1 / 72

Adhoc Networks Routing Tutorial - Part I -

Adhoc Networks Routing Tutorial - Part I -. Internet Computing Laboratory @ KUT ( http://icl.kut.ac.kr ) Youn-Hee Han. It is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Adhoc Routing Protocol 101. Layer 2 Routing (1).

clark-benjamin
Download Presentation

Adhoc Networks Routing Tutorial - Part I -

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Adhoc Networks Routing Tutorial- Part I - Internet Computing Laboratory @ KUT (http://icl.kut.ac.kr) Youn-Hee Han It is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License

  2. Adhoc Routing Protocol 101 Computer Network

  3. Layer 2 Routing (1) • The source determines that the destination interface is in the same IP subnet • This necessarily implies that the source and destination are directly connected by a Layer 2 network • ARP allows the source to determine the Layer 2 (MAC) address of the destination • The source encapsulates the IP datagram in a Layer 2 frame, addresses the frame appropriately, and transmits the frame • Layer 2 “interworking units” (e.g., Ethernet bridges, 802.11 APs) may need to perform some forwarding or routing functions Computer Network

  4. Layer 2 Routing (2) Dest IP = 10.0.1.9 (Dest Net = 10.0.1.X) Local IP: 10.0.1.4 Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.0 Local Network: 10.0.1.X Src ARP Request for 10.0.1.9 ARP Reply IP MAC AP 10.0.1.9 Dest … … Local IP: 10.0.1.9 Dest Computer Network

  5. Layer 2 Routing (3) Dest IP = 10.0.1.9 (Dest Net = 10.0.1.X) Local IP: 10.0.1.4 Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.0 Local Network: 10.0.1.X S IP Dest = 10.0.1.9 DA = D BSSID = AP AP IP Dest = 10.0.1.9 Dest = D D Computer Network

  6. Need for Layer 3 Routing • Of course, nodes may not be connected via Layer 2 • Nodes that are in a different IP subnet, i.e., the destination IP network is different than the local IP network • Nodes that are out of radio range in an ad hoc wireless network • Layer 3, or IP, routing is needed in this case 10.0.3.6 10.4.6.9 10.0.1.1 10.4.6.1 10.0.1.3 10.0.3.3 Computer Network

  7. Routing • Routing consists of two fundamental steps • Forwarding packets to the next hop (from an input interface to an output interface in a traditional wired network) • Determining how to forward packets (building a routing table or specifying a route) • Forwarding packets is easy, but knowing where to forward packets (especially efficiently) is hard • Reach the destination • Minimize the number of hops (path length) • Minimize delay • Minimize packet loss • Minimize cost Computer Network

  8. Routing Decision Point • Source routing • Sender determines a route and specifies it in the packet header • Supported in IP, although not the typical routing scheme • Hop-by-hop (datagram) routing • A routing decision is made at each forwarding point (at each router) • Standard routing scheme for IP • Virtual circuit routing • Determine and configure a path prior to sending first packet • Used in ATM (and analogous to voice telephone system) Computer Network

  9. Routing Table • A routing table contains information to determine how to forward packets • Source routing: Routing table is used to determine route to the destination to be specified in the packet • Hop-by-hop routing: Routing table is used to determine the next hop for a given destination • Virtual circuit routing: Routing table used to determine path to configure through the network • A distributed algorithm is required to build the routing table • Distance vector algorithms • Link state algorithms Computer Network

  10. Distance Vector Algorithms (1) • “Distance” of each link in the network is a metric that is to be minimized • Each link may have “distance” 1 to minimize hop count • Algorithm attempts to minimize distance • The routing table at each node… • Specifies the next hop for each destination • Specifies the distance to that destination • Neighbors can exchange routing table information to find a route (or a better route) to a destination Computer Network

  11. Dest Dest Dest Dest Next Next Next Next Metric Metric Metric Metric B A A A B C A B 3 2 1 1 C B B C C C B B 1 1 2 2 D D C D D B C C 1 3 2 1 Distance Vector Algorithms (2) A C D B Computer Network

  12. Dest Dest Next Next Metric Metric A B A B 1 1 C B B C 1 1 D D C D 1 2 Distance Vector Algorithms (3) • Node A will learn of Node C’s shorter path to Node D and update its routing table A C D B Computer Network

