760 likes | 767 Views
Chapter 7. The Road to Revolution 1763–1775. I. The Deep Roots of Revolution. America was a revolutionary force from the day of its discovery by Europeans: The New World nurtured new ideas about the nature of society, citizens, and government.
E N D
Chapter 7 The Road to Revolution 1763–1775
I. The Deep Roots of Revolution • America was a revolutionary force from the day of its discovery by Europeans: • The New World nurtured new ideas about the nature of society, citizens, and government. • Republicanism—defined a just society as one in which all citizens willingly subordinated their private, selfish interests to the common good. • Stability and government depended on the virtue of the citizenry.
I. The Deep Roots of Revolution(cont.) • Virtue of the citizenry—its capacity for: • Selflessness • Self-sufficiency • Courage • Appetite for civic involvement • Republicanism was opposed to hierarchical and authoritarian institutions such as aristocracy and monarchy.
I. The Deep Roots of Revolution(cont.) • Radical Whigs: British political commentators whose ideas fundamentally shaped American political thought: • They feared the threat to liberty posed by the arbitrary power of the monarch and his ministers relative to elected representatives in Parliament. • They warned citizens to guard against “corruption” and conspiracies to take away their liberties.
I. The Deep Roots of Revolution(cont.) • Americans had grown accustomed to running their own affairs. • The great distance from Britain weakened royal authority.
II. Mercantilism and Colonial Grievances • Mercantilism: • Rested on the belief that wealth was power. • A country’s economic wealth (and its military and political power) could be measured by the amount of gold or silver in its treasury. • To amass gold or silver, a country needed to export more than it imported.
II. Mercantilism and Colonial Grievances (cont.) • Colonies conferred distinct advantages: • Could supply raw materials to mother country, reducing need for foreign imports. • Could provide guaranteed market for exports. • London government viewed American colonies as tenants.
II. Mercantilism and Colonial Grievances (cont.) • From time to time Parliament passed laws to regulate the mercantilist system: • Navigation Law (1650)—aimed at Dutch shippers—said that all commerce flowing to and from colonies could be transported only in British (including colonial) vessels. • European goods destined for America first had to land in Britain, where tariff duties could be collected and British middlemen got profits.
II. Mercantilism and Colonial Grievances (cont.) • Other laws stipulated that American merchants must ship “enumerated” products, notably tobacco, exclusively to Britain, even though prices might be better elsewhere. • British policy inflicted a currency shortage on the colonies. • This situation forced the colonies to issue paper money.
II. Mercantilism and Colonial Grievances (cont.) • But Parliament prohibited colonial legislatures from printing paper currency. • The British crown reserved the right to nullify any legislation passed by colonial assemblies if it would harm the mercantilist system. • Royal veto was rarely used, but just the idea of a veto incited colonial anger.
III. The Merits and Menace of Mercantilism • The British mercantile system seemed oppressive, but its laws were loosely enforced. • Americans also reaped direct benefits: • London paid liberal bounties to colonial producers. • Colonies had protection of the world’s most powerful navy and a strong, seasoned army.
III. The Merits and Menace of Mercantilism (cont.) • The mercantile system burdened colonists with annoying liabilities: • It stifled economic initiative and imposed a rankling dependency on British agents and creditors. • Colonists found it to be debasing: • They felt used and kept in a state of perpetual economic adolescence.
IV. The Stamp Tax Uproar • After the Seven Years’ War, Britain held one of world’s largest empires and the biggest debt. • It moved to redefine its relationship with the colonies. • 1763: Prime Minister George Grenville ordered the navy to strictly enforce the Navigation Laws.
IV. The Stamp Tax Uproar(cont.) • 1764: He secured from Parliament the Sugar Act, the first law passed by Parliament to raise revenue for the crown from colonies: • Increased duty on sugar from the West Indies. • After bitter protests, duties were lowered substantially, and agitation died down. • Resentment renewed when the Quartering Act (1765) required colonies to provide food and quarters for British troops.
