100 likes | 120 Views
Humanities RQF Trial Results & RQF Groups. September 2007. RQF Trial Results. RQF Trial Divisional Results. Humanities RQF Plan. Contemporary Music Studies Anthropology/Cultural Practice group. Group Leaders (Preparation of ‘Evidence Portfolio’ for RQF Submission).
E N D
Humanities RQF Trial Results & RQF Groups September 2007
Humanities RQF Plan Contemporary Music Studies Anthropology/Cultural Practice group
Group Leaders(Preparation of ‘Evidence Portfolio’ for RQF Submission) Ancient History Group: Assoc. Prof. Tom Hillard Dr. Trevor Evans Modern History and Politics Group: Prof. Angela Woollacott Prof. Murray Goot English and European Literatures Group: Prof. John Stephens Assoc. Prof. Martina Möllering
RQF Submission ‘Home Panels’ (13): Panel 9: Social Sciences and Politics Panel 12: Humanities Panel 13: Creative Arts, Design, and Built Environment Evidence Portfolio: 1. Group identification 2. Context Statement 3. Details of each researcher 4. Statement of Claims for Impact 5. Metrics (journal rankings)
Evidence Portfolio • Group identification: • Name of Group • RFCD codes (up to 3) and SEO codes • Home Panel and any cross-disciplinary Panel
Evidence Portfolio • 2. Context Statement: • Statement of history, strategic focus, and research objectives of the Group • Summary of main achievements of the Group • Extent of Cohesion and Collaboration within the Group • Collaborative research within the Institution (i.e. University) and/or elsewhere (Australia and overseas) • Support for ECRs and HDR students • Esteem factors • Comment on difficulties overcome • Funding income
Evidence Portfolio • 3. Details of each researcher: • Four ‘Best’ • ‘Body of Work’ (all publications) • (i.e. a revised version of information prepared for the RQF Trial, • using feedback from comments)
Evidence Portfolio • 4. Statement of Claims for Impact: • Engagement with end-users (including academic discipline) • Uptake of research (e.g. public policy) • Extent to which research has produced social, economic, environmental, cultural benefits • 5. Metrics • (journal rankings)