1 / 50

Enlisted Community Review

Enlisted Community Review. Updated 1000 27 Sep 2005. Table of Contents. What Seabee’s do Active Manpower Personnel Billet Analysis IA Functional Review SELRES Recommendations. No FTS for Seabees. Rating Scope – Seabees . Builder (BU) – carpenters, masons, woodworkers

ciel
Download Presentation

Enlisted Community Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Enlisted Community Review Updated 1000 27 Sep 2005

  2. Table of Contents • What Seabee’s do • Active • Manpower • Personnel • Billet Analysis • IA • Functional Review • SELRES • Recommendations No FTS for Seabees

  3. Rating Scope – Seabees • Builder (BU) – carpenters, masons, woodworkers • Construction Electrician (CE) - electrical • Construction Mechanic (CM) – mechanics for automotive and construction equipment • Engineering Aide (EA) – surveyors, draftsmen, P&E • Equipment Operator (EO) – operate automotive and construction equipment • Steelworkers (SW) – fabricate and erect pre-engineered structures • Utilitiesman (UT) – plumbing, heating, compressed air, fuel storage, ACR, water treatment, septic All Ratings perform tasks related to contingency ops and disaster preparedness. Seabees represent a large Navy contribution to the GWOT. Source: Navy Enlisted Occupational Standards Manual

  4. Seabee Rating Compression E3-E8E9 (E8 BA) 67 8 92 17 25 46 21 28 55 27 (E9 BA) 23 15 17 BU EA SW CE UT CM EO CU UC EQ Each grouping of ratings has 3 - 4 E8 billets feeding each E9 billet CN (Students only)

  5. Active

  6. Seabee Paygrade Structures Aug 05 Force Structure Billets Aug 05 Force Structure Inventory Sea Inv/BA Current Manning: Total – 93.4% Sea – 104.0% Shore – 96.9% IA -- 46.4% Total Billets: 9634 Total Inventory: 9002 $566M/year requirement ($3.7B FYDP) 73% 135% 96% 106% 106% 107% 98% Total Sea Billets: 5367 Total Sea Inventory: 5583 Total Shore Inventory: 2759 Total Shore Billets: 2846 IA Inventory: 660 IA Billets: 1421 Source: Ministats Source: Ministats

  7. Seabee vs. Navy Paygrade Structures Seabee Aug 05 Force Structure Billets Navywide FY05 Force Structure Billets Total Sea Billets: 5367 Total Shore Billets: 2846 Total Sea Billets: 157351 Total Shore Billets: 109262 Top 2: 2.9% Top 3: 10.1% FS only Top 2: 3.8% Top 3: 12.8% FS only IA Billets – 1421 IA Billets - 37913 Source: Ministats Source: Ministats

  8. Seabee vs. NavywideSea Shore Billet Ratio Current Seabee Sea/Shore Tour Lengths: E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 E8 E9 Sea 54 54 48 36 36 36 36 Shore 24 36 36 36 36 36 36 Despite widely varying sea/shore billet ratios, Seabee sea and shore tour lengths are standardized across all ratings.

  9. Seabee Recruiting and Retention Reenlistment Rates – Zone A/B/C near Navy average ZoneFY04FY05FY05 RangeFY05 GoalFY05 Navy Avg. A 50.3% 54.5% 50.2 – 69.2% 54% 54.2% B 71.1% 70.0% 58.6 -- 84.6% 70% 67.0% C 85.9% 84.6% 77.1 – 100% 85% 84.4% Attrition Rates – At or below Navy avg. ZoneFY04FY05FY05 RangeFY05 Navy Avg. A 6.8% 7.1% 5.1 – 8.7% 9.6% B 3.5% 4.5% 2.9 – 7.1% 4.6% C 1.8% 1.6% 0.9 – 4.0% 1.4% Recruiting – Under accessing FY03FY04FY05 (YTD)FY06 Goal 860 988 1160 (1071) 1145 Shipped 749 903 (965) Success 87% 91% (90%) CREO Policy: BU – 2/3/3 CE – 1/3/3 CM – 1/3/3 EA – 3/3/3 EO – 2/3/2 SW – 3/3/3 UT – 2/3/3 Striker policy (all ratings): “A” school required

  10. SeaBee Pays SRB – significant increase in Feb 05: SDAP – new pay for E9s at NMCBs $75 5932 Basic UCT (Diver) $150 5931 Adv UCT (Diver) $450 CBLC Seabee Line Comp Chiefs EB - $1K for BU, EO, UT (FY05) Sea Pay – none! AIP - $750 max for E9s at NMCBs (starting May 05) Green equals increase, red decrease

  11. Advancements Seabee vs. Navy Average • Seabee advancements appear to be driven less by the shape of the billet pyramid than other ratings. For example: • Rating Ratio E7:E8 billets E8 Advance Opp. • BU 3.11 : 1 24.2% • CE 3.13 : 1 21.5% • SW 3.61 : 1 4.7% • EA 4.00 : 1 0.0% • E9 advancements appear to be driven less by the shape of the billet pyramid than by the number of vacancies each year.

