1 / 16

Change Management/ Accountability Plan December 12, 2003

Change Management/ Accountability Plan December 12, 2003. Change Management Plan. Key Stakeholder List. Legend: H = High M = Medium L = Low. Stakeholder Management Support vs. Influence Grid. Support. Influence. Stakeholders Support vs. Influence. DRB. Maintenance Supt.

cicely
Download Presentation

Change Management/ Accountability Plan December 12, 2003

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Change Management/Accountability PlanDecember 12, 2003

  2. Change Management Plan

  3. Key Stakeholder List • Legend: H = High • M = Medium • L = Low

  4. Stakeholder Management Support vs. Influence Grid Support Influence Stakeholders Support vs. Influence DRB Maintenance Supt. Facilities Engineers Head Operators Project Managers

  5. Detailed analysis of Stakeholders and AccountabilityFor each stakeholder include: Drivers Support/Influence/Interest Risks Mitigation Expectations / Strategy (for more complex Stakeholders)

  6. Drivers Increasing Support Importance of IRIS project to Operations and Maintenance at SJVBU Focus on cost reduction and process improvement to optimize IRIS process Success for project team Resources available for implementation of pilot project Drivers Decreasing Support Reduced support if the project timeline is extended for several months Projects fails to deliver on business case. SJVBU: $10MM savings over 3 yrs Reduced support if production is disrupted Poor documentation or support packages DRB - Drivers

  7. DRB - Risk • Legend: H = High • M = Medium • L = Low

  8. Drivers Increasing Support Improved competitive position Reduced Opex and metrics that support success of project Reduce material costs when using surplus materials Clear accountability for project deliverables Resources available for implementation of pilot project Drivers Decreasing Support Reduced support if the project takes a long time to get results or fails to deliver on business case Reduced support if production is disrupted Any increases in current costs Failure to engage and communicate project milestones and results Maintenance Superintendents - Drivers

  9. Maintenance Superintendents - Risk • Legend: H = High • M = Medium • L = Low

  10. Drivers Increasing Support Improved competitive position Reduced Opex and metrics that support success of project Minimized impact on operations Clear accountability for project deliverables. Alignment with PMP Positive Reinforcement from SJVBU management for support of project Training provided on new process and system Drivers Decreasing Support Reduced support if the project takes a long time to get results or fails to deliver on business case Reduced support if production is disrupted Any increases in current costs Failure to engage and communicate project milestones and results Head Operators (H.O.’s) - Drivers

  11. Head Operators (H.O.’s) - Risk • Legend: H = High • M = Medium • L = Low

  12. Drivers Increasing Support Improve competitive position Reduce Opex and meet metrics Minimize disruptions Project schedule and budget delivered as planned Training provided on new process and system Positive Reinforcement from SJVBU management for support of project Drivers Decreasing Support Reduced support if the project takes a long time to get results or fails to deliver on business case Reduced support if own project is disrupted Any increases in current costs Failure to engage and communicate project milestones and results Project Managers - Drivers

  13. Project Managers - Risk • Legend: H = High • M = Medium • L = Low

  14. Drivers Increasing Support Improve competitive position Reduce Opex and meet metrics Minimize disruptions Project schedule and budget delivered as planned Training provided on new process and system Positive Reinforcement from SJVBU management for support of project Drivers Decreasing Support Reduced support if the project takes a long time to get results or fails to deliver on business case Reduced support if own project is disrupted Failure to engage and communicate project milestones and results Facility Engineers – Drivers

  15. Facility Engineers - Risk • Legend: H = High • M = Medium • L = Low

  16. Other Risks

More Related