1 / 10

Exploring Humanities: Research Quality and Impact Assessment for RQF Submission

This preparation guide outlines the process for submitting an 'Evidence Portfolio' for the Research Quality Framework (RQF) in the field of Humanities. It includes guidelines for group identification, context statements, researcher details, impact claims, and metrics such as journal rankings. The guide emphasizes building a cohesive research group, collaborative projects, support for early-career researchers, and demonstrating research impact on society. By following these steps, researchers can effectively present their achievements and contributions to the humanities field.

cockerham
Download Presentation

Exploring Humanities: Research Quality and Impact Assessment for RQF Submission

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Humanities RQF Trial Results & RQF Groups September 2007

  2. RQF Trial Results

  3. RQF Trial Divisional Results

  4. Humanities RQF Plan Contemporary Music Studies  Anthropology/Cultural Practice group

  5. Group Leaders(Preparation of ‘Evidence Portfolio’ for RQF Submission) Ancient History Group: Assoc. Prof. Tom Hillard Dr. Trevor Evans Modern History and Politics Group: Prof. Angela Woollacott Prof. Murray Goot English and European Literatures Group: Prof. John Stephens Assoc. Prof. Martina Möllering

  6. RQF Submission ‘Home Panels’ (13): Panel 9: Social Sciences and Politics Panel 12: Humanities Panel 13: Creative Arts, Design, and Built Environment Evidence Portfolio: 1. Group identification 2. Context Statement 3. Details of each researcher 4. Statement of Claims for Impact 5. Metrics (journal rankings)

  7. Evidence Portfolio • Group identification: • Name of Group • RFCD codes (up to 3) and SEO codes • Home Panel and any cross-disciplinary Panel

  8. Evidence Portfolio • 2. Context Statement: • Statement of history, strategic focus, and research objectives of the Group • Summary of main achievements of the Group • Extent of Cohesion and Collaboration within the Group • Collaborative research within the Institution (i.e. University) and/or elsewhere (Australia and overseas) • Support for ECRs and HDR students • Esteem factors • Comment on difficulties overcome • Funding income

  9. Evidence Portfolio • 3. Details of each researcher: • Four ‘Best’ • ‘Body of Work’ (all publications) • (i.e. a revised version of information prepared for the RQF Trial, • using feedback from comments)

  10. Evidence Portfolio • 4. Statement of Claims for Impact: • Engagement with end-users (including academic discipline) • Uptake of research (e.g. public policy) • Extent to which research has produced social, economic, environmental, cultural benefits • 5. Metrics • (journal rankings)

More Related