1 / 10

Andreas Streun, PSI LER-3, Oxford, July 8-10, 2013

The A nti- B end C ell for low emittance up to factor 2 lower emittance without J x -manipulation. Andreas Streun, PSI LER-3, Oxford, July 8-10, 2013. Classical TME cell Theoretical Minimum Emittance:.

cleo
Download Presentation

Andreas Streun, PSI LER-3, Oxford, July 8-10, 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Anti-Bend Cell for low emittance up to factor 2 lower emittance without Jx-manipulation Andreas Streun, PSILER-3, Oxford, July 8-10, 2013

  2. Classical TME cellTheoretical Minimum Emittance: ProblemGet minimum bo, ho at center andperiodic solution (a = h’ = 0 at ends)  cell phase advance: m = 284.5° long cell, strong quads, large chroma...  bxbyh h = 1 / r F, L, h

  3. Deviations from minimum conditions F = e / emin Ellipse equation: Cell phase advance real cells: Dm< 180° F ~ 3...6

  4. The anti-bend cell concept • TME cell: too weak focusing of dispersion  add a small negative dipole: anti-bendDh’ = sin < 0 • quads only for beta-matching at moderate phase advance m. • TME optics at lower m ! • Side effects on emittance: • main dipole angle increased by | | • anti-bend at large H

  5. Anti-bend vs. TME cell simplified anti-bend cell bxbyh thin quad anti-bend main bend F b d m ~ 150°: lower emittance due to lower dispersion at comparable beta. ideal TMEat 284.5° thick lines: anti-bend thin lines: TME

  6. Jx adjustment h = dipole curvature = 1/ r • push Jx ~2 to get half emittance (e ~ 1 / Jx ) • h>0 h > 0 b2 < 0defocusing gradient bend • h>0 h < 0 b2 > 0focusing gradient anti-bend • convenient magnet design:anti-bend = half quadrupole SLS booster half quad

  7. Anti-bend cell Example half quad anti-bend-0.54° tuning quads 6.43° cell 2.4 GeV mx = 154.2°( = 3 / 7 ) my = 25.7° ( = 1 / 14 ) Comparison ABC TME e 258 739 pm Jx1.97 1.32 e·Jx508 975 pm L 2.75 2.50 m se 9.7 7.7 10-4 DE 7.7 6.3 keV sext. 7.5°, 110 cm TME cell 6.4°, 94 cm

  8. Compact low-emittance ring - DRAFT - • 845°8BA (7 cells), 85 m straights. • 2.4 GeV, 246 m circumference. • e = 228 pm, Jx =2.24, se= 0.107 %, DE=367 keV. • Bpoletip (T) for R=15 mm: bends 1.0, quads 0.8, sext 0.5, oct 0.1 DA and 24 mm  beam pipe

  9. Orbit bump Anti-bend from dipole downfeed in quadrupole. (TRACY simulation) known from Dp < 0 orbits !

  10. Conclusion • A small anti-bend provides the dispersion matching missing in the standard TME cell. • Almost factor 2 lower emittance compared to TME cell of same tune and same Jx. • Disadvantage: requires rather highcell tune ~ 0.42..0.44 (150..160°). • Anti-bend as half quad: set Jx ~ 2, and convenient magnet design.

More Related