IV. The Stamp Tax Uproar(cont.) • 1765: Stamp tax was imposed: • It aimed to raise revenue to support the new military force. • It mandated the use of stamped paper or affixing of stamps, certifying tax payment. • Stamps were required on bills of sale for about 50 trade items. • Grenville regarded these measures as reasonable. • People in England paid a higher stamp tax.
IV. The Stamp Tax Uproar(cont.) • But Americans were angry: • The new law pinched pocketbooks and seemed to strike at local liberties. • Some colonies refused to comply with the Quartering Act; some voted only to supply a fraction of the supplies requested. • The acts also seemed to jeopardize the basic rights of colonists as Englishmen. • Offenders were tried in admiralty courts without juries and “innocent until proven guilty” concept.
IV. The Stamp Tax Uproar(cont.) • With French and Indians defeated, what need was there for a military force in the colonies? • Colonists feared a conspiracy to strip them of their historic liberties. • The Stamp Act became the chief target of their anger.
IV. The Stamp Tax Uproar(cont.) • Americans made a distinction between “legislation” and “taxation”: • They conceded the right of Parliament to legislate matters related to the entire empire. • They denied the right of Parliament, in which no Americans were seated, to impose taxes on Americans. • Such taxes were seen as robbery. • Only colonial assemblies could tax colonists.
IV. The Stamp Tax Uproar(cont.) • Grenville used the theory of “virtual representation”: • All citizens were represented by Parliament. • The dispute eventually caused Americans to: • Deny the authority of Parliament • Consider their own political independence
V. Forced Repeal of the Stamp Act • Colonial protest against the hated stamp tax took various forms: • Stamp Act Congress of 1765: • Stated the rights and grievances of colonists • Beseeched the king and Parliament to repeal the repugnant legislation • Was ignored in England • Was a significant step toward intercolonial unity
V. Forced Repeal of the Stamp Act(cont.) • Nonimportation agreements: • Agreements against importing British goods • Were a promising stride toward union • Helped unite the American people for the first time in common action • Gave Americans new opportunities to participate in colonial protests
V. Forced Repeal of the Stamp Act(cont.) • Sons of Liberty and Daughters of Liberty: • Took law into their own hands • Cried, “Liberty, Property, and No Stamps” • Shaken by colonial commotion, the machinery for collecting the tax broke down. • By the time the act was to go into effect (1765), all stamp agents had been forced to resign. • The boycott also hurt the English economy. • Parliament repealed the Stamp Act in 1766.
V. Forced Repeal of the Stamp Act(cont.) • Parliament then passed the Declaratory Act reaffirming its right “to bind” colonies “in all cases whatsoever.” • The British government defined its constitutional principle: absolute and unqualified sovereignty over the colonies. • The stage was set for continuing confrontation as colonies wanted a measure of their own sovereignty.
VI. The Townshend Tea Tax and the Boston “Massacre” • 1767: Townshend Acts: • Imposed a light import duty on glass, white lead, paper, paint, and tea • Was an indirect customs duty payable at American ports • Colonists refused any taxes without representation. • They were especially concerned because these taxes would pay salaries of royal governors.
VI. The Townshend Tea Tax and the Boston “Massacre” (cont.) • Nonimportation agreements were renewed against Townshend Acts, but • Colonists took the light new tax less seriously. • They found they could get cheap tea via smuggling. • To enforce order, British then landed two regiments of troops in Boston in 1768. • March 5, 1770: A clash erupted that became known as the Boston Massacre.
VI. The Townshend Tea Tax and the Boston “Massacre” (cont.) • Crispus Attucks, a “mulatto” and a leader of the mob, was one of the first to die. • Both sides shared blame for the incident, but only two redcoats were found guilty. • The soldiers were then released after being branded on the hand.
VII. The Seditious Committees of Correspondence • By 1770, young King George III was attempting to assert the power of monarchy. • He surrounded himself with “yes men,” notably his prime minister, Lord North. • Townshend Acts: • They failed to generate revenue. • But they did produce near-rebellion. • Nonimportation actions hurt English economy.
VII. The Seditious Committees of Correspondence (cont.) • Parliament eventually repealed most Townshend duties but kept the tax on tea. • But flames of discontent continued because: • British officials increased efforts to enforce the Navigation Laws. • Zealous Samuel Adams continued to incite what was called his “trained mob.” • Adams organized first committees of correspondence in Massachusetts.
