1 / 7

CDM ACCREDITATION PROCEDURE AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT

CDM ACCREDITATION PROCEDURE AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT 1st Sustainable Development Mechanism Joint Coordination Workshop 24-25 March 2012 Laura Severino. ACCREDITATION.

ciro
Download Presentation

CDM ACCREDITATION PROCEDURE AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CDM ACCREDITATION PROCEDUREAREAS OF IMPROVEMENT 1st Sustainable Development Mechanism Joint Coordination Workshop 24-25 March 2012 Laura Severino

  2. ACCREDITATION • It is a procedure by which an authoritative body gives formal recognition that a body or person (DOE) is competent to carry out specific tasks; • Accreditation is an international recognition that provides assurance to the public.

  3. ACCREDITATIONPROCEDURE STANDARD Theaccreditation The performance The regular on-site ACTORS The re-accreditation CMP The spot-check CDM-EB The policy framework CDM-AP CDM-AT SECRETARIAT

  4. ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT • Document/Desk review by a CDM-AT of the adequacy of the documented system; • On-site assessment by a CDM-AT to evaluate the implementation of the system; • Observation of the verification assessment carried out by the DOE’s team at the project site and evaluating conformity of the DOE’s draft report that is based only on the documentary evidence; • Continuous monitoring of the performance of the DOE in conducting validation and verification activities.

  5. STRENGHTS • The accreditation process contributes significantly to support DOE in improving the quality and performance; • The thresholds can be seen as scores which indicated the performance and the extent of compliance with a standard; • Accreditation provides an opportunity and incentive for self-improvement; • The system is very transparent; • The output of the DOE performance monitoring can provide appropriate inputs into future revisions of the CDM requirements, standards, and methodologies.

  6. WEAKNESS, AREAS OF IMPROVEMENTS • The system is complex and time consuming; • Instead the recent improvements of the accreditation procedure, projects are checked at 100%; • Still focused on control rather than quality enhancement; • Sometimes the DOE have experienced difficulties in implementing Corrective actions for the Non Conformities identified by the CDM-AT; • Many checks from different bodies/entity on the same project can generate inhomogeneity of judgment.

  7. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND YOUR ATTENTION Laura SEVERINO RINA Services S.p.A.Climate Change & EnvironmentVia Corsica, 12 - 16128 Genova - ITALYPhone: +39 010 5385509Mobile: +39 335 7520223Fax: +39 010 5351895http://www.rina.org

More Related