  12. Seabee LOS Diagram • Delta caused by: • FY03-FY05 underaccessions • excess EPA for CN (a E3 student-only EMC) • In the aggregate, Seabee LOS Inventory better than previously reviewed ratings. • No excess of LOS 18-20 inventory. • Modest number of E-6s approaching HYT.

  13. Where Seabee Billets Are – Sea (FY08) (397) (116) (120) (254) (4050) (354) - Includes 139 Type 3 billets (Bahrain, DGAR, Souda Bay) - No longer included as sea billets are: - 262 Type 6 duty billets that were Type 3 - 91 Type 3 duty that are planned for transition to Type 6 Total Sea Billets: 5291 Source: TFMMS – FY08

  14. Where Seabee Billets are – Shore (by function) (496) (856) (209) • Recruiter 68 • RDC 8 • 20 • DAPA 11 • Self Help 11 • Brig 29 • Other 55 • 209 (61) (88) (600) (289) (242) Total Shore Billets - 2841 Source: TFMMS – FY08

  15. Where Seabee billets are – Shore (by BSO) (122) (56) (870) (66) (105) (113) (689) (254) (566) Resource Sponsors: N4 1985 N61 79 N00T 254 N76 74 N75 198 N1J 33 N1 107 N76 25 Other 86 Most BUPERS billets are FAC G Total Shore Billets - 2841 Source: TFMMS – FY08

  16. Seabee Fleet Concentration Areas FCASea BilletsShore Billets in-rateFAC G Pt Hueneme 2079 331 15 Gulfport 2036 277 5 Norfolk 419 279 18 San Diego 349 289 27 Washington DC 120 82 1 Sigonella 7 154 16 * Type 3 (Bahrain/DGAR/Souda) 139 0 0 Other FCAs 86 419 22 * Non-FCAs 56801105* Total 5291 2632+209 = 2841 * Significantly excess to rotational needs in that homeport Insufficient shore duty in these FCAs Large number of FAC G shore billets outside FCAs Source: TFMMS – FY08

  17. Shore Billet Analysis Criteria • Sea Shore Rotation minimum requirements • 5 years sea/3 years shore, 4/3, 4/3, 3/3, 2/2 • Career Progression • Billet pyramid requirements • Billets necessary to develop military skills • IGCA Coding (Military Essential) – next slide • Flt Concentration Areas/Homebasing • Billet Titles • Billet Funding (OSD, Joint, NWCF) • 202 non-navy funded billets for Seabee Plus 72 facilities billets at Thurmont, MD 7.3% of shore billets Functional requirement for billets not questioned

  18. Inherently Governmental-Commercial Activity (IG-CA) Coding • Eleven ratings completed: 3,435 enlisted billets, previously coded as “required” by N1, are no longer military essential Assigned by CNP / N1 Assigned by Claimant Military Essential A: Military Operations I: Military Augmentation (Backfill) Military Essential F: Military Unique Knowledge & Skills Exempt from Review D: Mobilization (Dual Status) G: Esprit de Corps & Military Support L: Law, Exec Order, Treaty M: DoD Management Decision Exempt from Review B: Military Support to Operations J: Military Rotation K: Military Career Progression Subject to Competition R: Subject to Review (CIVSUB/A-76 Competition/Elimination) Excess military billets should be phased-out , and recruiting/training/PCS dollars reinvested

  19. Seabee FY08 Shore Billet CA Reason Codes • 49% of shore billets are coded for military requirements (A, B, F, etc.) or Career Progression (K) • 23% are coded for military rotation (J) • 7% are general purpose billets (FAC G/K) • 20% are candidates for review/civsub (R or E)

  20. Minimum Shore Billet Requirements – BU only Total Potential Billet Candidates: 740 (shore billets) - 540 (min for SSR) 200(potential excess) BU needs more E5 shore billets than are available! FY08 Shore Billets: 740 Minimum Shore Billets Required to support SSR: 540

  21. Seabee Rating Sea/Shore Billet Ratios vary widely • CM, EO, SW are sea intensive • No E5-E8 shore billets to spare • Even some E4 shore billets required for SSR • BU is more balanced • But has an excess of shore billets at E6-E8 • CE, EA, UT are shore intensive • Excess shore billets at E5-E7 (but not E8) • Compressed ratings: only CU has an excess of E9 shore billets (in theory)

