660 likes | 871 Views
Hood River Basin Water Study. Agenda 1. Study Overview - Partners - Goals - Study flow chart 2. Results - Hood River Basin Water Use - Water Conservation Potential - Water Storage Assessment - Projected Climate - Hydrology
E N D
Hood River Basin Water Study Agenda 1. Study Overview - Partners - Goals - Study flow chart 2. Results - Hood River Basin Water Use - Water Conservation Potential - Water Storage Assessment - Projected Climate - Hydrology - Groundwater - Water Resource - Fish Habitat 3. Recommendations
Overview - Partners 1. United States Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) $250,000 in-kind contribution through WaterSMART Basin Study program. 2. Oregon Water Resources Department (OWRD) $250,000 Water Conservation, Reuse, and Storage Grant. - Watershed Professional Network (Water Use, Water Conservation, PM) - Normandeau Associates (IFIM) - USGS (Groundwater) - HRC (Mattie)
Overview - Goals Evaluate: 1. Current and future water demands 2. Water conservation opportunities 3. Groundwater resources 4. Impacts of climate change to streamflow 5. Alternatives to maintain viable water use/supply 6. Impacts to fish habitat from climate and water supply alternatives
Overview of Water Planning Study Climate Change Models 3 sets of Projected Meteorological Data Historical Meteorological Data Historical Precipitation Data Water Use Assessment Water Conservation Assessment Water Storage Assessment Surface Water Model (DHSVM) Groundwater Model (MODFLOW) • Future Water Demands • Water conservation • Population change • 4 Different Scenarios: • 1 Historical streamflow timeseries • 3 Projected streamflow timeseries Well pumping scenario? ASR scenario? Potential new storage site(s) Existing WR Infrastructure Existing WR Operations Existing Water Demands Water Rights Water Resources Model (MODSIM) Instream Flow AWS / Q relationships • Evaluation of WR Metrics under Each Alternatives: • Deliveries (shortfall amount, duration, % of time, cost) • Reservoir volumes • Hydropower Production • Streamflows Habitat Suitability Analysis
Overview of Water Planning Study Climate Change Models 3 sets of Projected Meteorological Data Historical Meteorological Data Historical Precipitation Data Water Use Assessment Water Conservation Assessment Water Storage Assessment Surface Water Model (DHSVM) Groundwater Model (MODFLOW) • Future Water Demands • Water conservation • Population change • 4 Different Scenarios: • 1 Historical streamflow timeseries • 3 Projected streamflow timeseries Well pumping scenario? ASR scenario? Potential new storage site(s) Existing WR Infrastructure Existing WR Operations Existing Water Demands Water Rights Water Resources Model (MODSIM) Instream Flow AWS / Q relationships • Evaluation of WR Metrics under Each Alternatives: • Deliveries (shortfall amount, duration, % of time, cost) • Reservoir volumes • Hydropower Production • Streamflows Habitat Suitability Analysis
Water Use Assessment - Summary Potable water use 8 – 13 CFS. 6 districts, The Dalles biggest annual user Irrigation water use 0 - 230 CFS. 5 districts, ~20,000 acres Hydropower water use 80 – 140 CFS. Peaks in winter and spring, both FID/MFID reduce in irrigation season Industrial water use small (< few CFS) Limited industrial water users Instream has 8 water rights, 2 instream flow agreements Instream lower priority water rights dates, often not met
Water Use Assessment - Instream • 8 instream rights • (priority dates from • 1983-1998) • 2 instream flow agreements • (no priority dates)
