1 / 35

Lexical Semantics. An Introduction

Lexical Semantics. An Introduction. Boris Iomdin Russian Language Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences iomdin@ruslang.ru. Lecture 9. Plan. Homonymy and synonymy as the fundamental features of the linguistic sign Ability to paraphrase and select as part of linguistic competence

clyde
Download Presentation

Lexical Semantics. An Introduction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lexical Semantics. An Introduction Boris Iomdin Russian Language Institute,Russian Academy of Sciences iomdin@ruslang.ru

  2. Lecture 9. Plan • Homonymy and synonymy as the fundamental features of the linguistic sign • Ability to paraphrase and select as part of linguistic competence • Criteria of synonymy • Sources of synonymy • Types of co-occurrence differences • Dictionaries of synonyms • New Explanatory Dictionary of Russian Synonyms: history, principles and structure

  3. Asymmetric dualism of the linguistic sign • S. Kartsevski, Du dualisme asymétrique du signe linguistique, Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague 1, 1929 • We speak and comprehend only “approximately”, without even noticing it • Most words have several different meanings, and most meanings can be expressed by several different words.

  4. Homonymy and synonymy • One signifier, several signifieds: homonymy • English: table, bear, miss, type, lie • Russian: пол (‘floor’ / ‘sex’) • One signified, several signifiers: synonymy • English: speak, talk, utter, say, verbalise, … • Czech: mluvit, řečnit, říct, povědět, hovořit, … Lexical semantics mostly deals with synonyms, computational linguistics mostly deals with homonymy and its resolution

  5. Linguistic competence • Semantic precision: selecting those items of lexicon and grammar which exactly express speaker’s thoughts • Idiomatic usage: ability to observe lexical and syntactic co-occurrence constraints • Flexibility: ability to paraphrase, express an idea in a wide variety of ways while leaving the content unchanged • Selective ability: capacity to select from a large number of ways of expressing an idea the one which is the most appropriate for the situation

  6. Paraphrasing ability • Boris is a lecturer of lexical semantics • Boris gives lectures on lexical semantics • The students study semantics with Boris • Boris teaches semantics to the students • Some students are always present at the lectures • Some students are never absent at the lectures

  7. Paraphrasing and synonyms Can synonyms replace each other? • Exact synonyms • Inexact synonyms • if their semantic distinctions are neutralizable • if their co-occurrence characteristics are similar

  8. Exact synonyms • shortsightedness – nearsightedness – myopia • lawyer – attorney • doctor – physician • Language usually does not retain exact synonyms. Non-functional difference is avoided • Regional differences: • flat – apartment • couch – sofa – chesterfield – divan • In some metalinguistic contexts, even exact synonyms are non interchangeable: • Myopia has 6 letters – Shortsightedness has 6 letters

  9. Criteria of synonymy • Same explication • Same role structure • study ≠ teach • buy ≠ sell • Same part of speech • quick ≠ quickly • (a) support ≠ (to) support

  10. Sources of synonymy • Each language constantly changes its vocabulary • Expressive lexicon is especially liable to synonymy • Synonymic derivation: words X and Y have a meaning ‘A’. Word X develops a meaning ‘B’, then word Y develops meaning ‘B’, too • French: comprendre – piger ‘understand’, polir – fourbir – nettoyer ‘steal’ • Word formation synonymy: absurdity – absurdness • Loanwords: bull – beef, jail – prison, shoe – boot

  11. Co-occurrence differences • Semantic co-occurrence • Lexical co-occurrence • Morphosyntactical co-occurrence • Exact match  • Containment  • Intersection  • No match  3  4 = 12 types of differences

  12. Partial co-occurence • Ego slova dostigli celi His words achieved their aim • *Ego slova dobilis’ celi*His words gained their aim • For achieve, the subject can be not only human, but also words, deeds, qualities, … • For gain, only humans

  13. Dictionaries • First dictionary of English synonyms:John Trusler, Gabriel Girard. Difference between Words Esteemed Synonymous in the English Language, and the Proper Choice of them Determined, 1766

  14. Dictionaries of synonyms • More than 350 dictionaries of English synonyms have been published since 1766 • Webster’s New Dictionary of Synonyms, one of the most comprehensive and detailed • Various types, including: • inventories (wordlists) • bilingual, trilingual, … • explanatory dictionaries

  15. Disadvantages • Synonymy is often regarded as a rather incomplete correspondence of senses • Synonymic relationship often established between whole polysemous words, not individual lexemes • As a rule, only direct and primary meanings included • Only semantic distinctions are regarded (but not collocational, stylistic, syntactic, grammatical…) • Low style vocabulary often disregarded • No formal metalanguage used

  16. Russian dictionaries • Abramov (1915) • Pavlov-Shishkin and Stefanovsky (1931) • Klyueva (1961) • Aleksandrova(1989) • Evgenyeva(1970-1971) 1,2,3: Wordlists, very few comments, direct meanings only 4: Not explanatory, differences not elucidated, no examples 5: Rather archaic, based on texts of XIX century, few modern words. Differences not enough explained

