1 / 21

Group level intervention strategies

Group level intervention strategies. Chapter 18. (1 more to go!). What is a group?. Zander (1982) For a collection of individuals to be a classified as a group. GROUP LEVEL INTERVENTION STRATEGIES.

clive
Download Presentation

Group level intervention strategies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Group level intervention strategies Chapter 18. (1 more to go!)

  2. What is a group? • Zander (1982) • For a collection of individuals to be a classified as a group

  3. GROUP LEVEL INTERVENTION STRATEGIES • “Coming together is a beginning, staying together is progress, and working together is success” (Henry Ford) • Coming together: • Staying together: • Working together:

  4. THE DYERSVILLE EXPERIENCE • The Beginning. • Ford’s beginning had been realized—

  5. THE DYERSVILLE EXPERIENCE • The Progress • Strategies to • Ford’s “Progress” also had been realized—

  6. THE DYERSVILLE EXPERIENCE • The Success. • How successful was the Dyersville campaign?

  7. Gr. Env. Distinctiveness Gr. Process Interaction and Communication Sacrifices Gr. Cohesion ATG-Task ATG-Social GI-Task GI-Scoial Gr. Structure Norms & Positions THEORETICAL FOUNDATION FOR GROUP ENDEAVORS IN PHYSICAL ACTIVITY SETTINGS • But it was not a controlled experiment…. • So Carron and Spink’s Framework.

  8. THEORETICAL FOUNDATION FOR GROUP ENDEAVORS IN PHYSICAL ACTIVITY SETTINGS • In Dyersville

  9. TEAM BUILDING INTERVENTIONS IN PHYSICAL ACTIVITY SETTINGS • Carron and Spink (1993) • female participants in -------- • The classes met • Randomly assigned to • A four-stage process consisting of an • 1. • 2. • 3. • 4.

  10. TEAM BUILDING INTERVENTIONS IN PHYSICAL ACTIVITY SETTINGS • Was it a success?

  11. How do these findings generalize? • As cohesion is a predictor of exercise participation in older exercisers, …

  12. Estabrooks and Carron • Aim: • Participants: • 3 groups: • Procedure: • Measurement:

  13. Results

  14. Results

  15. TEAM BUILDING INTERVENTIONS IN PHYSICAL ACTIVITY SETTINGS • James Annesi (1999) – • Subsequent study: • Participants: • Procedure:

  16. TEAM BUILDING INTERVENTIONS IN PHYSICAL ACTIVITY SETTINGS • Results: • Conclusions

  17. CONCERNS ABOUT GROUP-BASED INTERVENTIONS • Are Group-based intervention effective in the short-term but counter productive for long-term participation? (Abby King) • 1. • 2. • 3.

  18. CONCERNS ABOUT GROUP-BASED INTERVENTIONS • No studies examined physical activity participation once the program terminated. • The question that remains is—

  19. CONCERNS ABOUT GROUP-BASED INTERVENTIONS • Brawley and colleagues’ (2000) • Participants: • Three conditions:

  20. CONCERNS ABOUT GROUP-BASED INTERVENTIONS • Time: • 1st 3-month period, • group-motivated cognitive-behavioral condition and the standard physical activity condition:

  21. CONCERNS ABOUT GROUP-BASED INTERVENTIONS • In the final 3-month period, • Results:

More Related