1 / 37

Mathematics

Mathematics. Indicators and Goals. Math Tier II Indicator. Indicator 1.8 : All junior high students will meet or exceed standards and be identified as proficient on the MEAP tests in reading, writing, math , science and social studies.

chyna
Download Presentation

Mathematics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mathematics Indicators and Goals

  2. Math Tier II Indicator Indicator 1.8:All junior high students will meet or exceed standards and be identified as proficient on the MEAP tests in reading, writing, math, science and social studies. • Math Tier II Indicator: Increase the number of students who score at proficient or higher in mathematics. • S.M.A.R.T. Goal 1: The percentage of Davis 7th, 8th and 9th grade students scoring proficient or higher in mathematics will increase as measured by the MEAP or EXPLORE math assessments.

  3. Math Tier II Indicator Indicator 1.9:Seventh and eighth graders who receive special education services will show specified growth on the MI-Access test in reading, writing, and mathematics. • Math Tier II Indicator: Increase the number of students who score at proficient or higher in mathematics. • S.M.A.R.T. Goal 2: The percentage of Davis 7th and 8th grade students who show growth in mathematics will increase as measured by the MI-Access test.

  4. Math Tier II Indicator Indicator 1.13:All 7th through 9th graders will demonstrate proficiency on the district math, science, and social studies tests. • Math Tier II Indicator: Increase the number of students who score at proficient or higher in mathematics. • S.M.A.R.T. Goal 3: The percentage of Davis 7th, 8th and 9th grade students scoring proficient (80% or higher) in mathematics will increase as measured by the UCS District Common Math Semester assessments.

  5. Increase the percentage of Davis students achieving math proficiency • MEAP:Davis revised the annual ‘percentage of students proficient’ targets for 7th & 8th grade math MEAP proficiency to reach the 2014 100% district proficiency goal. • 85% for Fall of 2010 • 91% for Fall of 2011 • 96% for Fall of 2012 • 100% for Fall of 2013

  6. Increase the percentage of Davis students achieving math proficiency • DISTRICT COMMON ASSESSMENTS: • Davis will establish baseline data and Smart Goals for each mathematics course that include all enrolled students as common assessments are developed and administered. • Math 7, Math 7 AT, Math 8, Math 8 AT, Advanced Math 7, Algebra 1, Geometry, and Accelerated Geometry. • A raw score of 80% will be the minimum standard for proficiency in all mathematics courses.

  7. Data Analysis MEAP and ACT/EXPLORE

  8. 2009 - 2010 MEAP Results 7th & 8th grade Math Proficiency by Grade

  9. 2009 - 2010 MEAP Results 7th grade - 3% below district average

  10. 2009 - 2010 MEAP Results 8th grade - 4% below district average

  11. 2009 - 2010 MEAP Results Davis Subgroup - 7th & 8th Students with Disabilities

  12. 2009 - 2010 MEAP Results Davis Subgroup - 7th /8th grade Gender Trend

  13. 2009 - 2010 MEAP Results 7th grade Proficiency Trend

  14. 2009 - 2010 MEAP Results 7th grade Mathematics 9%

  15. 2009 - 2010 MEAP Results 8th grade Proficiency Trend

  16. 2009 - 2010 MEAP Results 8th grade Mathematics ~6%

  17. 2009 - 2010 MEAP Results 7th grade Mathematics - Subgroups 17% gender difference

  18. 2009 - 2010 MEAP Results 7th grade Mathematics- Students with Disabilities

  19. 2009 - 2010 MEAP Results 8th grade Mathematics- Subgroups 6% gender difference 7% increase in Level 4; significant downward migration Level 3 absent; large increase in Level 4 that was absent in grade 7 Upward Movement! Significant downward movement Not much change

  20. 2009 - 2010 MEAP Results 8th grade Mathematics- Students with Disabilities

  21. 2009 - 2010 MEAP Results 7th grade Mathematics- Students Weaknesses

  22. 2009 - 2010 MEAP Results 7th grade Mathematics- Strand Analysis

  23. 2009 - 2010 MEAP Results 8th grade Mathematics- Students Weaknesses

  24. 2009 - 2010 MEAP Results 8th grade Mathematics- Strand Analysis

  25. 2009 - 2010 EXPLORE Results 9th grade - 5% below district average

  26. 2009 - 2010 EXPLORE Results 9th grade Mathematics - Proficiency Trend

  27. 2009 - 2010 EXPLORE Results 9th grade Mathematics - Gender Trend

  28. 2009 - 2010 EXPLORE Results 9th grade Mathematics- Students with Disabilities

  29. 2009 - 2010 EXPLORE Results 9th grade Mathematics - Proficiency

  30. 2009 - 2010 EXPLORE Results 9th grade Mathematics - Subgroups

  31. 2009 - 2010 EXPLORE Results 9th grade Mathematics - Strengths and Weaknesses Probability, Statistics, and Data Analysis Properties of Plane Figures

  32. 2009 - 2010 EXPLORE Results 9th grade Mathematics- Item Breakdown by Strand Low performing strands account for 26% of test.

  33. Mathematics Action Plan

  34. School-wide support in the Math, Science, Social Studies, and Allied Arts departments through applied problem-solving, data analysis, and graphical interpretation as it applies to the specific content area. 2010 - 2011 Action Plan 7th - 9th grade Davis’ Goal: Improve student math proficiency

  35. 2010 - 2011 Action Plan 7th - 9th grade Mathematics

  36. 2010 - 2011 Action Plan 7th - 9th grade Mathematics

  37. 2010 - 2011 Action Plan 7th - 9th grade Mathematics

More Related