  22. Seabee Questionable CA Reason Codes • Claimant CA coding is generally consistent and reasonable • 7 “F” coded billets are questionable military unique skills • 6 facility maintenance billets at Bay St. Louis • 1 self-help billet at NAS Pax River • One RDC billet coded as “J” vice “F” • Five billets at 20th SRG coded as “B”, remainder as E/F/J/R • Billet coding for these billets will be reviewed in the FY05 IG&CA inventory Billet by billet review of CA Reason Codes is a benefit of each ECR

  23. Final Proposed Seabee Shore Billet Coding 37 candidates for ‘R’ coding Represents 18% of Seabee shore billets and 6.4% of total Seabee sea and shore billets

  24. Seabee FAC G Billets Required for Rotation 128 • Retain within current rating • Includes 20 E4-E5 9545 billets that will transfer to MA Available for transfer 44 • 36 E5-E6, 8 E7-E8 billets • RDC, Recruiter, Brig, CAAC, etc. Candidates for CA “R” 37 • 29 E4-E5, 8 E6-E7 billets • Hazmat, Self-Help, MWR, etc. • Most already coded as “R” • Can also be transferred to other Seabee Ratings Total209

  25. Summary of Proposed Seabee IGCA J / R Coding • Shore Intensive Ratings: • CE: recode some E6/E7/E8 billets from ‘J’ to ‘R’ • EA: recode some E5/E6/E8 billets from ‘J’ to ‘R’ • UT: recode some E7/E8 billets from ‘J’ to ‘R’ • Sea Intensive Ratings: • CM: recode all E5/E6/E7 billets from ‘R’ to ‘J’ • EO: same • SW: same, plus E8 billets • Balanced Rating: • BU: recode some E5/E6/E7 billets from ‘R’ to ‘J’, but E8 billets from ‘J’ to ‘R’ These 3 ratings also need to retain a portion of E4 shore billets to support SSR

  26. Seabee Paygrade StructuresCurrent and Proposed billet structure Force Structure Billets Current FY08 plan Force Structure Billets Proposed FY09 Total Billets: 9414 Total Billets: 8845 Total Sea Billets: 5291 Total Shore Billets: 2841 IA Billets: 1282 Total Sea Billets: 5291 Total Shore Billets: 2319 IA Billets: 1235 Top 6 - 83.0% Top 2 - 2.9% Top 6 - 82.4% Top 2 - 2.8% Source: TFMMS Source: TFMMS

  27. Seabee Student Execution FY04 Avg Student Inv: 252 FY04 Student EPA: 837 FY05 Student EPA: 838 FY07 Student EPA: 772 Total Seabee Student Avg. Execution – 30%

  28. Seabee TPPH Execution FY04 Avg TPPH Inv: 354 FY04 TPPH EPA: 219 FY05 TPPH EPA: 238 Seabee TPPH Avg. Execution – 162% MA IA imbalance may grow even larger as MA EPA continues to increase

  29. M600 Student EMC • The purpose of EMC M600 should be to account for undesignated Seabees in RTC or “A” School • However, billets in the M600 EMC do not fully account for “A” school students • Even worse, an improper EMC logic results in the EMF accounting for only a few Seabee students • As a result, latest ministats shows only 15 inventory in an EMC with 347 billets • Trainee Working Group is working to correct this issue.

  30. E9 Sea Manning Challenge

  31. E9 Sea/Shore ManningCU Rating • Sea manning trending steadily downward; shore steady Sea manning 25 - 88% May 05 $750 AIP Jun 05 $450 SDAP Sea manning 110-150% Inventory Sea – 7 Shore - 20 Sea and shore tour lengths steady at 36/36 during the entire period

  32. E9 Sea/Shore ManningEQ Rating • Sea manning trending steadily downward; shore steady Sea manning 33 - 67% Sea manning 80-110% Inventory Sea – 4 Shore - 12 Sea and shore tour lengths steady at 36/36 during the entire period

  33. E9 Sea/Shore ManningUC Rating • Sea manning trending downward, with brief up tick; shore declining 100% ! Sea manning 75-100% Sea manning 44 - 100% Inventory Sea – 6 Shore - 7 Sea and shore tour lengths steady at 36/36 during the entire period

  34. Seabee Retirement Trends As of 6 Jul 05 Will receive more FRRAs FY 06

  35. E9 Sea Manning vs. E9 Sea/Shore Billet Ratio E9 Sea Manning There is an (imperfect) correlation between E9 sea manning and E9 sea/shore billet ratios CU E9 sea manning is well below the E9 manning trend line E9 SSR Source: Aug 05 Ministats

