1 / 16

Ohio Conference on Freight September 17-18, 2007 Mark Vonderembse Mark.Vonderembse@utoledo

University of Toledo (UT) Intermodal Transportation Institute http://research.utoledo.edu/ITI/ITI.htm Status Report. Ohio Conference on Freight September 17-18, 2007 Mark Vonderembse Mark.Vonderembse@utoledo.edu 419-530-4319. Vision Statement.

chuck
Download Presentation

Ohio Conference on Freight September 17-18, 2007 Mark Vonderembse Mark.Vonderembse@utoledo

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. University of Toledo (UT)Intermodal Transportation Institutehttp://research.utoledo.edu/ITI/ITI.htm Status Report Ohio Conference on FreightSeptember 17-18, 2007 Mark Vonderembse Mark.Vonderembse@utoledo.edu 419-530-4319

  2. Vision Statement • To develop technology-enabled intermodal transportation systems and supply chains that promote economic development and quality of life.

  3. Mission Statement • To provide research, education and training, and planning and technical assistance in developing and maintaining technology enabled, efficient, secure, and environmentally sound transportation systems, supply chains, and logistic processes.

  4. Focus Areas: Alternate Fuels, Infrastructure Utilization, and Supply Chain Applications Infrastructure Utilization Alternate Fuels Economic Vitality Supply Chains Based on an interdisciplinary approach that links engineering, technology, business, and geography and planning

  5. ITI Organizational Structure ITI Oversight Committee: VP for Research Development, Deans from Arts and Sciences, Business, Engineering, and Law Advisory Board & Executive Committee: Public and Private Sector Organizations ITI Director Assistant Director Half-Time Secretary Draw Resources from across UT as well as BGSU

  6. University of Toledo’s Evolving Role

  7. Achieving Success • Securing designation as a US DOT, University Transportation Center http://www.utoledo.edu/research/ututc/ • Relationship Building • Identifying compelling projects: Bio-Diesel Study

  8. U.S. Department of Transportation University Transportation Center • Internationally recognized centers of excellence, fully integrated within institutions of higher learning • Designed to advance U.S. technology and expertise in the many disciplines comprising transportation • UT designated as a Tier II UTC and funded for $500,000 per year for four years ($2 million) • UT is one of five members of a second UTC that is led by the University of Detroit Mercy (UDM) and funded for a similar amount

  9. Relationship Building through Successful Projects • Midwest Freight Research • Midwest Regional University Transportation Center (MRUTC) • AASHTO Mississippi Valley • Center for Freight Infrastructure Research and Education (CFIRE) • Great Lakes Maritime Research Institute (GLMRI) • Army Corp of Engineers • International Cargo Handling and Coordination Association (ICHCA)

  10. Midwest Freight Research • Upper Midwest States Freight Study • Partnership with University of Wisconsin-Madison and University of Illinois-Chicago • UT holds the data for a seven state region • Endorsed by CEOs of the DOTs for AASHTO Mississippi Region: Expanded to ten states http://www.mississippivalleyfreight.org/ • Worked with UWM to secure funding for CFIRE, which is a National University Transportation Center http://www.wistrans.org/cfire/

  11. Great Lakes Maritime Research Institute • Detroit to Windsor Ferry Crossing Study • Great Lakes Maritime Information Delivery System: Phase I, II, and III – Basis for expanding shipping on the Great Lakes (Participants: Army Corp of Engineers, St. Lawrence Seaway Commission, Lake Carriers Association, US Coast Guard, and many others) • Third meeting set of October 26, 2007 • Establish Great Lakes Maritime Exchange • http://www.glmri.org/

  12. Army Corp of Engineers • Funded to develop and maintain database for all docks and ports on the Great Lakes with GPS and dock capability data, • Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Seaway Transportation Rate Analysis • Successful technical review of last study • Leads to taking leadership for the next study

  13. ICHCA: International Research and Education Panel • UT and ICHCA are working together to create the panel • ICHCA is a membership organization of more than 1,000 transportation professionals from 80 countries • ICHCA promotes new technologies and best practice for efficient movement of goods by coordinating all modes of transportation • http://www.ichcainternational.co.uk/ • Partnership will identify and assemble resources from across the universities and bring them to bear on industry’s needs Regions of current activity: North America, North Africa, India, Korea, Japan, China, Australia, and Malaysia Third Panel meeting set for October 25 and 26 in Toledo, Ohio http://www.business.utoledo.edu/scm/ (prior meetings Singapore)

  14. BIO-Diesel Study • Objectives: Evaluate the impact of using bio-diesel on operating costs, emissions, engine performance, and engine life at TARTA and the City of Toledo • US DOT sponsored (funded for $1.5 million) • Unique aspects of the project: • First study to do on-road testing of ultra-low sulfur diesel • First attempt to investigate the impact of using B-20 (20% bio-fuel and 80% diesel) made with ultra-low sulfur diesel • First study to examine the use of hydrogen gas as an additive to B-20 • Thorough testing: 60 vehicles, three years, more than 5 million miles • Life cycle costing • In-bus air quality tests in addition to tail pipe emission tests

  15. Bio-Diesel Study: First Year Results • Minimal costs to switch from ultra-low sulfur diesel to B-20 • No significant difference in “on-going” operating costs • B-20 had high mpg in some engines and some applications compared to diesel • Maintenance costs and engine wear are similar • Emission from tail pipe and inside the bus are similar • Hydrogen injections increased mpg by about 10 % • TARTA expected to expand the use of bio-diesel to 35 new buses it is purchasing

  16. Rich Martinko, ITI and UTC DirectorChristine Lonsway, ITI and UTC Assistant DirectorGloria Cook, Secretary

More Related