130 likes | 151 Views
Nozzle Numerical Simulations. New approach of CFD simulations BGC Meeting 15-09-2017. Basic difference between the models. Reynolds-averaged Navier –Stokes Previous simulations. Large eddy simulation Present simulation. Boundary conditions – Paolo’s simulation.
E N D
Nozzle Numerical Simulations New approach of CFD simulations BGC Meeting 15-09-2017 Przemysław Smakulski
Basic differencebetween the models Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes Previoussimulations Large eddy simulation Presentsimulation Przemysław Smakulski
Boundaryconditions – Paolo’ssimulation p_chamber = 0.1 bar p_in =10 bar Nozzleφ30 mm Przemysław Smakulski
CFD simulation. Chamber pressure 𝑝=0.1 [𝑏𝑎𝑟] RANSmodel SteadyState LES model TransientSelectedtime: Convergencecriteria: RMS < Przemysław Smakulski
CFD simulation. Chamber pressure 𝑝=0.1 [𝑏𝑎𝑟] RANS model SteadyState ??? LES model TransientSelectedtime: Convergence criteria: RMS < Przemysław Smakulski
Theoretical Mach disc dimension – presentsimulationcomparison Przemysław Smakulski
Convergencecriteria (RMS) in model with LES RMS <10-6 Przemysław Smakulski
Forming a jet – first s Przemysław Smakulski
Statistics Przemysław Smakulski
T-s diagram for nitrogen p = 10 bar Gas N2 p = 1 mbar Isentropicexpansion Real process Gas/Liquid N2 Solid N2 Przemysław Smakulski
Temperature profile Przemysław Smakulski
De Laval micro nozzle [1] SEM image of the throat and diverging section of themicro nozzle [1]. Throatarea: 0.0625 [1] - K. Chen, M. Winter, R.F. Huang, Supersonicflow in miniaturenozzles of planarconfiguration, J. MicromechanicsMicroengineering. 15 (2005) 1736–1744. Przemysław Smakulski
Simulation of de Lavalnozzle Residiual RMS for SteadyStatecalculations Przemysław Smakulski