Hierachical Galaxy Formation Model: Galacticus arXiv: 1006.5394, 1008.1786

1. Hierachical Galaxy Formation Model: GalacticusarXiv: 1006.5394, 1008.1786 Jianling Gan

2. Outline • Background theory • Main evolution engine • Physical implementation • Event processing • Conclusions

3. Cold dark matter model • The cosmic structure is formed during the collapse of dark matter due to gravitational instability, and the virial structure is seen as dark matter halo. • The baryonic gas condense in the radiative cooling and fall into the halo, and finally form a galaxy, before which there exist a complicated set of physical processes. • The halo formation is processed in a hierarchical manner that small haloes form first, and they subsequently merge to form bigger haloes.

4. Outline • Background theory • Main evolution engine • Physical implementation • Event processing • Conclusions

5. Merger tree • Galacticus evolves the galaxies based on the merger trees, which either be generated by itself or read from files. • Algorithm of cole et al. (2000) and Parkinson et al. (2008): Extend press schechter (EPS) theory, Monte Carlo techniques

6. Node evolution engine Event: Node promotion Node 4, 6, 10 evolve forward in time and grow.

7. Node evolution engine Event: node accretion Node 7 becomes a subhalo of node 6, while node 6 becomes subhalo of node 4.

8. Node evolution engine Event: satellite merging Node 6 reaches the center of its host node 4 due to the action of dynamical friction.

9. Node evolution engine Galacticus evolves all nodes till final time (present, z=0) and outputs any properties.

10. Outline • Background theory • Main evolution engine • Physical implementation • Event processing • Conclusions

11. Halo properties • Isothermal • NFW • Hernquist • … Density profile: • Halo spin is randomly assigned from • A lognormal distribution • The distribution found by Bett et al.(2007) • …

12. Satellite node (subhalo) orbit • No orbital integration; the subhalo is to be merged within a timescale given by • Lacey & Cole (1993) • Jiang et al. (2008) • Boylan-Kolchin et al. (2008) • …

13. Gas • Accretion of gas in to halos: • Depend on the rate at which halo’s mass is growing and the effects of reionization (e.g., Benson et al. 2002). • Cooling of gas inside halos: • Using the algorithm developed by White & Frenk (1991) and thereafter.

14. Initial mass function • Chabrier et al. 2001 • Kennicutt 1983 • Kroupa 2001 • Miller & Scalo 1979 • Salpeter 1955 • Scalo 1986 • …

15. Star formation and chemical enrichment • Stellar population spectra calculated from the FSPS v2.1 code of Conroy et al. (2009) • Star formation timescales: power law (as used by cole et al. 2000) • Instantaneous recycling or Non-instantaneous recycling (optional)

16. Feedback • Energy input to the ISM from Stellar winds; fitting formulae of Leitherer et al. (1992) • Supernovae; energy input to ISM and mass outflow, Nagashima et al. (2005); Heger & Woosley (2002) … • Spermassive black hole (optional): • Radio-mode, any jet from the black hole accretion disk, Shakura & Sunyaev (1973); Meire (2001); Benson & Babul (2009) • Quasar-mode, Ostriker et al. 2010

17. Galactic disk (optional) • Exponential disk: • Mass of gas in the disk • Mass of elements in the gaseous disk • Mass of stars in the disk • Mass of elements in the stellar disk • Luminsity of the stellar disk • Angular momentum of the disk • Scale length of the disk • Circular velocity of the disk

18. Halo response to baryon cooling (optional) • Null response, the gravitation potential is dark matter dominated • Adiabatic contraction, algorithm of Gnedin et al. (2004)

19. Outline • Background theory • Main evolution engine • Physical implementation • Event processing • Conclusions

20. Node promotion • The dark matter halo properties of a node is updated to equal that of its parent node. • Any hot halo properties (the properties of gas and heavy elements) of the parent node are added to those of the node prior to promotion.

21. Node accretion • The subhalo begins its orbital and mass evolution. • If [starveSatellites] is true, any hot halo properties (the properties of gas and heavy elements) of the minor node are transferred to those of the major node. Additionally, any material outflowed from the satellite galaxy to its hot halo is transferred to the host halo of the host halo at each timestep.

22. Satellite merging • The mass of the satellite becomes part of the central galaxy and its host halo. • Disk may be destroyed, created or modified (Cole et al. 2000). • If [starveSatellites] is false, any hot halo properties (the properties of gas and heavy elements) of the satellite node are transferred to those of the host node. • The black hole in the two merging galaxies are instantaneously merged (Rezzolla et al. 2008).

23. Outline • Background theory • Main evolution engine • Physical implementation • Event processing • Conclusions

24. Outputs • Hierachical data format, HDF5 • Galacticus outputs any properties of galaxies and their associated dark matter halos in all merger trees. • Optionally, Galacticus can output the merger trees prior to any evolution.

25. Advantage • An useful and open source galaxy formation code; • Includes several decades of previous work, White & Rees (1978); White & Frenk (1991); Kauffmann et al. (1993); Cole et al. (2000); Somerville et al. (2008)… • All function are easily to be extended. Thank you!