  36. E9 Seabee Billet Review • CUCM is very shore intensive, while EQ, UC are not • However, 4 E8 billets feed into each CUCM billet, but only about 3 E8 billets feed into EQ/UC • Accordingly, recommend against transferring billets from CUCM to the other two ratings • E9 IA EPA matches 12 month execution avg. means no change required • Bottom line – no obvious billet adjustments to fix E9 sea manning

  37. Summary of Active Duty Seabee Findings • Community is currently manned at 93% overall and 104% at sea. • E9 manned at 73% at sea and 122% ashore. • Ratings vary from sea intensive (CM, EO, SW) to shore intensive (CE, EA, UT). • FAC G billets can be reassigned within Seabee ratings to help balance sea shore billet ratio. • Relatively poor homebasing opportunity between sea and shore. • 78% of sea billets in Pt. Hueneme/Gulfport, but only 22% of shore billets • 474 shore billets identified as candidates for civilianization. • IA EPA severely out of balance, particularly for Students.

  38. SELRES

  39. Seabee Paygrade StructuresSELRES FY05 Force Structure Billets Aug 05 Force Structure Inventory Total Billets - 10039 Total Inventory - 7731 Assigned to Billets: 7083 Assigned to IAP: 648 (8.4%) Current Manning: Total – 77.0% IA Billets - 0 IA Inventory – 0

  40. Seabee SELRES Comments • 55% of Seabee force structure billets are SELRES • SELRES are assigned to twelve NMCBs, two Naval Const Regts, CBMUs, two Supply Support BNs, NAVSPECWAR OPSUP Tms, Naval Const Force Support Unit, PHIB CB, BMU, EODMU, 18 MIUWUs, etc. • BA will drop from 10039 in FY05 to 8718 in FY08 due to Reserve ZBR cuts • Chronic reserve Seabee vacancies drove the decision to cut billets to more executable levels

  41. Recommendations

  42. Seabee Recommendations • Review 437 in-rate and 37 FAC G billets as candidates for civilianization (mostly in CE, EA, UT ratings). • Transfer 44 FAC G billets to other Seabee ratings in need of shore billets. • Adjust Seabee IA billet allocation to reflect execution as part of a navywide IA billet review. • Correct M600 EMC billet/inventory allocation • Continue steps to improve E9 sea manning. • Change sea/shore tour lengths to 36/30 • Monitor affects of SDAP and AIP increases

  43. Estimated Seabee Manpower Costs and Savings • The Seabee community is a ~$3.9B enterprise • Estimated grossMPN savings if 474 excess Seabee shore billets are civilianized: No FTS MPN Comp Rates EDW Net savings of $28.9M across the FYDP (assumes 20% savings (100% IA))

  44. Seabee Skills Functional Review • HRCAT tool predicts that total costs for military are generally higher than GS, but less than contractors:

  45. Proposed PR-07 Billet Changes Affecting Seabee Ratings • Added sea billets for MK V SOC Dets (4 billets), EODGRU Mobile Comm Dets (2), Inshore Boat Units (6), and SOC GMV Maint Personnel (37). • Added shore billets for NAS Keflavik (30) and NAVSUPPFAC Thurmont (7). • Reduced shore billets due to CNI and NETWARCOM cuts, recruiting and NETC cuts, and 1NCD reductions. • Net reduction in Seabee endstrength:

  46. ECR Schedule • Completed ECRs (10): MR, HT, YN(SW), YN(SS), AS, ET(SW), QM, DK/PN, MM(SW), MN • ECRs in progress (3): AT, IT, Seabee • Future ECR candidates: JO/PH/LI/DM, AB, MA, TM,

  47. Back-up

  48. Construction Industry Trends Construction Industry Hourly Earnings Construction Industry Unemployment Rate

  49. Enlisted Community Reviews • “Vertical” look at individual enlisted communities • Focus first on manpower requirements (billet base) • Sea / Shore rotation; Career Progression; Home-basing • Challenge military essentiality • Review how rating’s function is delivered across Navy • Review community management issues • Advancement Opportunity; Retention; Accessions • Individuals Account; Special Pays & Bonuses • Develop actionable recommendations for N1 decision to deliver manpower savings • Time-phase changes over FYDP as required to support executability Provide the Community Sponsor recommendations for their Human Capital Strategy

  50. Community Review Process • Establish initial working relationship with selected community sponsors and managers • Vision, background, data, core competencies, career paths, etc. • Review TFMMS Billet Base • Military essentiality & IGCA coding consistency across claimancies • Identify target billets for review • Review Personnel Inventories • Alignment of strength to authorizations • Assess Influencing and Executability Factors • Law, policy, costs, career expectations, community management issues • Develop Alternatives & Recommendations • Actionable and executable….Total Force & Human Capital perspective… • Conduct Decision Briefing • Sponsor/claimants submit program adjustments

More Related