  17. New idea: first implementation Ju.D.Apresjan et al. English-Russian Dictionary of Synonyms. 1979 • Explication of the shared part of meaning of synonyms in a special metalanguage • Using universal semantic features • All similarities and differences at all levels of language described • Neutralization conditions • Examples from literature • Linguistic experiments (consideration of different words in same context and judgment on their grammaticality)

  18. New Explanatory Dictionary • New Explanatory Dictionary of Russian Synonyms. Project started by Jurij Apresjan and his colleagues at the Russian Language Institute in 1990 • Three issues: • 1997: 132 entries • 2000: 117 entries • 2003: 105 entries • 2004: complete and revised edition

  19. NED: new edition • Novyj ob”jasnitelnyj slovar’ sinonimov russkogo jazyka [New Explanatory Dictionary of Russian Synonyms], 2nd edition, Moscow–Wien, Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury – Wiener Slawistischer Almanach, 2004. 1488 p. • Available online under http://www.ruslang.ru/agens.php?id=text_noss2_title

  20. NED: a review • 354 entries (=synonym series) • 1500 words described in detail • 10000 words mentioned (all mentions referred to in the index) • Most synonym series are anthropocentric, or describe the man. The anthropocentric lexicon is very diverse and contains most lexicographical types • Each lexicon entry is a result of a scientific study by one of the 13 authors, thoroughly and comprehensively discussed by the whole team

  21. Principles of NED • Active • Systematic • Integral • Reflects the naïve picture of the world • Uses special metalanguage • Combines methods of corpus lexicography and experimental linguistics • Ideographic

  22. Series of synonyms • A series of synonyms is an elementary lexicographic type. The description of each series of synonyms is systematic in 2 aspects: • Compared with other series of synonyms and, when possible, incorporated into a larger fragment of the semantic system of the language • Elements of every series of synonyms compared with each other • In both cases, the comparison is based on the common arsenal of semantic features

  23. Structure of NED • Heading • Preamble • Meaning • Notes • Form • Syntax • Co-occurence • Examples • Auxiliary zones • Bibliography

  24. Heading • Words-members of the synonym series • The dominant: a foreground lexeme which has the most general meaning in the given series, has the broadest application and co-occurrence, is most neutral • Stylistic labels and grammatical notes • Explication of the common component of the meanings of all lexemes within the series (if it is not a semantic primitive)

  25. Preamble Place of the synonym series within the set of other words with close meanings. Described are: • Similarities and distinctions of the given synonym series and other words, groups of words and synonym series • The higher class of hierarchy which includes all the words described within the preamble • The fragment of the NPW to which the given series corresponds

  26. Meaning • Synopsis: short guide to the dictionary entry, listing the semantic and other features which provide basic oppositions within the synonym series • Similarities and distinctions in content between synonyms • Communicative properties of synonyms • Pragmatic and extranlinguistic conditions • Neutralization conditions • Notes • peripheral synonyms not included in the series • other close meanings of the words discussed • other words with meanings similar to the one considered

  27. pytat’sja, probovat’, starat’sja, silit’sja ‘to attempt’: differences • the scale and nature of the action the subject wishes to perform • the amount of effort and the objective need for it • the possibility or impossibility of isolating a single application of effort • the possibility of performing an action and the probability of achieving a result • the cause of possible failure • the subject’s readiness to try alternative ways of achieving the result if the first attempt should fail • the motivation for the action and the subject’s attitude to it • the presence of an external observer

  28. nadejat’sja, upovat’, rasschity-vat’, polagat’sja ‘to hope’ • does the subject’s inner state presuppose emotion? • what underlies the state of mind – an opinion, a belief, reasoning, or trust and previous experience? • what is the nature and scale of the force with which the subject’s hopes are linked? • what is the intensity of the expectation? • how sure is the subject that the desired event will come to pass and how far is it removed in time from the moment of observation? • what is the subject’s current situation? • what other mental states accompany the given state?

  29. Form • Distinctions in the set of grammatical forms • Distinctions in the set of grammatical meanings of a single form • Semantic, syntactic, stylistic, and other specialization of forms • Proper (prototypical) and non-proper (shifted) forms

  30. Syntax • Differences in government • Differences in syntactic types of sentence • Word order • Semantic, syntactic, stylistic, and other specializations of constructions

  31. Co-occurrence • Lexico-semantic co-occurrence • Morphological co-occurrence • Communicative co-occurrence • Semantic specialization of types of co-occurrence

  32. Examples • Form the research base and the basis for conclusions regarding the various properties of the synonyms • Serve an illustrative purpose, showing the real potential of a lexeme in modern language • Based on a large corpus

  33. Auxiliary zones • phraseological synonyms (combinations of two or more lexemes synonymical to the series) • analogues (words whose meanings intersect substantially with the general meaning of the series, but not enough to be considered synonyms) • conversives (words denoting the same situation but with different role structure, such as buy – sell) • conversives to analogues • exact and inexact antonyms • derivatives

  34. Bibliography • In some synonym series, includes references to theoretical works dealing with one or more of the synonyms considered in drafting the given series

  35. Next lecture • Polysemy and its sources. Regular polysemy. Structure of word meanings (lexemes). Metaphor and metonymy. The lexeme and its uses.

More Related