620 likes | 836 Views
Butter, Guns and Ice-cream Economic Theories of Conflict. Raul Caruso raul.caruso@unicatt.it. I. The Economic Theory of conflict. Conflict and Economics. Conflict, as a rational activity, plays as large a role in economic development as do production and exchange.
E N D
Butter, Guns and Ice-creamEconomic Theories of Conflict Raul Caruso raul.caruso@unicatt.it
Conflict and Economics Conflict, as a rational activity, plays as large a role in economic development as do production and exchange. You can buy something, but you can also steal it. You can appropriate, confiscate, grab, plunder instead of producing, contracting or exchanging. A definition which embraces the main characteristics of conflict could be: a conflict is a destructive interaction which involves strategic, interdependent decisions in the presence of coercion and anarchy .
Simple Classical Intuition This dichotomy was first emphasized by Vilfredo Pareto in 1902 when he stated: «The efforts of men are utilized in two different ways: they are directed to the production or transformation of economic goods, or else to the appropriation of goods produced by others». The first - productive activities - are beneficial for society, whilst the latter- unproductive and even destructive - are detrimental to welfare and development. The classical labelling introduced by Samuelson is ‘Butter’ and ‘Guns’.
Cornerstones and Literature The recent pionereeing contribution is by Hirshleifer(1988) and following contributions (Grossman, AER, 1991, Skaperdas, AER, 1992, Grossman and Kim, JPE, 1995, Neary, EI, 1997, Anderton et al., EI,1999, Noh, PC, 1999, Dixit, 2004, Munster, ET, 2007), (see the survey by Garfinkel and Skaperdas 2007). Most contributions analyze a one-sector economy. Agents are supposed to split their resources endowment in ‘butter’ and ‘guns’. The trade-off is simple: as guns increase, butter must decrease. There is no alternative allocation for available resources. Produce or Predate.
Common results of this literature (i) conflict is a redistributive activity. Thus, the poorer parties are able to improve their relative position to the opponents. (ii) Asymmetry in technology of fighting does matter. That is, the relative advantage of one conflict technology over another must be negligible to produce cooperation between parties. (iii) Productive technology does lower the incentive to fighting. Moreover, the higher is the productive interdependence between parties the lower will be the incentive to conflict.
Conflict and endogenous institutions The economic theory of conflict contributes to studying the endogenous development of institutions in societies where property rights are not fully enforced. In this vein, recent studies by Dixit (2004), Acemoglu and Robinson (2006), Greif (2006) and North et al. (2009) contributed in different ways to the study of institutions through a theoretical reasoning which took into account the existence the conflict from the start.
Economic development of societies I would explain the motivation of this paper quoting Baumol (1990) […]while the total supply of entrepreneurs varies among societies, the productive contribution of the society's entrepreneurial activities varies much more because of their allocation between productive activities such as innovation and largely unproductive activities such as rent seeking or organized crime. This allocation is heavily influenced by the relative payoffs society offers to such activities. This implies that policy can influence the allocation of entrepreneurship more effectively than it can influence its supply […]
II. Enrichment of the theory: Modeling a dual economy in the presence of conflict
Modeling a dual economy The implicit assumption of classical models is that all butter is contested. There is no alternative allocation for available resources. Produce or Predate. But, we can consider a two-sector economy: Contested Sector two agents struggle in order to appropriate the maximum possible fraction of a contestable output. Uncontested Sector each agent holds secure property rights over the production of some goods. Parties involved in a conflict can have some income and wealth secure from appropriation.
Why uncontested? Institutional settings: There could be sectors where enforcement of property rights can be more effective than others. Geography, there could be geographical factors shielding some sectors from destructive conflicts and violent appropriation. In general, there could physical obstacles to appropriation.
Butter, Guns and Ice Cream With a contested-uncontested distinction, there are three possible allocations of resources, (i) guns, (ii) butter, and (iii) ice-cream. Ice-cream denotes all the productive activities which are not under threat of appropriation. In other words, all the business activities which are not directly affected by the existence of a bloody conflict. In such a case the opportunity cost of conflicts would be related not only to the contested production but also to the production of goods which are not subject to appropriation.
