1 / 14

MULTICOM – A Combination Pipeline for Protein Structure Prediction

This paper introduces MULTICOM, a structure prediction pipeline that combines various methods to predict protein structure. The pipeline includes template identification, multi-template combination, model generation, model evaluation, and multi-model combination. The pipeline incorporates tools such as PSI-BLAST, HHSearch, FOLDpro, SPEM, Modeller, and Rosetta. It aims to improve template-free modeling and achieve better accuracy in protein structure prediction.

clausing
Download Presentation

MULTICOM – A Combination Pipeline for Protein Structure Prediction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MULTICOM – A Combination Pipeline for Protein Structure Prediction Jianlin Cheng Computer Science Department & Informatics Institute University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA

  2. MULTICOM Structure Prediction Pipeline Server Predictor Query Sequence 1. Template Identification 2. Multi-Template Combination Human Predictor All CASP8 Server Models 3. Model Generation 4. Model Evaluation 5. Multi-Model Combination Output

  3. MULTICOM Structure Prediction Pipeline Query Sequence • PSI-BLAST • HHSearch • COMPASS • FOLDpro + SPEM 1. Template Identification 2. Multi-Template Combination Query-template alignments: 3. Model Generation 4. Model Evaluation 5. Multi-Model Combination Find a set of good templates / fragments; generate alternative query-template alignments Output

  4. MULTICOM Structure Prediction Pipeline Query Sequence 1. Template Identification Combination 1. Combine top ranked query- template alignment (QTA) with other significant QTAs 2. Take fragments from less significant QTA (Template-free) 2. Multi-Template Combination 3. Model Generation 4. Model Evaluation Don’t try to find the best template; Instead combine multiple good templates / fragments. 5. Multi-Model Combination Output

  5. MULTICOM Structure Prediction Pipeline Query Sequence 1. Template Identification Integrative Model Generation • Modeller • Rosetta for template-free • small domains 2. Multi-Template Combination 3. Model Generation 4. Model Evaluation Domain-level combination of template-based and template-freeapproaches 5. Multi-Model Combination Output

  6. MULTICOM Structure Prediction Pipeline Query Sequence 1. Template Identification Model Ranking by ModelEvaluator 2. Multi-Template Combination 3. Model Generation 4. Model Evaluation 5. Multi-Model Combination Output

  7. ModelEvaluator Ab initio Sequence-Based Structural Feature Prediction 3D Model Secondary Structure Comparison EEEECCEEEHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEECCEEEHHHH Relative Solvent Accessibility eeee-----eeeee----------eeeee------eeeee---eeeeeeee Contact Map Beta-Sheet Pairing Good models ranked at the top. Very effective for template-free models. Input Features Predicted GDT-TS score

  8. MULTICOM Structure Prediction Pipeline Query Sequence • Start from a top ranked model • Combine it with other models • having global similarity (80%, 4Å) • 3. Combine it with the longest similar model fragments 1. Template Identification Global-Local Model Combination 2. Multi-Template Combination Modeller Iterative Modeling 3. Model Generation Average Model 4. Model Evaluation Don’t try to find the best model. Instead combine multiple good models / fragments (2-3% improvement). 5. Multi-Model Combination Output

  9. Good Template-Free Example: T0416_2 Structure MULTICOM (GDT = 0.66, RMSD = 2.5) Combination of 20 models: Zhang-Server Robetta TASSER MULTICOM YASARA forecast Success: rank very good models at top. Superposition (red: model) (Courtesy by Prof. Joel Sussman)

  10. Good Template-Free Example: T0513_2 Structure MULTICOM (GDT = 0.73, RMSD=2.1) Combine Robetta models Better than each one of them Success: rank very good models at top and combination improves modeling. Superposition (blue: model)

  11. Not Good Template-Free Example: T0405_1 Structure (Helix Bundle) MULTICOM GDT = 0.41 Superposition (by Prof. Sussman) (Gray: structure, yellow: best model green: MULTICOM model) Failure: ModelEvaluator fails to identify correct helix orientations.

  12. Concluding Remarks • CASP Community can sometime generate good template-free models (e.g. Rosetta-based tools) • ModelEvaluator can rank good template-free models at the top • Iterative global-local combination of models can improve template-free modeling • Blending of template-free and template-based modeling

  13. Blending of Template-Free and Template-Based Modeling 100% TBM 50% TBM+50%FM 100% FM Protein Modeling Spectrum

  14. Acknowledgements • CASP8 organizers and assessors • CASP8 participants • MU colleagues: Dong Xu, Toni Kazic • My group: Zheng Wang Allison Tegge Xin Deng

More Related