230 likes | 363 Views
Air Products Reactor Catalyst Changeout. Daniel Brisach, Nick Dobies, Laura Elliott, Chris Reed, Janessa Smith. Presentation Agenda. Project Objectives and Scope Background Concept Solution Cost Analysis Summary Questions and Discussion. Project Objective.
E N D
Air ProductsReactor Catalyst Changeout Daniel Brisach, Nick Dobies, Laura Elliott, Chris Reed, Janessa Smith
Presentation Agenda • Project Objectives and Scope • Background • Concept Solution • Cost Analysis • Summary • Questions and Discussion
Project Objective The objective of this project is to develop a more effective way for operators to load the catalyst used for the production of TEDA into the main reactor.
Project Scope • Design a system to load 18 drums of catalyst into the TEDA reactor • Revise the Safe Work Practice of the reactor catalyst changeout process
Current Process • Hoist with carriage
Current Process • Manual dumping with a mopping bucket
The Design Drum is loaded and secured to cart. Cart is winched up the track. Barrel empties via linkage engagement using pistons. Cart stops once in pouring position.
Components • Track (rail) • C3x6 Steel C-Channel • Can be cycled indefinitely under normal operating conditions • Custom fabricated
Components • Track Support • 2” x 2” square tube • Can be cycled indefinitely under normal operating conditions • Custom fabricated • Accommodates pulley system
Components • Pulley System • Guides and powers the cart throughout its path of motion • Custom pulley and winch, some stock components
Components • Cart • Can cycle indefinitely under normal operating conditions • Custom fabricated • Facilitates dumping motion
Validation • Fabricated components were designed for infinite fatigue life. • All stock parts have a high factor of safety. • Favored safety when assumptions were required.
Prototype • Tested pouring trajectory with respect to the manhole
Results • Successfully emptied catalyst into model manhole with zero waste • Determined optimum positioning between rail and manhole • Determined that 90° of tilt would be necessary to empty entire drum • Drum cone did not require a valve
Results • Prototype Test
Benefit to the Sponsor • A safer and more ergonomic process • Reduction of reactor downtime by approximately 24 hours • Reduction of man-hours from 36 to 9 • Labor savings of about 100 hours/year
Cost Analysis • Total: $14,483 • Rail and support: $1787 • Cart: $2401 • Winch, pulleys, pneumatic supply: $6395 • Drum cone and collar: $1400 • Safety fence: $500 • Labor: $2000 • Total without cone: $13,083
Current Status • Successfully designed and validated our best concept. • Analyzed budget and installation costs and sources. • Closed the loop through sponsor feedback. • Ready to Celebrate.
Going Forward • Deliver design to Air Products so the implementation path may chosen.
Acknowledgements • Our sponsor – Air Products • Our advisor – Dr. Wilkins • Dr. Glancey • Steve Beard • Jeff Bupp – Metal contracting • Motor Pool personnel