The Model There are two agents. They have a positive resources endowment which can be split in ‘butter’(x), ‘guns’(G) and ‘ice-creams’(y):
The model Therefore, at a certain point in time, income accruing to each agent is a function of contributions of both sectors as: And the social outcome (as total income) is given by:
Results (a) as the productivity in the ice-cream increases, a party will prefer to allocate more resources to it; and (b) whenever the warring parties do not sufficiently value the losses from foregone production and destruction in the short-term, they have fewer incentives to allocate resources to the uncontested sector.
Simple results (1) The opportunity cost of conflicts is related not only to the production of butter but also to the production of ice-cream. (2) as the productivity in the uncontested sector increases each agent will prefer to allocate more resources to the uncontested sector, namely in the production of ice cream; (3)when the conflict is perceived to be non-destructive each agent has fewer incentives to invest in the uncontested sector.
Examples Fitting examples could be drawn from many developing African countries experiences the famous ‘resource curse’. Warlords compete by investments in guns to appropriate a fraction of the contested resource (butter). In many cases, bloody conflicts are localized in mineral-abundant regions, while other territories are not greatly affected by war and predation. In less developed countries, agriculture and small manufacturing presumably constitute a large portion of economic activity of these uncontested territories. Such sectors can be included within the class of ice-cream.
Hence….. A society with a higher proportion of resources devoted to ice-cream could be considered preferred. Whenever a higher proportion of resources is allocated to the uncontested sector, fewer resources will be allocated to the contested sector. The likelihood of (re) descending into a bloody conflict should be decreasing in the level of ice-cream.
Economic analysis of Civil wars There is a widespread agreement that the incidence of civil wars is positively associated with the abundance of natural resources. See among others: Collier and Hoeffler (1998/2000/2004), Le Billon (2001a), De Soysa (2002), Sambanis (2001/2002), Bannon and Collier (2003), Fearon and Laitin (2003), Fearon (2005), Humphreys (2005), Lujala et al. (2005), De Soysa and Neumayer (2007), Collier and Rohner (2008).
Enrichment It is possible to to complement the existing literature on civil wars by highlighting the relationship between different sectors of economy and the incidence of civil wars In particular, the structure of an economy is captured through the breakdown of GDP by main sectors: (i) manufacturing sector; (ii) mining sector; (iii) agriculture. Such an approach is theoretically underpinned by a distinction between contested and uncontested sectors.
Policy Implications Clearly, the cooperative management of contested resources - what we have termed butter - is the most important issue. To stress other points consider: (1) reducing arms spending; (2) providing economic incentives to ice-cream production; (3) improving productivity in the long run;
Reduction of Guns A common but erroneous belief is that government should increase military spending in order to ensure the stability of social order and guarantee security . Two theoretical points counter this idea: • First, it is clear that military spending has an adverse effect on economic growth by crowding out private productive investments. • Second, social systems based upon threats and deterrence are intrinsically unstable
Swords-Hunt Reduction of arms cannot be limited only to government and rival fighting groups. It is well-known that small arms tend to proliferate among the citizens and residents of war-torn countries. This phenomenon can increase violence, which, even if it is not committed to overthrowing the ruling government, negatively affects economic and social development.
Swords-Hunt A civilian disarmament plan should be implemented, followed by the enforcement of strict gun control laws. The most famous historical example is the Japanese sword hunt (katana-gari), which occurred in 1588. Before the hunt, civilians were free to carry weapons for personal defense. There is evidence that the Japanese peasantry achieved an improvement in living standards However, it took a long time. It Begun in 1588, and the final step took place only in 1876.
Swords Hunt: Note However, violent seizure of weapons could be also counter-effective. A sword hunt policy can be sustained if and only if the government is sufficiently credible. Credibility, trust and legitimacy take time to root themselves in the public consciousness. Therefore, in order to sustain such a plan in the short-term, a policy of monetary compensation favoring voluntary disarmament could be adopted.
Economic Incentives for Ice Cream Production Incentivizing ice-cream production implies a broad spectrum of policies favoring and encouraging the development of businesses not directly affected by conflict. In the long-run, this policy can shape the whole structure of the economy. Ross compares Nigeria and Indonesia. whilst the Nigerian government has focused on development of the petroleum sector, the Indonesian government has been committed to create incentives for productive sectors such as manufacturing and agriculture.