VII. The Seditious Committees of Correspondence (cont.) • Committees of correspondence: • After one was organized in Boston (1772), some 80 towns set up similar organizations. • They exchanged letters that kept alive opposition to British policy. • Intercolonial correspondence committees were the next logical step. • Virginia led the way in 1773. • Twelve other colonies soon joined the effort.
VII. The Seditious Committees of Correspondence (cont.) • They played a key role in stimulating and disseminating sentiment in favor of united action. • They evolved directly into the first American congresses.
VIII. Tea Brewing in Boston • By 1773, the powerful British East India Company was facing bankruptcy: • It had 17 million pounds of unsold tea. • British ministry awarded it a complete monopoly of the American tea business. • It could sell its tea at a very low price. • But colonists saw this as an attempt to trick them into accepting taxes.
VIII. Tea Brewing in Boston(cont.) • British authorities decided to enforce the law: • Colonists rose up in anger. • Mass demonstrations forced tea-bearing ships to return to England with their cargo. • Only in Boston did a British official refuse to be cowed. • Governor Thomas Hutchinson refused to budge.
VIII. Tea Brewing in Boston(cont.) • Hutchinson infuriated Boston’s radicals when he ordered tea ships not to leave Boston until they had unloaded their cargoes: • December 16, 1773: About 100 Bostonians, loosely disguised as Indians, boarded the ships. • They smashed open 342 chests of tea and dumped the contents into the harbor. • This action became known as the Boston Tea Party.
VIII. Tea Brewing in Boston(cont.) • Reaction varied: • Sympathetic colonists applauded. • Referring to tea as “a badge of slavery,” they burned the hated leaves in solidarity with Boston. • Hutchinson, chastened and disgusted, retreated to Britain, never to return. • The British chose a perilous path that led only to reprisals, bitterness, and escalating conflict.
IX. Parliament Passes the “Intolerable Acts” • Parliament responded with measures in 1774 that brewed a revolution: • It passed a series of acts to chastise colonists, especially in Boston. • The acts were branded in colonies as “the massacre of American Liberty.” • Most drastic was the Boston Port Act: • It closed the port until damages were paid.
IX. Parliament Passes the “Intolerable Acts” (cont.) • Other Intolerable Acts limited rights traditionally practiced in Massachusetts: • Restrictions were placed on town meetings. • Unlike before, officials who killed colonists in line of duty could now be sent to Britain for trial. • New Quartering Act gave local authorities power to lodge soldiers anywhere, even private homes.
IX. Parliament Passes the “Intolerable Acts” (cont.) • Quebec Act (1774) covered French subjects in Canada: • It guaranteed their Catholic religion. • They could maintain institutions (which did not include representative assembly or trial by jury). • Québec’s boundaries extended to the Ohio River. • From French viewpoint, the Quebec Act was a shrewd and conciliatory measure.
IX. Parliament Passes the “Intolerable Acts” (cont.) • From American viewpoint, the act was noxious: • It had a much wider range. • It set a dangerous precedent by denying jury trials and by allowing unrepresentative assemblies. • It alarmed land speculators by snatching a huge trans-Allegheny area from their grasp (Map 7.1). • It angered anti-Catholics by extending Catholic jurisdiction south into a region about the size of the 13 colonies.
X. Bloodshed • American dissenters responded to the plight of Massachusetts: • Colonies sent food to the stricken city of Boston. • Rice was shipped from faraway South Carolina. • Most memorable was summoning of the First Continental Congress in 1774: • It met in Philadelphia to redress grievances. • 12 of 13 colonies (except Georgia) sent 55 men: S. Adams, J. Adams, G. Washington, P. Henry.
X. Bloodshed (cont.) • First Continental Congress (cont.): • Deliberated for 7 weeks in fall 1774. • Not a legislative but a consultative body. • A convention rather than a congress. • John Adams played a key role. • It drew up a Declaration of Rights as well as a solemn appeal to other British colonies, to the king, and to the British people.