1 / 26

Soil Salinity Saline Soil Solution Cation Exchange and Colloidal Phenomena Mineral Weathering

Soil Salinity Saline Soil Solution Cation Exchange and Colloidal Phenomena Mineral Weathering Boron Chemistry Irrigation Water Quality. Saline Soil Solution Na + , K + , Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ CO 3 2- , SO 4 2- and Cl - dominant species

christak
Download Presentation

Soil Salinity Saline Soil Solution Cation Exchange and Colloidal Phenomena Mineral Weathering

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Soil Salinity Saline Soil Solution Cation Exchange and Colloidal Phenomena Mineral Weathering Boron Chemistry Irrigation Water Quality

  2. Saline Soil Solution Na+, K+, Ca2+ and Mg2+ CO32-, SO42- and Cl- dominant species Soils of arid regions most likely to be considered saline Defined as having an EC > 4 dS m-1 Thus, from Marion-Babcock, log I = 1.159 + 1.009 log κ I for κ = 4 dS m-1 is 0.059 molal However, many plants (crops) are sufficiently sensitive to salinity that they could not thrive, even survive at this concentration. The main problem is extraction of water from the soil. ΦT = ΦM + ΦO

  3. ΦT = ΦM + ΦO So with ΦO very -, ΦM cannot be as negative and plant extract water from soil. Permanent wilt at -15 bar, 0 osmotic decrease in ΦT

  4. Alkalinity = [HCO3-] + 2[CO32-] + [H2PO4-] + 2[HPO42-] + 3[PO43-] + [B(OH)4-] + [L-] + [OH-] – [H+] which is mostly from bicarbonate so can determine pH based on it, pH = 7.8 + log(HCO3-) – log PCO2 pH = 7.8 + log γ- + log [HCO3-] – log PCO2

  5. Cation Exchange and Colloidal Phenomena Focusing on Na+, Ca2+ and Mg2+ consider this ternary system and the three binary exchange reactions involved, 2Na+ads + Ca2+ = Ca2+ads + 2Na+VKNaCa = NCa (Na+)2 / (NNa)2(Ca2+) 2Na+ads + Mg2+ = Mg2+ads + 2Na+VKNaMg = Mg2+ads + Ca2+ = Ca2+ads + Mg2+VKMgCa = Most data on the Ca2+ / Na+ exchange, say that VKNaCa ~ 2.2 ≠ 1 Rewriting the selectivity coefficient in terms of solution phase concentrations and expressing mole fractions on the exchanger in terms of equivalent charge fractions gives, VKNaCa = Γ ([Na+]2 / [Ca2+]) x (1 - ENa2) / 4ENa2 γNa2 / γCa

  6. VKNaCa = Γ([Na+]2 / [Ca2+]) x (1 - ENa2) / 4ENa2 Recall Sodium Adsorption Ratio defined = [Na+] / ([Ca2+] + [Mg2+])1/2 with concentration units mM. Thus, if only Na+ and Ca2+ considered, SAR = 10-3/2([Na+]2 / [Ca2+])1/2 Also, Exchangeable Sodium Percentage defined = cmol(+)Na x 100 / CEC ESP = 100 ENa VKNaCa = 2.5 Γ (SAR / ESP)2 [1 – (ESP / 100)2] Also, recall significance of ESP > 15 % as defining a sodic soil if the EC < 4 dS m-1. Otherwise, if EC > 4 dS m-1, it is a saline-sodic soil.

  7. Sodic Saline and Sodic Not Affected Saline SAR = 13 ESP = 15 EC = 4

  8. VKNaCa = 2.5 Γ (SAR / ESP)2 [1 – (ESP / 100)2] For VKNaCa = 2.2 and Γ at I = 0.02 m ESP is approximately linear in SAR. Value for I is typical as is that for VKNaCa. Also, since VKMgCa ~ 1, and using the strict definition of SAR as ([Na+]2 / [Ca2+ + Mg2+])1/2, ESP ≈ kSAR

  9. If ignore complexes of Ca2+ and Mg2+, write the approximation SARP = [Na+]T / ([Ca2+]T + [Mg2+]T)1/2 Which is smaller than SAR by about 12 % due to complexes but given slope k slightly > 1 in ESP = kSAR, ESP ~ SARP Recall effect of ENa on smectite coagulation (Ca2+ and Na+ system), Generally consistent with dispersion at ESP = 15 %. Generally true and though ESP ~ SARP, onset of dispersion as set by SARP is SARP = 13.

  10. Effect of Na+ on dispersion, clogging of pores and swelling to substantially reduced hydraulic conductivity at ESP > 15 % and SAR > 13 is the basis for defining sodic soils. However, the dispersive effects occurs only when total salinity is sufficiently low, i.e., below the ccc of the colloid. Generally consistent. Increasing salinity offsets effect of Na+ on disintegration of soil structure.

  11. Effect of solution concentration on structural stability shown in Fig. 12.3. Concentration is positively related to EC. Ranges in EC-SARP show that definition of sodic and saline-sodic soils do not exactly specify whether dispersion occurs. Not sodic but possibly dispersed at low solution concentration. Sodic but possibly not dispersed due to higher solution concentration but not saline concentration.

