1 / 24

Mark Lancaster University of Manchester / UCL

Explore the realm of Electroweak Precision Measurements with future prospects, theory uncertainties, new colliders, and impactful BSM effects. Learn about the significance of Higgs self-coupling, theory uncertainties reduction, and the potential to probe beyond the Standard Model.

cjust
Download Presentation

Mark Lancaster University of Manchester / UCL

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Future Electroweak Precision Measurements Mark Lancaster University of Manchester / UCL

  2. Motivation: Fertile Ground TREE LEVEL SM Rad. Corr LOOP LEVEL SM ~ 500 MeV. Requires 0.5% precision to probe TREE LEVEL Mw Mark Lancaster | Electroweak Precision Measurements

  3. Mw measurements now probing at O(10 MeV) Mark Lancaster | Electroweak Precision Measurements

  4. Harbinger of new interactions B oscillations and loop corrections to Z mass Mark Lancaster | Electroweak Precision Measurements

  5. Higgs Mass from fits to EWK data Tevatron mT LEP mW Tevatron mW Significant improvements in mW at Tevatron Mark Lancaster | Electroweak Precision Measurements

  6. Just prior to Higgs Discovery… Mark Lancaster | Electroweak Precision Measurements

  7. In the Higgs Era Motivation Remains… Limits placed on Higgs couplings and TGCs are also determined by how well the EWKPO are known Dark : perfect EWKPO Light : measured EWKPO Jorge De Blas : arXiv:1803.00939, 1611.05354, 1905.03764 Mark Lancaster | Electroweak Precision Measurements

  8. Higgs Self Coupling from Precision EWK arXiv:1702.07678 Mark Lancaster | Electroweak Precision Measurements

  9. Higgs Self Coupling from precision EWK arXiv:1702.10737 Mark Lancaster | Electroweak Precision Measurements

  10. Programme of measurements All future ee-colliders have dedicated running periods precision EWK measurements: mW, mZ, mTOPin addition to direct Higgs/BSM running Mark Lancaster | Electroweak Precision Measurements

  11. Theory Uncertainties At LEP theory uncertainty was 20% of the experimental uncertainty but with x 4-20 improvement in experimental precision requires Z-pole and WW calculations with one or more additional orders in the calculation in both QCD & EWK  NNNLO See Stefan’s talk Mark Lancaster | Electroweak Precision Measurements

  12. And also precise values of 𝜶EM & 𝜶S So need ⧍MW < 5 MeV measurement for this to be potentially sensitive to BSM Z-data can significantly reduce 𝛼S and 𝛼EM uncertainties e.g. by xO(5) at FCC. Mark Lancaster | Electroweak Precision Measurements

  13. 𝜶S and 𝜶EM Improvement AFB(𝜇𝜇) above and below Z-pole arXiv:1703.01626 See David d'Enterria’s talk in QCD session Mark Lancaster | Electroweak Precision Measurements

  14. Impact of BSM Effects O (10) MeV SM with LHC mH Mark Lancaster | Electroweak Precision Measurements

  15. New colliders at MZ and 2MW (and 2MTOP) Z W (WW) Mark Lancaster | Electroweak Precision Measurements

  16. Precision EWK Observables Submission Inputs: 29, 145, 101, 132, 135 LHeC can measure sin2𝜃W as f(E). LHeC : Mw to 10 MeV but can measure PDFs allowing HL-LHC to half PDF uncertainty and achieve O(5 MeV) Mw. ILC/CLIC : Mw to 5 MeV similar to HL-LHC/TeV average. Mark Lancaster | Electroweak Precision Measurements

  17. Systematics • beam energy and energy spread determination • ISR • luminosity • Beam energy dominates: use LEP resonance depolarizing • method (0.1 MeV). • At FCC and CEPC will use non-colliding (pilot) bunches concurrently • to avoid need to extrapolate between measuring periods with • expected uncertainty 0.1 – 0.4 MeV. Mark Lancaster | Electroweak Precision Measurements

  18. Top Mass Threshold scans give well-defined mTOP Current uncertainty ~ 400 MeV from Tevatron/LHC CLIC/FCC/ILC all expected to achieve: 15-20 MeV statistical 10-20 MeV systematic But presently uncertainty from theory is larger: 30 MeV (𝛼S), 40 MeV (HO). This will be reduced by the measurements at Z-pole. O (25) MeV Mark Lancaster | Electroweak Precision Measurements

  19. Characterise Improvements via Oblique Parameters S & T determined much better for experiments at Mz (FCC, CEPC) but W & Y much better at CLIC that has highest energy range 0.1 has sensitivity to Higgs TGC x20 SM Mark Lancaster | Electroweak Precision Measurements

  20. The power of polarisation (ILC/CLIC) CLIC: unpolarised CLIC: polarised Mark Lancaster | Electroweak Precision Measurements

  21. Sterile neutrinos at Z-pole Mark Lancaster | Electroweak Precision Measurements

  22. sin2𝜽W @ DUNE Submission:31 DUNE DUNE: 0.35% precision could clarify the NuTeV 3𝜎 discrepancy wrt. SM. Mark Lancaster | Electroweak Precision Measurements

  23. Submission:118 𝜶EM @ MuonE a𝜇HVP(SM) = (693 ± 2.5) x 10-10 : frome+e- hadrons annihilation data Exp discrepancy wrt. to SM : 27 x 10-10 Aim to directly measure a𝜇HVP(SM) in t-channel e𝜇 scattering to same precision as e+e- data. Measure differential 𝜎 as function of t : running of 𝛼EM(t) Also needs 0.01% theory & so NNLO QED calculations e+ e- e- e- 𝜇 𝜇 Mark Lancaster | Electroweak Precision Measurements

  24. Summary Colliders at Mw, 2Mw and 2MTOP will improve precision of EWK precision observables by factors of 5-20. 2 orders of magnitude improvement in S & T (FCC) and first significant probes of W & Y (CLIC). This enters the regime where rad. corrections from BSM can be probed accurately and tests the SM at beyond 2-loop. EWK observables can also be used together with direct Higgs measurements to improve Higgs self-coupling determinations To benefit from this improved experimental precision requires commensurate improvements in theory. Mark Lancaster | Electroweak Precision Measurements

More Related