  13. Link-State Algorithms (1) • Each node shares its link information so that all nodes can build a map of the full network topology • Each node periodically floods status of its links • Each node re-broadcasts link state information received from its neighbour • Link information is updated when a link changes state (goes up or down) • Link state determined by sending small “hello” packets to neighbors • Given full topology information, a node can determine the next best hop or a route from the source Computer Network

  14. Link Link Link Link A-B A-B A-B A-B B-C B-C B-C B-C C-D C-D C-D C-D Link-State Algorithms (2) • Assuming the topology is stable for a sufficiently long period, all nodes will have the same topology information A C D B Computer Network

  15. Link Link Link Link A-B A-B A-B A-B A-C A-C A-C A-C B-C B-C B-C B-C C-D C-D C-D C-D Link-State Algorithms (3) • Nodes A and C propagate the existence of link A-C to their neighbors and, eventually, to the entire network A-C A-C A C D A-C B Computer Network

  16. MANETs • A mobile ad hoc network (MANET) is characterized by… • Multi-hop routing so that nodes not directly connected at Layer 2 can communicate through Layer 3 routing • Wireless links • Mobile nodes Logical Topology S S D D Computer Network

  17. MANET vs. Traditional Routing (1) • Every node is potentially a router in a MANET, while most nodes in traditional wired networks do not route packets • Nodes transmit and receive their own packets and, also, forward packets for other nodes • Topologies are dynamic in MANETs due to mobile nodes, but are relatively static in traditional networks • Routing in MANETs must consider both Layer 3 and Layer 2 information, while traditional protocols rely on Layer 3 information only • Link layer information can indicate connectivity and interference Computer Network

  18. MANET vs. Traditional Routing (2) • MANET topologies tend to have many more redundant links than traditional networks • A MANET “router” typically has a single interface, while a traditional router has an interface for each network to which it connects • Routed packet sent forward when transmitted, but also sent to previous transmitter • Channel properties, including capacity and error rates, are relatively static in traditional networks, but may vary in MANETs Computer Network

  19. MANET vs. Traditional Routing (3) • Interference is an issue in MANETs, but not in traditional networks • For example, a forwarded packet from B-to-C competes with new packets sent from A-to-B • Channels can be asymmetric with some Layer 2 technologies • Note that the IEEE 802.11 MAC assumes symmetric channels • Power efficiency is an issue in MANETs, while it is normally not an issue in traditional networks • MANETs may have gateways to fixed network, but are typically “stub networks,” while traditional networks can be stub networks or transit networks Computer Network

  20. MANET vs. Traditional Routing (4) • There is limited physical security in a MANET compared to a traditional network • Increased possibility of eavesdropping, spoofing, and denial-of-security attacks • Traditional routing protocols for wired networks do not work well in most MANETs • MANETs are too dynamic • Wireless links present problems of interference, limited capacity, etc. Computer Network

  21. MANET Routing • Nodes must determine how to forward packets • Source routing: Routing decision is made at the sender • Hop-by-hop routing: Routing decision is made at each intermediate node • Difficult to achieve good performance • Routes change over time due to node mobility • Best to avoid long delays when first sending packets • Best to reduce overhead of route discovery and maintenance • Want to involve as many nodes as possible – to find better paths and reduce likelihood of partitions Computer Network

  22. MANET Routing Approaches • Decision time • Proactive or table-driven – maintain routing tables • Reactive or on-demand – determine routing on an as-needed basis • Network structure • Hierarchical – impose a hierarchy on a collection of nodes and reflect this hierarchy in the routing algorithm • May use a proactive protocol for routing within a cluster or zone • May use a reactive protocol for routing between distinguished “cluster heads” • Non-hierarchical – make decisions among all nodes Computer Network

  23. Types of MANET Routing Unicast-Routing Protocol for MANET Table-Driven/ Proactive Hybrid On-Demand-driven/Reactive Clusterbased/ Hierarchical Distance- Vector Link- State ZRP DSR AODV TORA LANMAR CEDAR DSDV OLSR TBRPF FSR STAR MANET: Mobile Ad hoc Network (IETF working group) Computer Network

