. The ideal free distribution Resource defence: 1.The despotic distribution 2.Unequal competitors 3.The economics of resource defence 4.Shared resource defence 5.Interspecific territoriality Discussion.
E N D
Competing for Resources Speaker: Yu-ju Chen 2009/10/2
Contents • The ideal freedistribution • Resource defence: 1.The despotic distribution 2.Unequal competitors 3.The economics of resource defence 4.Shared resource defence 5.Interspecific territoriality • Discussion
Rich habitat Poor habitat The ideal freedistribution(Fretwell,1972) Fig. 5.1 At point “a”, the poor habitat will be equally attractive. e.g “Supermarket” Rewards per individual a Number of competitors
Example of the sticklebacks(Milinski,1979) Fig. 5.2 The point x to the point y End B of the tank had twice the amount of as end A.
Example of the sticklebacks Competitor numbers adjusting All individuals visiting both habitats
Number gaining access to resource Rich habitat Poor habitat a b Number of competitors The despotic distribution(Brown,1969) Fig. 5.3 The point a and the point b habitat become full
Competitive unit With unequal competitor If one individual can consume resources twice as rapidly as another it score twice the number of competitive unit.
90 225 20 The difficulty Fig. 5.4 (c) has the same numerical pattern as (e).
Example of the aphids(Whitham,1980) Fig. 5.5 Number of stem mother per leaf
Example of the aphids Larger leaves correspond to better habitats Three conclusions: 1.The average reproductive success increases with habitat quality. 2.Within a habitat of certain quality, reproductive success decreases as the number of competitors increases. 3.”Alone on a leaf” or “share”?
Economic defendability(Brown,1964) The defence of a resource has costs as well as the benefits of priority.
The golden-winged sunbird(Gill & Wolf,1964) The nectar level from 2μl to 3μl: 1.(1000x1.3)froaging – (400x1.3)resting =780cal(save) 2.(3000x0.28) defence – (400x0.28) no resting=728cal(cost) 780cal-728cal=52cal>0
Optimal territory size(Carpenter et al,1983) Fig. 5.7 A rufous hummingbird’s weight change
Example of the wagtails(Davies & Houston,1981) Fig. 5.9 Solid dots shared territories; open dots not shared Asymptotic level of food Renewal rate of food http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Motacilla_alba_alba_cropped.JPG
Chaffinches v.s great tits(Reed,1981) • Playback experiment • Removal experiment Chaffinch Great tit http://www.advrider.com/forums/showthread.php?t=496004 http://www.pbase.com/u14/tirc/upload/41790348.IMG_0016.jpg
Discussion • Do animal ever defend more resources than they need? • How can the effects of predation differences between patches be incorporate into the ideal free distribution? • How would you apply the idea of economic defendability to resources other than food?
The End Pictures from: http://books.google.com.tw/books?id=CA31asx7zq4C&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_navlinks_s#v=onepage&q=&f=false