401 likes | 2.67k Views
CARE International. And CARE USA “Defending Dignity. Fighting Poverty.”. Molly Cunningham. CARE takes a holistic view of health and fighting global poverty. The Sustainable Livelihoods Approach. They focus on Cross-Cutting Initiatives. Women’s Empowerment. Agriculture & Natural Resources.
E N D
CARE International And CARE USA “Defending Dignity. Fighting Poverty.” Molly Cunningham
CARE takes a holistic view of health and fighting global poverty The Sustainable Livelihoods Approach
They focus on Cross-Cutting Initiatives Women’s Empowerment Agriculture & Natural Resources Economic Development Health Education Emergency Relief HIV/ AIDS Nutrition Water
CARE was Founded 1945 as“Cooperative for American Remittances to Europe” “Care Packages”
CARE USA was the first and still isthe biggest constituent member • 7 member Executive Board • 17 member Board of Directors • 12 Regional Offices, Headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia Helene D. Gayle MD, MPH- President and CEO, CARE USA
Programs depend on local needs CARE International in 87 countries Over 1000 different projects worldwide 97% of CI and CUSA employees are nationals
“I am powerful” Campaign • Maternal Health • Improving access to schools * Microfinancing
Finances Revenue • CARE USA is the largest: $586 million revenue FY 2009 • Total CI revenue FY 2009: $901 million Expenses • FY 2009, CARE USA $601 million • CI FY 2009, $909 million http://charityreports.bbb.org/national/relief-and-development/care-usa-in-atlanta-ga-119#bbbComments
CARE USA Oxfam USA
Pros and Cons • Pros • 97% of employees are nationals
Pros and Cons • Pros • 97% of employees are nationals • 2012 Top 100 NGOs- CI is #7 (oxfam #3, PIH #2, Wikimedia #1)
Pros • 97% of employees are nationals • 2012 Top 100 NGOs- CI is #7 (oxfam #3, PIH #2, Wikimedia #1) • Financial Transparency from 1988-2011
Pros and Cons • Pros • 97% of employees are nationals • 2012 Top 100 NGOs- CI is #7 (oxfam #3, PIH #2, Wikimedia #1) • Financial Transparency from 1988-2011
Pros and Cons • Pros • 97% of employees are nationals • 2012 Top 100 NGOs- CI is #7 (oxfam #3, PIH #2, Wikimedia #1) • Financial Transparency from 1988-2011 Cons • Financing of Administrators?
Pros and Cons • Pros • 97% of employees are nationals • 2012 Top 100 NGOs- CI is #7 (oxfam #3, PIH #2, Wikimedia #1) • Financial Transparency from 1988-2011 Cons • Financing of Administrators? • Corporate Involvement?
Pros and Cons • Pros • 97% of employees are nationals • 2012 Top 100 NGOs- CI is #7 (oxfam #3, PIH #2, Wikimedia #1) • Financial Transparency from 1988-2011 • Cons • Financing of Administators? • Corporate Involvement? • Possible Data Analysis shortage and selective bias
Pros and Cons • Pros • 97% of employees are nationals • 2012 Top 100 NGOs- CI is #7 (oxfam #3, PIH #2, Wikimedia #1) • Financial Transparency from 1988-2011 • Cons • Financing of Administators? • Corporate Involvement? • Possible Data Analysis shortage and selective bias
References/ credits • http://greatnonprofits.org/whitelabel/reviews/care-cooperative-for-assistance-and-relief-everywhere#r_id-91822--user_id-105155 • http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/2011/05/01/when-is-humanitarian-aid-inhumane-%E2%80%98the-crisis-caravan%E2%80%99/ • http://www.care.org/index.asp • http://theglobaljournal.net/article/view/585/ • http://www.care-international.org/Media-Releases/care-launches-2010-annual-report.html • http://charityreports.bbb.org/national/relief-and-development/care-usa-in-atlanta-ga-119#bbbComments • https://www.msu.edu/unit/phl/devconference/CAREVillSavLoanAfr.pdf • http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1653360,00.html • http://www.humanecologyreview.org/pastissues/her131/knutsson.pdf • Photos • Photos from the Care USA website;; care.org