  24. Common Features • MANET routing protocols must… • Discover a path from source to destination • Maintain that path (e.g., if an intermediate node moves and breaks the path) • Define mechanisms to exchange routing information • Proactive protocols • Find paths, in advance, for all source-pair destinations • Periodically exchange routing information to maintain paths • (-) Larger signalling traffic and power consumption. • Reactive protocols • Discover a path when a packet needs to be transmitted and no known path exists • Attempt to alter the path when a routing failure occurs • (-) A long delay for application when no route to the destination available Computer Network

  25. Basic Classifications • Proactive protocols • Maintaining route map of all nodes • Example protocols: DSDV[1], OLSR[2], FSR[3] • Reactive protocols • Adapting to the traffic pattern on a demand or need basis • Example protocols: DSR[4], AODV[5], TORA[6] • Hybrid protocols • Proactive for nearby nodes while reactive for distant nodes • Example protocols: ZRP[7] Computer Network

  26. Basic Classifications • [1] C. E. Perkins, P. Bhagwat, “Highly Dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance Vector (DSDV) for Mobile Computers”, Proc. of the SIGCOMM 1994 Conference on Communications Architectures, Protocols and Applications, Aug 1994, pp 234-244. • [2] T. Clausen, P. Jacquet “Optimized Link State Routing Protocol”, RFC 3626 • [3] M. Gerla, G. Pei, X. Hong, Ts. Chen“Fisheye State Routing Protocol (FSR) for Ad Hoc Networks”, Internet Draft, draft-ietf-manet-fsr-00.txt, work in progress, June 2001. • [4] David B. Johnson, David A. Maltz, Yih-Chun Hu, “The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (DSR)”, <draft-ietf-manet-dsr-10.txt> • [5] C. Perkins, E. Belding-Royer, S. Das, “Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing”, RFC 3561 • [6] V. Park and S. Corson, “Temporally-Ordered Routing Algorithm (TORA) Version 1 Functional Specification,” IETF I-D draft-ietf-manet-tora-spec-04.txt • [7] Nicklas Beijar, “Zone Routing Protocol (ZRP)” Computer Network

  27. Quantitative Metrics • End-to-end data throughput and delay • Route Acquisition Time (on-demand routing) • Percentage Out-of-Order Delivery • Efficiency • Control Overhead • Power consumption and network lifetime Computer Network

  28. Proactive Routing Protocols Computer Network

  29. Proactive Approach - Principle • Routing Table • Each terminal has its own routing table Computer Network

  30. Proactive Approach - Principle • Control Packet • Used to make and update the Routing Table • Broadcasted in a limited area • Format of Typical Control Packet Computer Network

  31. Proactive Approach • Example of Control Packet Exchange A B D C A A B A C A B B C C t =3 t =1 t =2 t =4 Computer Network

  32. Proactive Approach Routing Table in D G B E C To F D I A F Computer Network H

  33. Proactive Approach Routing Table in I G B E C To F D I A F Computer Network H

  34. Proactive Approach Routing Table in H G B E C To F D I A F Computer Network H

  35. Destination-Sequenced Distance Vector • Design goals: • Keep it simple! • Routes are chosen by a metric (hop count, least delay, best signal strength, etc..) • Avoid the looping problem • Tag each routing table entry with a Destination sequence number • Allow fast reaction to topology changes • Make immediate route advertisement on significant changes in routing table • Both periodic and triggered routing updates to maintain table • DSDV is Proactive • Each node maintains routing information for all known destinations • Routing information must be updated periodically • Traffic overhead even if there is no change in network topology • Maintains routes which are never used Computer Network

  36. DSDV - Table entries • Sequence number originated from destination. • Ensures loop freedom and route freshness • Format = Dest_NNN • Install Time when entry was made • used to delete stale entries from table Computer Network

  37. DSDV - Transmitting Route Information • Routing information is transmitted by broadcast • Updates are transmitted periodically or immediately when any significant topology change is available Rules to set sequence number information • On each advertisement increase own destination sequence number (use only even numbers) • If a node is no more reachable (timeout) increase sequence number of this node by 1 (odd sequence number) and set metric = . • Full dump: all information from the transmitting node • Incremental dump: all information that has changed since the last full dump Computer Network

  38. DSDV - Route Selection • Update information is compared to own routing table • 1. Select route with higher destination sequence number (This ensure to use always newest information from destination) • 2. Select the route with better metric when sequence numbers are equal. • Tables A B C Computer Network

