250 likes | 457 Views
Global Business Environment. Economic environment: capital movement, FDI. Readings. World Investment Report 2009 . Overview. pp. 4-22. http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/ wir2009overview_en.pdf The OLI Paradigm. http://www.investmentsandincome.com/investments/oli-paradigm.html.
E N D
Global Business Environment Economic environment: capital movement, FDI
Readings World Investment Report 2009. Overview. pp. 4-22. http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/wir2009overview_en.pdf The OLI Paradigm. http://www.investmentsandincome.com/investments/oli-paradigm.html
International movements of capital • Types of capital movements: • Official flows (grants) • International borrowings and lendings • Portfolio investments • Foreign direct investments
FDI Foreign direct investment refers to investment in which a firm in one country directly controls or owns a subsidiary in another. If a foreign company invests in at least 10% of the stock in a subsidiary, the two firms are typically classified as a multinational corporation. • 10% or more of ownership in stock is deemed to be sufficient for direct control of business operations. • In addition, international borrowing and lending sometimes occurs between a parent company and its subsidiary
Location and internalization Why are multinational corporations created and why do they undertake direct foreign investment? • Location: why is a good produced in two countries rather than in one country and then exported to the second country? • Internalization: why is production in different locations done by one firm rather that by separate firms?
Location Why production occurs in separate location is often determined by • the location of necessary factors of production: • mining occurs where minerals are; • labor intensive production occurs where relatively large pools of labor live. • transportation costs and other barriers to trade may also influence the location of production. • These factors also influence the pattern of trade.
Internalisation Internalization occurs because it is more profitable to conduct transactions and production within a single organization than in separate organizations. Reasons for this include: • Technology transfers: transfer of knowledge or another form of technology may be easier within a single organization than through a market transaction between separate organizations. • Patent or property rights may be weak or non-existent. • Knowledge may not be easily packaged and sold.
Internalisation • Vertical integration involves consolidation of different stages of a production process. • Vertical integration would involve consolidation of one firm that produces a good that is used as an input for another firm. • This may be more efficient than having production operated by separate firms. • For example, having farms and flour mills consolidate into one organization to make flour may be more efficient that have farms and flour mills as separate organizations.
Trends in FDI • Flow and stock increased in the last 20 years • In spite of decline of trade barriers, FDI has grown more rapidly than world trade because • Businesses fear protectionist pressures • FDI is seen a a way of circumventing trade barriers • Dramatic political and economic changes in many parts of the world • Globalization of the world economy has raised the vision of firms who now see the entire world as their market
The Direction of FDI • Historically, most FDI has been directed at the developed nations of the world as firms based in advanced countries invested in other markets • The US has been the favorite target for FDI inflows • While developed nations still account for the largest share of FDI inflows, FDI into developing nations has increased • Most recent inflows into developing nations have been targeted at the emerging economies of South, East, and Southeast Asia
Costs of FDI to Host Countries • Adverse effects on competition • Adverse effects on the balance of payments • After the initial capital inflow there is normally a subsequent outflow of earnings • Foreign subsidiaries could import a substantial number of inputs • National sovereignty and autonomy • Some host governments worry that FDI is accompanied by some loss of economic independence resulting in the host country’s economy being controlled by a foreign corporation
Political Ideology and FDI Radical View Pragmatic Nationalism Free Market
The Radical View • Marxist view: MNE’s exploit less-developed host countries • Extract profits • Give nothing of value in exchange • Instrument of domination, not development • Keep less-developed countries relatively backward and dependent on capitalist nations for investment, jobs, and technology
The Radical View • By the end of the 1980s radical view was in retreat • Collapse of communism • Bad economic performance of countries that embraced the radical view • Strong economic performance of countries who embraced capitalism rather than the radical view
The Free Market View • Nations specialize in goods and services that they can produce most efficiently • Resource transfers benefit and strengthen the host country • Positive changes in laws and growth of bilateral agreements attest to strength of free market view • All countries impose some restrictions on FDI
Pragmatic Nationalism • FDI has benefits and costs • Allow FDI if benefits outweigh costs • Block FDI that harms indigenous industry • Court FDI that is in national interest • Tax breaks • Subsidies
Regional development implications of FDI • Post Communist Eastern Europe, e.g. Czech Republic, Slovenia • Foreign direct investment (FDI) has been accorded a central role in the post-communist economic transformation of Central and Eastern Europe. • Regional effects of FDI in Central Europe (Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia) in the 1990s. • Defining FDI’s role in regional economic transformations • Intensification of uneven development • Development of a Dual Economy • Failure to develop linkages with local and regional economies • Contribution to increased regional economic instability
Motivations of foreign direct investments • Resource-seeking investments: • Row materials, energy, natural resources, • Low-cost labour, • Low-cost human capital. • Market-seekinginvestments: • Green-field investments, • Brown-field investments, • Mergers & acquisitions.
Motivations of foreign direct investments • Efficiency-seekinginvestments: • Factor proportions, • Differentiation of products, • Economy of scales. • Strategic-advantage-seeking investments: • Long-term advantage of acquisition.
Main sources of advantages of multinational firms • Ownership-specific advantages • Location-specific advantage • Internalization (technology transfer, vertical integration) = OLI paradigm (Dunning) • Dunning: productivity of US firms in UK in the 1950’s – US firms in the UK are more productive than UK firms (because of best managerial skills, know-how, etc.)
Vernon’s Product Life Cycle (PLC) theory Phases: home production; export; export of capital; foreign production. • Porter – strategic management • Three groups of international enterprises • Exporting domestic enterprise, • Multi-domestic enterprise (management in every country, negligible central co-ordination) • Global enterprise (centrally co-ordinated).
Strategic alliances Main specificities ofstrategic alliances: • Basic autonomy of the partners remain, • Long-term, • Mutually advantageous co-operation, • Resources make available for one another, • Integration of specific functions.
Advantages and disadvantages for recipient countries Advantages: • Increase of financial resources, • Foreign trade sufficit, • Positive effect on employment (both direct and indirect), • Technology transfer, • Import of know-how, • Better structure of foreign relations, • Diminution of risks.
Advantages and disadvantages for recipient countries Disadvantages • Less economic autonomy, • Technological dependence, • Local resources in foreign control, • Increasing foreign involvement, • Undesired structural changes, • Increasing risks (profit), • Bad structure of foreign relations.