Overview of Water Planning Study Climate Change Models 3 sets of Projected Meteorological Data Historical Meteorological Data Historical Precipitation Data Water Use Assessment Water Conservation Assessment Water Storage Assessment Surface Water Model (DHSVM) Groundwater Model (MODFLOW) • Future Water Demands • Water conservation • Population change • 4 Different Scenarios: • 1 Historical streamflow timeseries • 3 Projected streamflow timeseries Well pumping scenario? ASR scenario? Potential new storage site(s) Existing WR Infrastructure Existing WR Operations Existing Water Demands Water Rights Water Resources Model (MODSIM) Instream Flow AWS / Q relationships • Evaluation of WR Metrics under Each Alternatives: • Deliveries (shortfall amount, duration, % of time, cost) • Reservoir volumes • Hydropower Production • Streamflows Habitat Suitability Analysis
Water Conservation Assessment - Conclusions Potable: conservation potential ~2-3 CFS • Can be achieved through toilet and shower retrofits, outdoor use reductions, and implementing rate-structure based Irrigation: conservation potential ~40 CFS • Achieved through sprinkler retrofits (16 CFS) and piping (20-30 CFS) Hydropower • Water conservation leads to ~$20K of addt’l revenue. Bypass reach still dewatered, but increased flow downstream of tailrace Sediment • Active technologies very expensive for high flow rates. Gravity settling should be used for removing sediment from irrigation supply
Water Conservation Assessment - Irrigation • Potential water savings from converting impact to micro sprinklers: • 49% of impact sprinklers converted • impacts using 2.4 feet/year (SWCD) • micro sprinklers using 1.5 feet/year (SWCD) • $1,200/acre to convert to micro (IrriNet) ~ $0.4 M per CFS
Water Conservation Assessment - Irrigation • Potential from pipe and/or operational changes: • DID piping of main distribution system • EFID piping of canals eliminating seepage and 60 overflow points
Overview of Water Planning Study Climate Change Models 3 sets of Projected Meteorological Data Historical Meteorological Data Historical Precipitation Data Water Use Assessment Water Conservation Assessment Water Storage Assessment Surface Water Model (DHSVM) Groundwater Model (MODFLOW) • Future Water Demands • Water conservation • Population change • 4 Different Scenarios: • 1 Historical streamflow timeseries • 3 Projected streamflow timeseries Well pumping scenario? ASR scenario? Existing WR Infrastructure Existing WR Operations Existing Water Demands Water Rights Potential new storage site(s) Water Resources Model (MODSIM) Instream Flow AWS / Q relationships • Evaluation of WR Metrics under Each Alternatives: • Deliveries (shortfall amount, duration, % of time, cost) • Reservoir volumes • Hydropower Production • Streamflows Habitat Suitability Analysis
Water Storage Assessment Kingsley Reservoir (upper)
Overview of Water Planning Study Climate Change Models 3 sets of Projected Meteorological Data Historical Meteorological Data Historical Precipitation Data Water Use Assessment Water Conservation Assessment Water Storage Assessment Surface Water Model (DHSVM) Groundwater Model (MODFLOW) • Future Water Demands • Water conservation • Population change • 4 Different Scenarios: • 1 Historical streamflow timeseries • 3 Projected streamflow timeseries Well pumping scenario? ASR scenario? Potential new storage site(s) Existing WR Infrastructure Existing WR Operations Existing Water Demands Water Rights Water Resources Model (MODSIM) Instream Flow AWS / Q relationships • Evaluation of WR Metrics under Each Alternatives: • Deliveries (shortfall amount, duration, % of time, cost) • Reservoir volumes • Hydropower Production • Streamflows Habitat Suitability Analysis
Climate Change - temp & precip projections 3 different climate scenarios
Overview of Water Planning Study Climate Change Models 3 sets of Projected Meteorological Data Historical Meteorological Data Historical Precipitation Data Water Use Assessment Water Conservation Assessment Water Storage Assessment Surface Water Model (DHSVM) Groundwater Model (MODFLOW) • Future Water Demands • Water conservation • Population change • 4 Different Scenarios: • 1 Historical streamflow timeseries • 3 Projected streamflow timeseries Well pumping scenario? ASR scenario? Potential new storage site(s) Existing WR Infrastructure Existing WR Operations Existing Water Demands Water Rights Water Resources Model (MODSIM) Instream Flow AWS / Q relationships • Evaluation of WR Metrics under Each Alternatives: • Deliveries (shortfall amount, duration, % of time, cost) • Reservoir volumes • Hydropower Production • Streamflows Habitat Suitability Analysis
