1 / 37

BC’s Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform

BC’s Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform. Prepared by Wendy Bergerud (updated May 2013). Brief History. Push for electoral reform 1996: Liberals lose the election even though they get more of the popular vote --> promise electoral reform

chung
Download Presentation

BC’s Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. BC’s Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform Prepared by Wendy Bergerud(updated May 2013)

  2. Brief History • Push for electoral reform • 1996: Liberals lose the election even though they get more of the popular vote --> promise electoral reform • 1998: Fair Voting BC was formed and pushes for electoral reform. • 2001: Liberal party wins 77 out of 79 seats with 57.6% of the popular vote.

  3. Brief History • Push for electoral reform (cont.) • 2002: Adriane Carr (Leader of Green Party) conducts a “Free your Vote” Campaign, pushing for voting reform. • Liberals follow through on promise: • Gordon Gibson designs citizens’ assembly process. • 2003: Assembly process set in motion and members randomly selected.

  4. BCCAER Mission:Look at Voting Systems and decide if a change should be considered.

  5. Podium Main Room for Plenary Sessions Photo by Kent Kallberg

  6. Mandate of the Assembly • Examine various models for electing Members of the Legislature • Consult with British Columbians • Issue a report recommending whether • The current system should be retained, or • Another model should be adopted

  7. Assembly Composition • 160 members + Chair • Member selection • British Columbians, randomly selected from the voters list, are invited to volunteer. • From those who volunteered, a man and a woman are randomly chosen from each riding.

  8. How would we measure success?That our decision, whatever that might be, would be agreed to by most of us.

  9. Assembly process • Learning – about electoral systems (Jan–Mar) • Listening – 50 public hearings (May–June) • Reading – 1603 written submissions • Deliberating – coming to decision (Sept–Nov) • Report and recommendation (Dec 10, 2004) • Assembly disbands • Referendum – May 17, 2005 AND May 12, 2009

  10. Learning Phase

  11. Photo by Doug Waller

  12. Photo by Doug Waller

  13. Small Discussion Groups an opportunity for the quiet ones to get a word or two in

  14. Photo by Fred Shum

  15. Public Hearings

  16. One member’s attempt to spread the word! Photo by F. W. Zens

  17. From our resident Cartoonist: Chuck Walker Cartoon by Chuck Walker

  18. Photo by Doug Waller

  19. Summer Vacation Reading 1600 submissions!

  20. Cartoon by Chuck Walker

  21. Deliberation PhaseHow do we make this OUR decision?

  22. There was broad consensus that just two electoral system families came close to meeting our values.So we would build a preferred model of each.

  23. Then choose the one we thought best matched our values.That alternate would then be compared to our current system for our final choice and recommendation.

  24. Photo by Doug Waller

  25. How did we vote? • First Vote: STV (123) vs MMP (31) • Second Vote: Do recommend retaining the current system? Yes (11) vs No (142) • Third Vote: Do we recommend BC-STV to the people of BC? Yes (146) vs No (7)

  26. Finalizing our Report

  27. Photo by Doug Waller

  28. Cartoon by Chuck Walker

  29. Mission Accomplished! Photo by Kent Kallbert

  30. 2005 Referendum • Threshold was 60% popular vote AND a 50% pass in 60% (or 48) ridings. • Vote obtained was 57.7% popular vote and a 50% pass in 77 of 79 ridings (95%). • Since neither party in legislature supported voting reform, BC-STV was not implemented although the legislature had the authority to do so.

  31. Outcome of 1st Referendum • Government decided that voters needed more information to make a decision. • There would be a second referendum. • The Electoral Boundaries Commission, mandated to create new boundaries, would have an additional task: designing BC-STV boundaries as well. • Final boundaries available at ???

  32. BC-STV Maps • Commission grouped the single member ridings into multi-member BC-STV districts. • Legislature modified the commission’s advice, choosing 85 ridings instead of 83. • These 85 ridings are grouped into 20 BC-STV districts with between 2 and 7 MLAs. Average District Magnitude was 4.25.

  33. Referendum Question • Second referendum: May 12, 2009. • Which electoral system should British Columbia use to elect members to the provincial Legislative Assembly? • The existing electoral system (First-Past-the-Post) • The single transferable vote electoral system (BC-STV) proposed by the Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform .

  34. Referendum Details • Threshold remained the same: at least 60% of the popular vote and 60% of the ridings (51 of 85) must pass it at the 50% level. • Funding of $500,000 was made available to both a neutral information office and both sides of the debate.

  35. Outcome of 2nd Referendum • Threshold remained 60% popular vote AND a 50% pass in 60% (or 51) ridings. • Vote obtained was 39.1% popular vote and a 50% pass in just 8 of 85 ridings (9%).

  36. Websites • Official Assembly Web Site (not always up): www.citizensassembly.bc.ca • Fair Voting BC: http://fairvotingbc.com/ • Fair Vote Canada: http://www.fairvote.ca/ • Interesting STV results for Ireland: election.polarbears.com or election.polarbears.com/online/da2002.htm

  37. Credits • This slide show wouldn’t have been possible without Doug Waller’s photographic work. • Pictures taken during our assembly meetingsby Doug Waller, Fred Shum, Kent Kallberg, and Wendy Bergerud. • Contributions to design and ideas: Wendy Bergerud, Brooke Bannister, Sheila MacDermott, Diana Byford, Ray Jones, . . . • And BC’s former assembly staff: Marilyn Jacobson, Don MacLachlan, and Leo Perra.

More Related