  39. DSDV - Route Advertisement B increases Seq.Nr from 100 to 102 B broadcasts routing information to Neighbors A and C including the destination sequence numbers (A, 1, A-550) (B, 0, B-102) (C, 1, C-588) (A, 1, A-550) (B, 0, B-102) (C, 1, C-588) A B C Computer Network

  40. DSDV - New Node 1. D broadcast for first timeSend Sequence number D-000 (D, 0, D-000) A B C D 2. Insert entry for D with sequence number D-000 A B C D Computer Network

  41. DSDV - New Node 3. C increases its sequence number to C-592 then Immediately broadcasts! its new table. (A, 2, A-550) (B, 1, B-102) (C, 0, C-592) (D, 1, D-000) (A, 2, A-550) (B, 1, B-102) (C, 0, C-592) (D, 1, D-000) A B C D Computer Network

  42. DSDV - New Node 4. B gets this new information and updates its table……. D gets routing table from C and create its own table. A B C D Computer Network

  43. DSDV - no loops, no count to infinity 2. B does its broadcast-> no effect on C (C knows that B has stale information because C has higher seq. number for destination D)-> no loop! 1. Node C detects broken Link: Increase Seq. Nr. by 1(no reachable -> odd number) (D, 2, D-100) (D, 2, D-100) D A B C Loop made withoutsequence number (D, 2) (D, 2) Computer Network

  44. DSDV - Immediate Advertisement 3. Immediate propagationC to B:(update information has higher Seq. Nr.  replace table entry) 4. Immediate propagation B to A:(update information has higher Seq. Nr.  replace table entry) (D, , D-101) (D, , D-101) D A B C Computer Network

  45. DSDV - Limitation • DSDV generally requires a full dump update periodically  DSDV is not efficient in route updating • DSDV limits the number of nodes that can join the network • Topology changes are slowly propagated • Whenever topology of a network changes, DSDV is unstable until update packets propagate through the network • Table exchange eats bandwidth • DSDV is effective for creating ad-hoc networks for small populations of mobile nodes • DSDV is a fairly brute force approach, because connectivity information needs periodical update througout the whole network • DSDV can no longer find a route reliably when there is high mobility Computer Network

  46. A A 1 10 B B 0 20 A B C C 1 30 A A 0 10 D C 2 40 B B 1 20 A C 3 10 C B 2 30 B C 2 20 D B 3 40 C C 1 30 D D 0 40 A B 2 10 C D B B 1 20 C C 0 30 D D 1 40 DSDV –one more example Computer Network

  47. A A 1 12 B B 0 20 A B C C 1 32 A A 0 12 D C 2 40 B B 1 20 A C 3 10 C B 2 30 B C 2 20 D B 3 40 C C 1 32 D D 0 40 A B 2 10 C D B B 1 20 A & C perform a broadcast C C 0 32 D D 1 40 DSDV –one more example Computer Network

  48. A - ∞ 13 B B 0 20 A B C C 1 32 A A 0 13 D C 2 40 B - ∞ 21 A C 3 10 C - ∞ 31 B C 2 20 D - ∞ 41 C C 1 32 D D 0 40 A B 2 10 C D A move out of range of all other nodes B B 1 20 C C 0 32 D D 1 40 DSDV –one more example B detects A’s movement Odd number Odd numbers for all destinations Computer Network

  49. A - ∞ 13 B B 0 22 A B C C 1 32 A A 0 13 D C 2 40 B - ∞ 21 A C 3 10 C - ∞ 31 B C 2 20 D - ∞ 41 C C 1 32 D D 0 40 A - ∞ 13 C D B broadcasts its modified route table B B 1 22 C C 0 32 D D 1 40 DSDV –one more example Computer Network

  50. DSDV –one more example A - ∞ 13 B B 0 22 A B C C 1 34 A A 0 12 D C 2 40 B - ∞ 21 A - ∞ 13 C - ∞ 31 B C 2 22 D - ∞ 41 C C 1 34 C broadcasts its modified route table D D 0 40 A - ∞ 13 C D B B 1 22 As a result contents of all tables are same exception for A C C 0 34 D D 1 40 Computer Network

More Related