  12. Mineral Weathering Source of Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Cl-, SO42- in arid region soils is mineral dissolution. This tends to counteract the effect that infiltration and percolation of rainwater (low EC) would have on tendency of colloids to disperse. Interestingly, high salinity increases the solubility of minerals. AaBb = aAb+ + bBa- Kso = (Ab+)a(Ba+)b = γb+a[Ab+]aγa-b[Ba-]b and since log γi = -0.512 (i)2 {I1/2 / (1 + I1/2) - 0.3I), [Ab+] and [Ba-] increase γ for monovalent at increasing I

  13. Another important aspect of dissolution in arid region soils is behavior of calcite, CaCO3. For small displacement from equilibrium, the kinetics of dissolution or precipitation can be described by, d[Ca2+] / dt = k [Kso – (Ca2+)(CO32-)] where Kso = (Ca2+)(CO32-) and k depends on pH and surface area. Recalling Ω = (Ca2+)(CO32-) / Kso, d[Ca2+] / dt = k Kso [1 – Ω] Can introduce pH effect into this expression besides that implicit in k by CaCO3 + H+ = Ca2+ + HCO3- K = 1010.3 d[Ca2+] / dt = k [Kso – (Ca2+)(HCO3-) / K (H+)]

  14. d[Ca2+] / dt = k [Kso – (Ca2+)(HCO3-) / K (H+)] Define 10-pHs = (Ca2+)(HCO3-) / K Kso to give d[Ca2+] / dt = kKso [1 – 10pH-pHs] where pH – pHs is Langelier Index So, is d[Ca2+] / dt = + / -, i.e., is dissolution / precipitation occurring based on Index value? If use data from Table 12.1 for (Ca2+), (HCO3-) and pH = 7.02, pH – pHs = 0.58 and [1 – 10pH-pHs] < 0 so calcite is precipitating. Alternatively, Ω > 1. Interestingly, this is typically the case. Equilibrium does not exist, instead the soil solution is supersaturated with respect to calcite.

  15. Why? Rate of precipitation is slowed by surface adsorption of organics. Another possibility is constant input of HCO3- (CO2) from respiration.

  16. Boron Chemistry log (H3BO3) = log K + 1/3 log (H+) – 1/6 log (Ca2+); @ pH = 7.6 and (Ca2+) = 0.0027 = 1.28 - 2.53 + 0.43 = -0.82; (H3BO3) = 0.151

  17. Value 0.151 M >> 0.000038 M (Table 12.1). Therefore, B release by dissolution must be slow and solution concentration controlled by adsorption. While H3BO3 does not dissociate, it hydrolyzes H3BO3 + H2O = B(OH)4- + H+ K = 5.8 x 10-10 But (B(OH)4-) = (H2BO3) @ pH = 9.23 and does not contribute much to (B)T Nevertheless, adsorption envelope behavior thought due to ligand exchange effectively involving loss of H+, SOH + H3BO3 = SOB(OH)2 + H2O

  18. Irrigation Water Quality Salinity, sodicity and toxicity are concerns. SensitiveTolerant Correspond to I = 0.010m I = 0.044m What is relationship between ECwater and ECsoil? Depends on leaching fraction, LF

  19. Leaching fraction, LF LF = depth of water leached below root zone / depth of applied water What is ECdrainage for set ECwater and LF? ECdrainage = ECwater / LF From ECdrainage x depth of water leached = ECwater x depth of applied water. If ECwater = 1 dS m-1 and LF = 0.15, ECdrainage = 6.7 dS m-1 However, average salinity in soil not the same as ECdrainage. Determine average ECsoil by applying this procedure stepwise to a series of soil depths down to the bottom of the root zone. This approach requires an assumption on how much soil water is used in ET in each depth segment.

  20. Assume 40% of the water in the upper ¼ depth segment meets the crop ET, 30% comes from the second ¼, 20% from the third ¼ and 10% from the bottom ¼. Determine ECdrainage at soil surface, …, and at bottom of root zone. Average these values to estimate ECsoil. For LF = 0.15 and annual ET = 1000 mm, Applied water = 1000 mm / (1 – LF) = 1176 mm Assume that at soil surface, all applied water leaches below the surface. This gives LF = 1.0. Therefore, ECdrainage1 = ECwater / LF = ECwater. If ECwater = 1.0 dS m-1, ECsoil = 1.0 dS m-1. At bottom of first ¼ depth segment, LF = 1176 mm – 0.4 (1000 mm) / 1176 mm = 0.66 ECdrainage2 = 1.0 dS m-1 / 0.66 = 1.5 dS m-1.

  21. At bottom of second depth segment, LF = [1176 mm – (0.4 + 0.3) 1000 mm] / 1176 mm = 0.40 ECdrainage3 = 1.0 dS m-1 / 0.40 = 2.5 dS m-1. Proceed the same way to get, ECsoil = (ECdrainage1 + … ECdrainage5) / 5 = 3.2 dS m-1. Thus, for a LF = 0.15, ECsoil = 3.2 x ECwater. Relationship, ECsoil = X(LF) ECwater depends on distribution of ET with depth.

  22. Using the empirical relationship, ECsoil = X(LF) ECwater and Table 12.5, for LF = 0.3, ECsoil = ECwater for LF > 0.3, ECsoil < ECwater for LF < 0.3, ECsoil > ECwater ECwater < 4 dS m-1 goes to saline soil ECwater > 4 dS m-1 does not go to saline soil

  23. @ low SARwater soil may become sodic if ECwater is low. Even at high SARwater soil may not become sodic if ECwater is sufficiently high.

  24. May also consider effect of [Ca2+] and [HCO3-] in irrigation water on tendency for CaCO3 in soil to dissolve or precipitate. Can use an adjusted SAR, adjRNa = [Na+] / [Ca2+eq + Mg2+]1/2 in VKNaCa = 2.5 Γ (SAR / ESP)2 [1 – (ESP / 100)2] to calculate ESP, however [Ca2+eq] must be calculated. Value in soil when (HCO3-) / (Ca2+) is the same as in the irrigation water and there is calcite equilibrium at the PCO2 of the soil.

  25. γ2+[Ca2+eq] = {102.5Kso / [(HCO3-)water(Ca2+)water]2}1/3 PCO21/3 Guidelines for toxicity with respect to Na, Cl and B.

More Related