Overview of Water Planning Study Climate Change Models 3 sets of Projected Meteorological Data Historical Meteorological Data Historical Precipitation Data Water Use Assessment Water Conservation Assessment Water Storage Assessment Surface Water Model (DHSVM) Groundwater Model (MODFLOW) • Future Water Demands • Water conservation • Population change • 4 Different Scenarios: • 1 Historical streamflow timeseries • 3 Projected streamflow timeseries Well pumping scenario? ASR scenario? Potential new storage site(s) Existing WR Infrastructure Existing WR Operations Existing Water Demands Water Rights Water Resources Model (MODSIM) Instream Flow AWS / Q relationships • Evaluation of WR Metrics under Each Alternatives: • Deliveries (shortfall amount, duration, % of time, cost) • Reservoir volumes • Hydropower Production • Streamflows Habitat Suitability Analysis
Groundwater – MODFLOW model Wells used in MODFLOW model
Groundwater – MODFLOW model Increased GW pumping scenario:
Overview of Water Planning Study Climate Change Models 3 sets of Projected Meteorological Data Historical Meteorological Data Historical Precipitation Data Water Use Assessment Water Conservation Assessment Water Storage Assessment Surface Water Model (DHSVM) Groundwater Model (MODFLOW) • Future Water Demands • Water conservation • Population change • 4 Different Scenarios: • 1 Historical streamflow timeseries • 3 Projected streamflow timeseries Well pumping scenario? ASR scenario? Potential new storage site(s) Existing WR Infrastructure Existing WR Operations Existing Water Demands Water Rights Water Resources Model (MODSIM) Instream Flow AWS / Q relationships • Evaluation of WR Metrics under Each Alternatives: • Deliveries (shortfall amount, duration, % of time, cost) • Reservoir volumes • Hydropower Production • Streamflows Habitat Suitability Analysis
Water Resource Modeling - Summary 1. Potable and irrigation have higher priority water right than instream, therefore: -small/limited potable and irrigation water shortages -significant decreases in summer instream streamflow 2. Winter streamflows higher in future, not impacted by Water Resource alternatives. 3. Summer streamflows lower in future. Consumptive use magnifies natural decreases. 4. Higher winter reservoirs, lower summer reservoir levels. 5. Output from Water Resource model used in IFIM study.
Water Resource Modeling - Results Different climate scenario Different WR alternative
Overview of Water Planning Study Climate Change Models 3 sets of Projected Meteorological Data Historical Meteorological Data Historical Precipitation Data Water Use Assessment Water Conservation Assessment Water Storage Assessment Surface Water Model (DHSVM) Groundwater Model (MODFLOW) • Future Water Demands • Water conservation • Population change • 4 Different Scenarios: • 1 Historical streamflow timeseries • 3 Projected streamflow timeseries Well pumping scenario? ASR scenario? Potential new storage site(s) Existing WR Infrastructure Existing WR Operations Existing Water Demands Water Rights Water Resources Model (MODSIM) Instream Flow AWS / Q relationships • Evaluation of WR Metrics under Each Alternatives: • Deliveries (shortfall amount, duration, % of time, cost) • Reservoir volumes • Hydropower Production • Streamflows Habitat Suitability Analysis
Instream Flow Assessment • IFIM study of 5 reaches: • Neal Creek • East Fork (upper) • East Fork (lower) • Green Point • West Fork • Species of concern: • Chinook • Coho • Steelhead • Bull trout
Upper East Fork Chinook AWS
Climate/demand/conservation/storage Climate/demand/conservation Climate only Historical Climate/demands