Productivity We said that productivity in the production of ice-cream can be considered as a force countervailing the incentives for conflict. Then,consider: • Investments in education; • Public provision of health services; • Reduction of Military spending (one more time)( this is also a qualitative concept)
Military Spending (to close the story) The Nobel L. Klein demonstrated that military expenditures decreased total factor productivity over the period 1971-1991 in five countries of Southern Cone region. That is, investments in guns affect negatively the production of ice cream both quantitatively (less ice cream) and qualitatively (worst ice cream)
Education and Health Schooling and health improve productivity in the long run. Public policies of education and health cannot be postponed. The Nobel Gary Becker (1981) said: The policy that I have been trying to promote for ten years or more, and now has been implemented, at least in Brazil and Mexico which I follow very carefully, is to “bribe” the poor parents to keep their children in school. By that I mean to give them a monthly supplement conditional on three things: that children attend school regularly, that they do well, and that children attend regular health check-ups. Because health is a problem for the very poor, the program combines attendance and performance at school with health checks.
Aims and potential contributions • Following the previous idea, the relative profitability between sectors has an impact on intensity of conflict and economic outcomes. • The empirical section contributes to the empirical economic literature on civil wars and resource curse in African countries (see among others Collier and Hoeffler (1998/2000/2004), Fearon and Laitin (2003), De Soysa. I., Neumayer E., (2007). • This work also contributes to the debate about the impact of globalization on domestic conflict in LDCs.
The Model: Assumptions (reprise) The world is made of region 1, region 2 and the rest of the world (ROW). Regions can produce two tradable goods which are to be sold to ROW. Economy of both regions is made of: (1) Contested Sector The two regions struggle in order to appropriate the maximum possible fraction of a contestable output. It is assumed to exhibit CRS; (2) Uncontested Sector each region holds secure property rights over the production of some goods. It is assumed to exhibit DRS. There are three possible allocations of resources, (i) guns, (ii) butter, and (iii) ice-cream. Butter and guns denote the classical trade-off between production and appropriation in contested sectors. Ice-cream denotes all the productive activities which are not under threat of appropriation. The opportunity cost of conflict would be related not only to the contested production but also to the production of goods which are not subject to appropriation. In this work the opportunity cost of conflict is related to the relative profitability of the two sectors.
The Model: Timing • in the first stage, agents observe an exogenous price for both butter and ice-cream. They are SOE. • agents move simultaneously and choose an optimal level of guns and ice cream. The supply of both butter and guns is determined through conflict; • Market clears and prices of butter and ice-cream take shape. • Payoffs are assigned, final incomes are attained and the final outcome of the regions is realised
Payoffs The resources endowment is to be divided between Guns, butter and ice-cream Initial Relative Price of butter in terms of ice-cream the final income of each agent is a function of contributions of both sectors CSF as axiomatized by Skaperdas (ET, 1996)
Butter and Guns the quantity of butter and guns is increasing in the initial relative price of butter in terms of ice-cream.
Ice Cream the higher is the initial relative price of butter in terms of ice-cream, the smaller will be the production of ice-cream. In particular, it is also interesting that the supply of ice-cream increases in the degree of productivity only in the presence of a combination of p and s. That is, when p is high enough, it can dominate the beneficial impact on production emerging in the presence of an adequate degree of productivity.
The Rest of the World = 1. The rest of the world (ROW) has Cobb- Douglas preferences. 2. The ROW purchases the total supply of butter and ice cream and maximizes its utility under the constraint
Market Clearing equations The supply of the different commodities is nothing but the equilibrium quantities of butter and ice-cream chosen by regions:
Prices after conflict The price of butter is decreasing in the initial relative price only in the presence of specific combinations of p, s and TR. the price of ice-cream is unambiguously increasing in p.
Results • the supply of butter and guns are increasing in the initial relative price of butter in terms of ice-cream. • The supply of ice-cream is increasing in the degree of productivity if and only if the initial relative price of butter in terms of ice-cream is low enough. • Final prices of Ice-cream are increasing in the initial relative price of butter in terms of ice-cream. • Final income of both regions is decreasing in the initial relative price of butter in terms of ice-cream
A novel Empirical Application to explain Civil Wars in Sub-Saharan Africa (1995-2006)
Novelty of this work Following the theoretical predictions the analysis focuses not only on the commodity prices (aka price of butter) but rather on the relative price of commoditiesin terms of manufactures (aka price of Ice-cream).
Civil Wars in Sub-Saharan Africa 1995-2006 Few studies address directly the impact of commodities prices. Besley and persson (2008, wp), Bruckner and Ciccone (2010, EJ), Angrist and Kluger (2008, RES), Dube and Vargas (2008, wp).