120 likes | 201 Views
Tool Development for an ELO-like Organization. What makes sense?. Tools: What makes sense?. Appropriate scale, goals Be specific to our community. Tools: What makes sense?. Appropriate scale, goals Not beyond our resources
E N D
Tool Development for an ELO-like Organization What makes sense?
Tools: What makes sense? • Appropriate scale, goals • Be specific to our community
Tools: What makes sense? • Appropriate scale, goals • Not beyond our resources • Not competing for users with large entities (commercial or open source) • Not trying to talk people out of using their current tools, but providing something else
Tools: What makes sense? • Be specific to our community • In areas where tools exist, concentrate on how they can work for our constituents • For new development, do what others won’t
Where tools exist • Test widely, contribute narrowly • Preference for open and free tools • What’s needed may not be technical
Where tools exist • Test widely, contribute narrowly • e.g., what current emulation projects can help? • Is there one we should help improve?
Where tools exist • Preference for open and free tools • Open source and free-as-in-beer • e.g., TidyLib vs. commercial, if both work (or if both would need significant contribution)
Where tools exist • What’s needed may not be technical • A tool may exist, but be too expensive, and we can organizationally engineer access to it • A tool may exist, but be too difficult to use, and we can either engineer assistance or an improved interface
Segue: what if no tools exist? • We should do what others won’t, even if we lobby them and/or help • Again, we should do things specific to our community
What others won’t do • Elit beyond reading and writing • High risk, high gain projects
What others won’t do • Elit beyond reading and writing • Tools for scholarship and education • Tools for preservation and archiving • Still build on work of others (e.g., Eclipse) • We have to do this, or it won’t happen — and our constituents will continue to try to function without appropriate tools
What others won’t do • High risk, high gain projects • Elit creation tools (what if we could support a tool that tried to enable a new genre each year?) • Still build on work of others (extend existing commercial/open source tools or make research tools usable) • We don’t have to do this, but it would be exciting • Probably structure as subgrants