190 likes | 368 Views
The Joint Commission Center for Transforming Healthcare (CTH) Surgical Site Infections in Colorectal Surgeries Project: 2012 Sasha Madison, MPH, CIC Director Infection Prevention & Control Dept. May 14, 2014.
E N D
The Joint Commission Center for Transforming Healthcare (CTH) Surgical Site Infections in Colorectal Surgeries Project: 2012 Sasha Madison, MPH, CIC Director Infection Prevention & Control Dept. May 14, 2014
Collaborate with American College of Surgeons & NSQIP measurement system leveraged. • Seven participating hospitals: • Mayo Clinic, MN • Cleveland Clinic, OH • Stanford Hospital & Clinics, CA • OSF Saint Francis, IL • Northwestern Memorial Hospital, IL • North Shore LIJ, NY • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, CA Project #4: Surgical Site Infection
Systematic Approach to Problem Solving – Surgical Site Infections (1) • The Center worked with the American College of Surgeons to determine the scope of the SSI project, since there is a wide range of surgeries and procedures that can develop SSIs – each with its own unique set of complications and challenges. • To help narrow the scope of the project, the following criteria were used to identify a specific procedure that: • Is common across different types of hospitals • Has significant complications with an adverse clinical impact • Hospitals have significant opportunities to improve performance • Has high variability in performance across hospitals
Collaborative Project Definition DMAIC Problem Statement: • The incidence of Surgical Site Infections in colorectal surgery is high, variable, and represents opportunity for improvement. Goal: • Reduce colorectal surgical site infections by 50% (Observed and Observed/Expected) Scope: • Process Begins: Pre-Operative Processes (Pre-Op Clinic with Surgeon) • Process Ends: 30 Days Post-Surgery • Includes:All emergent & elective surgical procedures • Excludes: Trauma and Transplant patients & Patients under 18 years of age Timeline: August 2010 – March 2012
2009 Metrics:Observed & O/E Baseline Performance DMAIC Metric 1- Observed Colorectal SSIs Baseline: 18.5% Target: 9.3% (50% reduction) Metric 2- O/E* Ratio for Colorectal SSIs Baseline: 1.49 Target: 0.74 (50% reduction) Average SSI Cases / Month = 3 Note: Observed/Expected / Index Value Expected Value is Dependent on “Expected” influence/calculation
DMAIC SHC SSI Project Phases & Elements Note: Above variables found to be statistically significant, however not entirely modifiable. - No Interventions Made
DMAIC NHSN Publicly Reported Cases- MIDAS Focus Study • MIDAS Focus Objectives: • Detailed abstraction of elements with identified areas of opportunity • Data will be analyzed for any potential trends and to serve as a guide for further interventions • Surgeon specific SSI rates • Surgical Quality Council Dashboard will include SSI outcomes
Antibiotic Stewardship Program DMAIC • Dosing of Ertapenem for patients with BMI greater than 30 • Assessment of empiric therapy recommendations for contaminated and dirty cases • Measuring timing of prophylactic antibiotics prior to incision: • 0-15 minutes • 16-30 “ ” • 31-45 “ ” • 46-60 “ ”
Improvement ‘Bundle’ • Interventions across the episode of care • Multi-disciplinary • Engage staff, patient, and families • Standardize as many processes as possible • Ensure high compliance with elements • Quick audits • Build the elements into the system • Frequent feedback and communication
Pre-operative Interventions • Pre-operative Chlorhexidine packets • Provided to all patients preoperatively with instructions • Use monitored morning of admission • If not reported as not being used, SAGE wipes used on the entire body • Patients with BMI > 30 (Mayo) • SAGE wipes applied even if preoperative bath performed • Procedure listing software automatically identifies patients with BMI > 30 • Pre-op antibiotic ordering (Mayo) • Procedure scheduling software automatically provides SCIP appropriate choices • Weight-based dosing • Software automatically orders intra-operative re-dosing dose if historical data for the specific procedure and surgeon demonstrated an average case duration >3 hours
Pre-Operative Interventions (cont’d) • Hair removal by electric clipper • Outside of the operating room • Standardized to Chlorhexidine-Alcohol (Chloraprep™) skin preparation for all abdominal cases • Surgical assistant applies skin preparation • All in-serviced on appropriate application • Must dry for 3 minutes before drapes applied
