1 / 18

Exploring Indicators for Best E-Waste Policies

Investigating the effectiveness of e-waste policies using indicators and evaluating various national policies to recommend the best strategies for managing e-waste. The study highlights the challenges in using indicators for policy evaluation and emphasizes the need for tailored approaches based on country-specific contexts.

clarkrichard
Download Presentation

Exploring Indicators for Best E-Waste Policies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EASY–ECO 2010 Sustainable Development Evaluations in Europe: From a Decade of Practices, Politics and Science to Emerging Demands Brussels , 17-19 November 2010 The limits of indicators in public policy evaluation: The case of e-waste. Cédric Gossart

  2. The Holy Grail of policy evaluation « Is my policy evaluation going to be of any use?

  3. The e-waste problem • WEEE = Waste of Electrical and Electronic Equipment • Hazardous waste • 40 000 000 tonnes (world) • 300% growth rate in developing countries • Illegal exports

  4. E-waste policies • Europe: WEEE Directive 2002/96/EC • USA: State patchwork (NCER: 20% collection rate) • China: China WEEE effective in 2011 • Switzerland: since 1994 (>80% collection rate) • France: since 2006 (25% collection rate)

  5. Best E-waste Policies project Initial aim: To comparatively evaluate different national policies and legislation on e-waste and, from this, to come up with legal and policy recommendations for “best e-waste policies”... 4

  6. The indicators project Aim:To explore how indicators can be used to identify best e-waste policies. • Step 1: Collect indicators to build the e-waste profile of different countries, • Step 2: Compare these profiles and identify key factors conducive to best e-waste policies.

  7. « Best » e-waste policy? Policy which outcomes meet the objectives defined in the official ewaste policy of a given country. • No one-size-fits-all: • The definition of “good” results varies across countries, • A policy producing good results in country A may not produce the same results in country B. • The criteria upon which e-waste policies are to be evaluated is the outcome of a democratic choice that cannot be determined by experts evaluating these policies (e.g. costs of the take back system, or collection and treatment rates).

  8. Method • Collect indicators: • Explore several cases (European countries: to find data more easily => mostly early movers: Switzerland, Belgium, Netherlands, France), • Build framework for e-waste profile based on collected indicators, • Test framework on one early moving country (Switzerland). • Identify key factors supporting best e-waste policies: • Questionnaire to stakeholders (data analysis not enough)

  9. Results • E-waste profile of Switzerland • Mapping available indicators (.../…) • Objective data analysis difficult to identify factors => Questionnaire for subjective analysis of factors conducive to best e-waste policies.

  10. 1) E-waste profile of Switzerland

  11. 2) Mapping of available indicators

  12. Conclusions (1/2) Andrew Jordan (UEA) • Implementation lies in the hands of member states • Need common evaluation criteria that go beyond mere economic efficiency John Hontelez (EEB) • Simple indicators may have more impact on the policy-making process than complex indicators sets.

  13. Conclusions (2/2) • The Holy Grail of policy evaluation does not exist. • My evaluation has been useful if somebody has learned something along the way. • I learned how to reach the saturated ears of policy-makers and citizens: • The E-waste Solutions Index (ESI) …/…

  14. Source: StEP @ project internal document, please do not quote.

  15. Thank you Cédric Gossart Associate Professor, Telecom InstituteETOS research group9, rue Charles Fourier - 91011, Evry Cedex – FranceTel. : +33 (0)1 60 76 46 69Fax : +33 (0)1 60 76 42 86 Email: Cedric.Gossart@telecom-em.euhttp://etos.it-sudparis.eu/membres/CedricGossart/Home.htm

  16. The E-waste Solutions Index (ESI).

  17. http://www.step-initiative.org

More Related