Intra-Operative Interventions • Pre-procedural pause includes confirming appropriate antibiotics administered and documented • Re-dosing of cefazolin for cases longer than 3 hours. (Mayo) • Circulating nurse has the preop order and pulls medication at the beginning of the case • Reminder window on anesthesia provider’s computer screen Triggered off time of first dose administration • Appropriate weight-based dosing
Intra-Operative Interventions (cont’d) • “Closing” Process • At the time of fascia closure • All staff change gloves • Gowns if soiled • Field re-blocked with sterile towels • Instruments used during case removed and “closing tray” brought onto the field
Post-Operative Interventions • All order-sets discontinue SCIP compliant antibiotics after two postop doses or single dose when appropriate (Mayo) • Pharmacist part of team and queries service • Hand hygiene essential on floor • Physician/Nursing initiative • Patient and Family initiative • Sterile dressing on until morning of POD 2 • Document removal • Chlorhexidine shower/wipes daily after dressing removal (Mayo) • Standard postop order-sets orders urinary catheter removal at 8am the morning after surgery (Mayo) • Dismiss with chlorhexidine soap bottle for use at home (Mayo)
Important Lessons: • Multidisciplinary approach is essential • Physicians, nursing (pre, intrao-p, floor), pharmacy, CST, SA, administration, supply chain, quality, S&P, IT, Patient Education, Infection Control, WOCN, NSQIP team • Address the entire surgical episode of care • Pre, intra, and postoperative elements may influence SSI rates • Interventions designed for each phase • Introduce elements of change and audit compliance • Build ‘clues’ into the process to ensure better compliance: convenient hand hygiene supplies (Purell wipes, Hibiclens bottles), signage, Hibiclens packets, etc. • Build process improvements into the system to ensure task completion • No evidence for which of element(s) makes a difference in the “bundle”: the outcome is all that matters
Challenges Encountered DMAIC Learnings: • Reduction of our SSI rates continue to be challenging. Questions 2012: • Could we learn more by studying the elements of the National Healthcare Safety Network(NHSN) colorectal SSI cases? • Could we focus our efforts on the ‘bulk’ of our infections; Organ Space (asked in 2012) • Focused our efforts on organ space infections beginning after this collaborative – later part of 2102 • Decrease seen in 2013 (decrease seen in colo-rectal SIR) • Found part of the issue was appropriate classification of cases: major educational focus later part 2012/2013 Experienced & Foreseeable Challenges: • Strategies for preventing infections are different based on culture, environment, surgeon practice, patient pre-existing conditions • Lag time in collection and receipt of data to assess improvements • Nursing time for documentation of audits takes away from patient care • Insufficient and incomplete audits • Resources needed for this improvement project Best Practice: • Standardization of approach was sequential and we may not see full term change yet (glove changing, closing trays, etc. occurred in sequence not parallel) • Best practices identified elsewhere may not have same level of impact in our organization
Next Steps & Opportunities DMAIC • Based on best practice learnings through collaborative, continue glove changes & separate/clean closing instruments • MIDAS Focus Study on Publicly Reported Cases • Infection Control SSI surveillance in July/Aug 2011 identified an opportunity in colorectal surgery • Data collection focused on elements which are not captured elsewhere • Need for individual physician communication of infections identified • Opportunity for Physician review of case with abstracted data elements • Antibiotic Stewardship • Instituted February 2012 • Review of current prophylaxis guidelines and empiric therapy • SSIDeep/Organ Space and Sepsis commonalities • Drill down on each Organ/Space and Deep SSI • Leaks (i.e. CT scans, physician documentation, abscessogram results) • Antibiotic prophylaxis dosing for patients with BMI greater than 30 • Empiric therapy and treatment protocols • Pursue Pre-Operative Warming Improvements • Preoperative strategies for surgery admission unit • Potential partnership with vendors to pilot new interventions